Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Yeah the writer is no budgie.
  2. Hmm...that's a pretty good line.
  3. Well, Bloom has his work cut out there, you have to admit. We're going to be subtracting talent, clearly, from an 84-win team whose pitching rotation features health question marks in Sale and Eovaldi.
  4. I do agree that not fielding a competitive team will have an adverse affect. That's what makes it interesting to see exactly what they do.
  5. $100 million over a 3 year period, just to clarify.
  6. It would be very punitive this year though, because it would be the third year over the threshold. Plus they would lose revenue sharing money.
  7. Not by much though. FanGraphs had his total value for 2017-2019 at about 18 mill. Plus that huge 3-run jack in the WS.
  8. It's usually the way it works when teams win championships, though. A lot of stuff goes your way. It doesn't happen two years in a row. So we have no back to back WS winners any more.
  9. Don't be disgusted until something actually happens.
  10. The Padres have also signed Hosmer and Machado the last two years, clearly showing they are not averse to making an expensive splash here and there. And they need pitching. I've certainly seen more unlikely scenarios than the Padres being interested in Price...
  11. And the Yankees were lucky in 2009 because A-Rod had a great postseason for the only time in his career. The discredit game is pretty easy.
  12. It's not just the spending. It's the barren farm system. The Red Sox obviously need someone to rebuild the farm, and no one in their right mind would think DD is that guy.
  13. I'm quite sure it was a combination of things. The personality conflict stuff actually makes a nice cover, if the real reason was just a cold-blooded assessment that DD wasn't the right guy going forward.
  14. It's not an established fact by any stretch. And Henry also approved Cherington's signings, but that doesn't mean they had nothing to do with his departure.
  15. If the Red Sox FO is full of crap, where exactly are Gammons and Russo getting their facts on why Henry really fired DD?
  16. Actions speak louder than words. Hiring Chaim Bloom says money and strategy were very much on Henry's mind.
  17. That's not for the record. That's speculation. Henry made some remarks that suggested there were some differences on strategy.
  18. Is a +73 run differential not even considered 'competitive' by your standards? I think teams have made the playoffs and even won the World Series with worse.
  19. If I was the Dodgers I would have interest in Price if the Sox paid half. 3/48 for a pitcher of his pedigree seems like a decent risk to me.
  20. Weber's 29. I honestly don't know what the depth chart looks like, but I expect we better be prepared for once again having multiple relievers who are mediocre at best.
  21. Alex Speier has been debunking the rumor about discussions with the Dodgers re Betts.
  22. The sad thing is we had numerous guys who pitched WORSE than Weber did.
  23. And another day goes by. Boy: "Mr. Godot told me to tell you he won't come this evening, but surely to-morrow."
  24. So the Yankees can either trade him or put him on waivers?
×
×
  • Create New...