As someone who deals with cases like this for a living, I could not disagree with you more. Being open-and-close about a high-profile case like this one saying it's "damage control" is merely perpetuating a very real issue of people gaming the inter-gender violence system for their own benefit while damaging both real victims and innocent men accused of sexual violence. It also further alienates anyone with even a hint of an alternative lifestyle as "freaks". Quite honestly, the idea is beneath a gentleman and scholar such as yourself. As a baseball note, I'd be all for signing him on a prove-it deal.