And you are a beacon of positivism? Must you continue your boring lecturing of other posters for how they watch the games and what they discuss. Talk about negative.
When watching games, we note and discuss the truly outstanding plays as well as the errors and misplays. Everything else is standard fare -- very high level high skilled standard fare, but not enough to generate discussion. Are we supposed to ooh and ah about a throw to first base that gets the batter by 30 feet? If you examine the game threads, we mention, discuss and gush about the extraordinary physical and smart plays. Those discussions don't last that long, because there is little or no disagreement about the excellence of those plays and the positive impact on the game. On the other end of the spectrum, we mention the stupid plays, because first and foremost, they are preventable. Those plays also have a negative impact on the the outcome of games, but the impact of those plays can be subject to dispute. If you want to dispute the effect of those plays, that is why we are here, but cut out the ******** lecturing, and please try to keep the discussion to the plays in question and not discussing the effect of these types of plays on the entire season, which involves far more conjecture than discussing the effect of a particular play on the outcome a single game. I guess that you don't see that.