Yeah, and Jacoby Ellsbury's .360 average as a rookie in the 2007 postseason series is irrelevant. It's probably irrelevant today also that Verlander was in the top 10 in Cy Young voting, top 20 in MVP, and rookie of the year in 2006. He was one of the best pitchers in the league then, and ever since.But wait a minute, did you just factor out the regular season because it's convenient for you? I thought that mattered too.
Really, every time you discuss something with people on this site you try to fault their argument EVERY TIME with either "small sample size", "straw man", "irrelevant" or something of the sort... It'd be nice to see you not do that just once.
In the end, Verlander hasn't shown himself to be a great post season pitcher. Therefore, in the post season, his team may be at a disadvantage when he pitches regardless of how much talent he has or what he did in the regular season.