Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. One of the wins was also by 1 run.
  2. I have to respect their judgment in this case. I think they sized up Hanley's numbers and the issues with regard to the vesting option and decided the potential problems outweighed any potential benefits.
  3. It is a little baffling that we struggle so much against lefties when we have 2 of the best right-handed hitters in baseball.
  4. Sorry, jung, but I have to pile on here. Beni's not ready? You've kind of lost your marbles with that statement.
  5. Eh, as Red Sox fans we're whiners if we complain that much about the Pablo thing. We made a bad move and it burned us. We do enjoy a competitive imbalance with the size of our payroll.
  6. Kimmi, sometimes I rely pretty heavily on WAR. Hanley posted a negative WAR in 2017 and 2018 - which also happened to be his vesting option period. He was on pace to earn a $22 million payday for continued negative WAR. That is the brutal reality. And I liked the guy, too. But he had become an albatross. A little bit of power was all that was left. .700 OPS, very bad baserunner and a negative defensive player.
  7. Hanley is still the ultimate fooler, the ultimate tease. With our offense struggling some folks are now lamenting his departure, in spite of the following facts: -His FWAR this year was -.01. -3 of his 4 years with us he posted a negative fWAR. -The $22 million vesting option. Hanley is like Lady Luck at a casino. Even though you've been losing and losing you think if you give her one more try it's sure to pay off.
  8. Holy crap, jung. You really have a flair for the melodramatic.
  9. Now that's the spirit!
  10. That's one of the most ludicrous rumors I've ever read.
  11. Kelly was not used in any one-sided situations. The only one-sided situation that can be argued was Kimbrel with a 4-run lead and a clean inning. And as I have said and as can be easily proven, managers frequently use their closers with a 4-run lead.
  12. Also, the book on Holt's offense is that he fades as the season goes on or as he's being used regularly.
  13. Love to have him but he could be costly.
  14. The 4-5 year window included 2016 and 2017.
  15. Right you are. Next question - when was the last time an elite position player with an expiring contract was dealt at the deadline for a big haul? I'm looking for a comp for Machado obviously.
  16. Yeah, we should never sign anyone to anything longer than a 2 year deal. Mookie Betts? Forget him. Little guy, already has oblique issues.
  17. When was the last time an elite position player was dealt at the deadline? Seems like it's usually pitchers who are the big prizes at the deadline.
  18. I'm with you on this Kimmi.
  19. You could question the Kimbrel use in Game 2 vs. the Birds, but Kelly was only used in tight situations in that series. One was with a 4 run lead, but the bases were loaded when he came in.
  20. d-money doesn't quite get the concept that if you're less s***** than the other teams it actually means you're good.
  21. I think the Sox would have kept him a while longer at least if it wasn't for the vesting option, which proved to be a real albatross.
  22. And he's been benched.
  23. Man, this guy has been having a rough time. Hopefully he gets back to full health.
×
×
  • Create New...