Jump to content
Check out our 2026 MLB Draft tracker, with player scouting reports, signing pool money, and much more! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    84,680

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    241

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. mvp 78
    FULL THROTTLE is why I wrote "we'll see." Breslow had a very good offseason last year. He needs to follow it up with another good one this year.
  2. mvp 78
  3. mvp 78
    They've made statements that they wouldn't, but we'll see.
  4. mvp 78
    It's only the 2nd day of the Winter Meetings. No reason to rant about roster makeup until ST rolls around.
  5. mvp 78
    They said that Garcia and Travieso should have been equal value for Oviedo and other sources were surprised that Breslow was able to bring back additional value. Guzman's glove gives him a high floor, but needs to work on the offensive side (has shown patience and pull power). Samaniego adjusted his mechanics post surgery and was able to be more effective in '25, but has not pitched above AA (secondaries need work). While Garcia was ranked 6th, they could make the case that he was in a tier that was anywhere from 6 to 15 or so (where some teams value him). Travieso was seen as a top 10 prospect by some other franchises, but also had a very fluid value similar to Garcia.
  6. mvp 78
    I'm surprised the Mets didn't want to keep him around. It's a high AAV, but is' not a crazy contract. Kinda weird at first glance.
  7. mvp 78
    Last season was PLAYOFFS 89-73. Feeling pretty good ATM.
  8. mvp 78
    Dead pull hitter, but really poor hard hit rate. Doesn't seem like a Bloom guy?
  9. mvp 78
    PITT is the least HR friendly stadium to RHB in MLB. Alonso should look elsewhere IMO.
  10. mvp 78
    What 4 World Series rings does to a person... 😼
  11. mvp 78
    They have stockpiled enough other SP assets that they could include in a trade for Paredes if they went that route. Would be surprised to see them trade Tolle/Early for anything but a superstar positional player or a TOTR guy.
  12. mvp 78
    If the market is Pitt, Cincy and Baltimore, it isn't much of a market.
  13. mvp 78
  14. mvp 78
    No way would the Sox do that. They were hesitant to include either for Ryan. Can't see them trading either for Paredes.
  15. mvp 78
    Not surprising with Schwarber.
  16. mvp 78
    Sox are interested in a lot of guys. Familiar pattern from almost every offseason from recent memory.
  17. mvp 78
    He shouldn't have to explain anything, but he really brought it on himself by opening up his mouth to begin with.
  18. mvp 78
    Early 1-2, 2.33 ERA (as a starter) Sandoval 18-49, 4.01 ERA (as a starter) Dobbins 4-1 4.25 ERA (as a starter) Oviedo 13-26, 4.39 ERA (as a starter) Crawford 16-29 4.69 ERA (as a starter) Tolle 0-1, 7.84 ERA (as a starter) To me, Early, Sandoval and Oviedo are competing for the last two spots going by what you posted. Considering the cash outlay and lack of options, Sandoval is definitely getting the first crack at the 5th spot in the rotation at the very least. Maybe he flames out? Maybe he's not ready and is phantom IL'd to start the year like we've seen with Bello, Giolito and others recently? I do wonder about the idea of moving Bello in a trade for a #2 rather than Tolle or Early.
  19. mvp 78
    I think you are confusing Breslow with Bloom.
  20. mvp 78
    The Mets 86'd that handshake agreement. 😢
  21. mvp 78
  22. mvp 78
    For a DH? No! For a #2? Maybe!
  23. mvp 78
    I'll side with the locals then!
  24. mvp 78
    When Breslow makes a perfectly fine trade but it doesn't include a #2:
  25. mvp 78
    If he's not done, what is there to get worked up about unless this specific trade is a problem. Ignore the idea of a #2, was this trade good or not?
×
×
  • Create New...