Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. To work on his game, maybe? He's pitched so little the last two seasons.
  2. The results are important, of course. It's just that every baseball GM walks into a different situation.
  3. Maybe this should be in the why was Mookie traded thread.
  4. Another question is whether we include Pedroia in the list of bloated contracts handed by Ben to DD. It wasn't at the time, but it certainly became one.
  5. There will always be debatable points. But I've already made my guess, which is that it wasn't the present payroll situation that compelled them to trade Mookie, it was the $400 million it would have taken to retain him.
  6. The hindsight jury measures these things on 'subsequent events'. You can already measure the loss on Price. 2020 0 2021 16 mill 2022 16 mill Total 32 mill Sale's & Eovaldi's are adjusted down for 2020. The rest we'll have to wait for.
  7. Rightly or wrongly, Logan Allen has become sort of the poster boy for DD's giving up too much in trades.
  8. The jury is out on DD's hand-me-downs, agreed. But we know one thing - those 4 you listed for Ben add up to zero WAR or less.
  9. Yep, I realize all that. I was merely addressing the "bloated contracts of aging stars" hyperbole, which came right on top of moon's claim of 2019 being a bad team. Obviously there are sound reasons for criticizing DD. But there's no need to distort things, either.
  10. It's true, he hasn't done much yet. Maybe he will, but it's no given.
  11. That's wild hyperbole about the contracts. Ben left worse contracts.
  12. There's no way you can call the 2019 team a bad team. It was the same team as the 2018 champs. It was one of the pre-season favorites. It had a Pythagorean record of 87-75.
  13. The bottom line is that Cash wears it. To me Cash is a guy who makes a lot of really good moves. But he also does some weird things. Not doing anything at this year's deadline was weird. Kind of like he gave up on this year.
  14. You know there's more to it than that. That's why you know we can contend again next year. DD didn't leave with many indisputably bad contracts on the books. I think Ben actually left with more bad contracts on the books than DD did.
  15. Not just GM's. Francona. A number of players. It's often been mentioned how the Red Sox have a tendency to smear people on the way out.
  16. Yeah, we'll never know. Now when they traded Lester to the A's, they could safely assume they would get another shot at him...
  17. Yeah, that idea was no good.
  18. Not Epstein, no, but many others.
  19. I don't think that's the point. The point is where did he leave the team for the next guy. It was bad, but far from destroyed.
  20. They fooled ya! I thought it was a possibility the minute we traded him. Friedman doesn't seem like the kind of guy to make a big splashy expensive trade for one season of a player. I suspected they would take a shot at keeping him.
  21. As far as DD being "overrated"...it seems to me he left Boston, like many before him, with his reputation in pretty bad shape. Not only a destroyer of farms but a terrible communicator...
  22. Well, now you're arguing with yourself, because you were just saying we should be competitive or contenders next year.
  23. And I don't think DD "destroyed the future". If all goes well, the only destroyed season will be 2020.
  24. And Pedroia's extension was a fraction (about 30%-110 vs. 365) of Mookie's.
  25. Maybe. I'm guessing he was very willing to entertain offers, but wasn't just looking to unload them.
×
×
  • Create New...