Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    85,985
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    261

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. I think this is overstating their relationship.
  2. Give him the contract and let him opt out. They still need a TOTR starter. Snell has a QO attachment and I don't like his profile. Montgomery doesn't have the QO, but also doesn't have ace upside. Of those three, it's gotta be Yamamoto regardless of the opt outs.
  3. It's been Mr Toad's Wild Ride. There's no doubt.
  4. Yup, like 2015/2022 bad. '23 and '15 both had about even R/RA. In '22 they gave up way more runs than what they actually scored.
  5. Power rankings of the last DAMN place teams: 2020 2012 2014 2022 2023 2015 If I had to rank 1992, it'd probably be in between 2020 and 2012.
  6. They were bad, but not 2020 bad.
  7. I think the budget is high enough, I think the specific acquisitions were what hurt the team. Replace Kluber with Eovaldi and last year's team looks much better.
  8. I don't see a difference between 4th and 5th place. Both are pretty terrible. The winning % may be a bigger indicator IMO.
  9. If it takes a month or two for Yamamoto to adjust, the season is over for that rotation. They’d need to be carried by a CY performance to be respectable.
  10. Sale - injury risk is high Houck - 5th starter Pivetta - 5th starter Crawfor - 5th starter Whitlock - injury risk
  11. 300 with opt out?
  12. Even if it’s just Yamamoto, they need to add to the rotation IMO.
  13. If it was his first TJS, I’d be much less concerned.
  14. A world class DH. The vast majority of 2x TJS guys don’t come back the same. It’s too much money to for the gamble IMO.
  15. I think Turner was fine. Get multiple DH types was a bad choice for sure.
  16. B most likely. His contract is going to be an overpay for a guy coming off his 2nd TJS.
  17. One of which is developing pitching. Another is an owner that can’t stay the course.
  18. I think he got scared by the Vaz blowback and was too indecisive to pull off a last second deal in ‘22. In ‘23, he just turtled because he wanted to stay as far away from the cap as possible and then wait for a deadline deal that he was unable to pull off.
  19. Well Turner worked out at least.
  20. Thanks to going over in ‘22 for no reason.
  21. There's a high variance for all prospects. Sox just do better with hitters for some reason. Since 1980: Hurst Boyd Clemens Lester Paplebon Buchholz Bello TBD vs Gedman Boggs Burks Greenwell Vaughn Valentin Nomar Nixon Pedroia Youk Ellsbury Mookie JBJ Xander Devers Beni Casas TBD
  22. We're competitive!
  23. 2. Weird about Roman since Mayer was awful in AA and Roman was good in a SSS. 4. No, Rafaela will never fix his plate discipline. He will always swing at everything he can reach. 6. If they trade Verdugo, Abreu will be featured heavily for the '23 Sox IMO. I think he's fine as the 4th OFer since he can play all 4 positions. 7. No. 8. My guess is that '23 looks similar to '22 and that his bat is not transcendent. At least his glove is adequate now. I'd trade him. 9. He has a better chance to start than #7. 10. We won't know until '25 most likely. He'll most likely tear up the FCL. He won't see advanced pitching until Salem.
  24. That's why I want to trade Mayer (SS) for a pitcher. Also, if they drafted more pitchers, are we sure they would have been developed properly? Their pipeline hasn't really been great in my lifetime.
  25. I never bought into it either. The smokescreen about him being a New Balance guy was DUMB.
×
×
  • Create New...