It might be argued that having 2 young catching prospects like Vazquez and Swihart was bound to become a problem at some point. I think we felt it was one of those 'good problems to have'. But I think it turned out to be a problem for Swihart, and perhaps for the team as well.
Somewhere John Farrell is smiling.
Oh well, I guess Sale threw a lot less in the spring, before the games that count started.
But it's pretty hard to minimize the number of pitches thrown by your stud horse when you're in what shapes up as a season-long division battle with the Yanks and you have a short window to try to win it all...isn't it?
Under the Mendoza line in mid-May, though. If anything, the numbers suggest a guy like Vazquez will go on a bit of a hot streak and end the season hitting .240 or so.
That's the way I'm sure team management is looking at it.
Fans tend to just look at the current BA and freak out about it.
I guess JH didn't think much of the last place finishes under Ben.
Say what you want but under DD we have 2 first place finishes and a great start this year.
I get all the cliff talk, but saying he hasn't done well in the short term is kind of stupid, Larry.
I don't disagree that he's been jerked around, but in 2016 they had Vazquez coming back from the injury, and they had Hanigan, who Ben had signed to a 2-year deal. If the plan was for Vazquez to be the #1, where did Swihart fit on the roster?
JBJ finished 5th in voting for MLB center fielders in the 2017 Fielding Bible awards, after a 4th place finish in 2016. That's some solid recognition from independent commentators right there.
This is the rare occasion I have to defend Stork. Unless he edited it out of his post, he didn't actually suggest trading ERod for a reliever, he just said he was a trade chip, after mocking the idea of trading JBJ for a reliever.