White Sox starter is changed from TBD to Carlos Rodon, a lefty making his first start of the year after a rehab stint.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/rodonca01.shtml
Eh, the real killer on the Bagwell trade was that he was traded for a 2-month rental of a relief pitcher. A good one, but a setup guy, not even a closer. We got a grand total of 25 innings out of him.
So on the one hand you're complaining about Sale's innings.
On the other you're complaining because they used Beeks to give the rotation an extra day of rest.
Perfect!
As for the off days, there may be more of them but they're erratically placed of course. From May 8 to June 17 we're in a stretch where we play 39 times in 41 days.
I know you're a big Verlander fan.
In Verlander's first 8 postseason starts he had a 5.57 ERA.
Do those numbers lie? No, they're facts.
But they show that small samples are small samples and don't predict the future.
Yes, Johnson had a few bad outings that ballooned his ERA and made him look like a man on the way out. But he has rebounded nicely. Good to see, hope it continues.
Thanks Spud. I don't mean to be beating a dead horse about this. But I believe that because of the vesting option the Sox basically had to lie. Their only other option was to respond to every question with a Bill Belichick 'coach's decision' non-answer.
Interesting tidbit about Claussen. Any more examples of this?
I wouldn't have thought Beeks was being showcased because the Red Sox need every pitching prospect what with the cliff and all.
Yeah, I must say I don't envy GM's sometimes.
If you let a player like Mookie go and he kicks ass somewhere else for the next 5 years it makes you look bad. If you sign him to the big extension and he gets hurt or breaks down it makes you look bad.
??? They did if the real reason was the option.
I didn't see any of the coverage though. Was Dombrowski directly asked if the vesting option was a factor? Or did he volunteer this information?