I don't disagree with you Hugh. But one can look at Buch's presence on the roster another way.
First I will state yet again my disdain for spending huge money on athletes. And I am one of Buch's biggest detractors.
I sort of see Buch as the Drew Bledsoe of the Sox. He is sort of a Cadillac in the garage, of sorts.
He can make quality starts, and he can pitch out of the pen with multiple innings if needed. It's not unlikely that he can pitch 170-200 or so innings. To me, that is cost efficiency compared to what we get out of Kimbrel for roughly the same money. 60-75 innings?
Also, for some reason everyone is conveniently forgetting how awful things can get when this team does not have quality starter depth. It's not like this team has an embarrassment of riches with their starters.
Yes, we have seven at present. But that often changes overnight during the season. One guy goes down and then we have six. And so on.
I understand the desire to move him for economic purposes or to help replenish the minors with talent.
I say keep Buch because there is a strong likely hood that he will be productive in 2017. It has been offered that he could be replaced with a less costly option. Maybe. But I say why bother? We know what we have in Buch. He may look like an expensive luxury now, but when we need him he will be there.
Ugh, I can't believe that I just wrote all that about a guy I have not wanted on this team for two years.