Bellhorn04
-
Posts
54,666 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
75
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Bellhorn04
-
A cliff made of hash would be cool though.
-
Hard to say, but Timlin and Embree pitched superbly in the 2003 postseason, so Grady was just a bozo, I think.
-
Zero Eff's given = Don't give a f**k
-
Yeah, but Slasher is a DD hater too.
-
Yep. The Astros did a full-on tank job.
-
Yep. I'm up for anything right now.
-
I think you're right. I'm just saying that we at least have some experience in last place finishes. It's certainly hard to picture the Sox under John Henry going into a full rebuild mode. Maybe old Johnny Boy will sell the team before the Cliff gets here. Who the heck knows, really...
-
Nobody wants the cliff. (LOL) But we did somehow survive a few basement finishes recently.
-
Nothing makes a manager nuttier than the bullpen blowing games. It'll make teams do things like trade Varitek and Lowe for Slocumb.
-
Is it superstition to believe that the 9th inning really is different, that the 9th inning is the hardest one to pitch no matter what the stats say? I don't really know the answer. But there seem to be cases of pitchers who are great in the 7th and 8th but really struggle in the 9th. The old mysterious X factors.
-
If the guy that comes in in the 9th blows the game, you could argue that the closer was wasted because it's still a loss, and the closer threw a bunch of pitches, possibly making him unavailable for the next game. It's this worst case scenario that scares some managers, I think.
-
I think there may be something like an element of superstition to why many managers are reluctant to use their closer earlier than the 9th. They're afraid of what happens after the closer preserves the lead in the 8th. They're afraid that the reliever they bring in for the 9th will blow the game - which will not only result in a loss but will mean the real closer was wasted. When you look back on baseball history the most gut-wrenching losses and nightmarish memories generally come from games where your team blew it in the last hand and the other team 'walked it off', as the announcers like to say now. The 8th inning in 2003 being a notable exception, of course.
-
Well, that's part of the history but it's not really typical of it. Also, Koji was always a really good reliever. He didn't come out of nowhere. It was a great signing by Ben. With that signing he made up for the failures of Bailey, Hanrahan and Melancon.
-
No, they're not, I agree. That's part of what made Ben's job a tricky one, and part of why Dombrowski has little option but to try to win now.
-
You don't have to. But the other approach is very hit and miss. It certainly has been for the Red Sox. We have quite a history of guys failing as closers.
-
Possible, sure. But I'm not convinced the core was really that strong. As I've already noted, 3 of the highest WAR guys on the 2017 team were Sale, Kimbrel and Pomeranz. Strip them away and what do you have? Mookie Betts is the only real star of the rest.
-
Ha. Worked pretty good for the Cubs and the Astros!
-
He wasn't as good. That doesn't change the point about his value to the 2017 team.
-
lol
-
Gotta like a man with a sense of humor.
-
Well, if you pitch like a 10 WAR starter for 1/3 as many innings, it stands to reason you're worth 3.3 wins, doesn't it?
-
Everything is small next to the Big Apple!
-
You need both, plain and simple. It's also worth noting that Kimbrel had the 3rd highest fWAR on the team in 2017, higher than Pomeranz, higher than JBJ or Benintendi. That shows how much value can be provided in even 65-70 innings.
-
It's not an either or, of course. All the innings are important. Good starts won't get you anywhere if you have a bad bullpen.
-
Yes, they were not clutch.
