Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    Should Boston Pilfer A Division Rival to Replace Alex Bregman in Free Agency?

    Predicted to get similar contracts in free agency, would it make more sense for the Red Sox to target shortstop Bo Bichette instead of Alex Bregman?

    Jordan Leandre
    Image courtesy of © John E. Sokolowski-Imagn Images

    Red Sox Video

    With how the 2025 season unfolded, it's hard to picture any Boston Red Sox team for the remainder of the 2020s not having third baseman Alex Bregman on it.

    Even with the injury and subsequent struggles upon returning, the All-Star slashed .273/.360/.462 with a 125 wRC+ and 3.5 fWAR in 114 games. He also had a .462 on-base percentage in the team's three-game Wild Card series against the New York Yankees and hit an RBI double to seal Game 1.

    He made the decision to opt out of his current contract earlier this month, at least temporarily removing himself from the equation in Boston. Therefore, for the second offseason in a row, the team covets a middle-of-the-order righty bat... or two. Many assume (hope?) that the team will add a righty bopper in addition to Bregman. That pairing may have worked on the field, and the group loved him behind the scenes, but does it really make sense for the Red Sox to commit to him for six additional years on top of adding another high-priced player to the mix?

    The free agent market for impact right-handed bats is top-heavy, meaning the market cultivated by each player may need to act more desperate to land said player. Even when factoring in the trade market, there's just not a lot of noise surrounding impact righty hitters right now. That said, Jim Bowden of The Athletic ran a list of contract predictions. In his predictions, he has Bregman receiving a six-year deal worth $182 million -- a $30.3 million average annual value.

    That's the same contract he predicted New York Mets first baseman Pete Alonso gets in free agency. Both would be risks at their age, yes, but the upside is also unquestionable. Yet, the contract that caught my attention was that for Toronto Blue Jays infielder Bo Bichette.

    Bowden predicts Bichette will get seven years at $189 million total value ($27 mil AAV). Despite 2026 being his age-28 season, and coming off a 2025 in which he was better than Bregman at the plate, he has to get a full extra year to obtain just $7 million in total value. It's worth mentioning that these are simply predictions from Bowden (who is far from the most infallible source), so it's hardly a perfect indicator of the contract any of these players receive. For reference, ESPN's Jeff Passan predicted in September Bichette would sign a deal in the ballpark of what fellow shortstops Trea Turner and Xander Bogaerts got.

    Regardless, if the final contracts are close between Bregman and Bichette, and signing both is unfeasible, the Red Sox should target the services of Bichette.

    For starters, there's the aging curve of the two players. Bregman is already 32 years old and coming off of a season in which he dealt with a significant quad injury. Assuming it heals with rest, that shouldn't impact his play moving forward. but it serves as a reminder that he's getting older and with that comes injuries. On the other hand, Bichette will be 28 years old next season, meaning he's still got the prime of his career ahead of him. Not only that, but he's become a lock for 60 or so extra-base hits a year. Though his walk numbers aren't spectacular, he hits the ball hard and doesn't strike out. Yes, some BABIP luck is required since he's not a 30-plus-homer guy. But he only outperformed his expected batting average by four points in 2025 -- the dude mashes.

    That said, shortstop isn't the position Bichette sticks at long term, if one were to guess. Perhaps that's the reason Bowden is so low on his contract value. Calling him a butcher at the position feels harsh, but apropos to his defensive production. In 2025, he posted -13 DRS and -12 OAA, bringing his career totals to -19 and -32, respectively. Moving to second base seems like the obvious solution. In fact, Bichette is already playing there in the World Series for Toronto, albeit mostly due to physical limitations caused by a knee injury. While still not moving well, he's made some nice plays so far in this series at the position.

    There's one issue with signing Bichette to play second base, however. The Red Sox theoretically have two already on the roster, with the other playing short, between Trevor Story and Marcelo Mayer. As a result, they have three middle infielders and no third baseman to replace Bregman.

    The logical solution would be to situate Mayer at third base. However, the team must also navigate the possibility of Story's defensive regression being permanent and not some one-off. Thus, I've begun wondering about the upside of sticking Story at third base for the final two years of his contract.

    It seems extreme, seeing as there are clear limitations to Story's arm. Not only that, but he posted 10 OAA in 2022 at second base. That said, the veteran infielder posted zero OAA moving to his left and -2 ranging in—it was to his right that really tanked his defensive metrics.

    With third base not being the rangiest position on the field, it could do him some good not having to cover as much ground, which wouldn't be the case at the keystone whether he's playing alongside Triston Casas, Nathaniel Lowe or Pete Alonso in 2026. The Red Sox wouldn't be the first team to spam shortstops with a hypothetical Bichette signing. The San Diego Padres, as recent as 2024, had done the same. Their entire infield was comprised of shortstops: Bogaerts, Ha-Seong Kim, Manny Machado, and Jake Cronenworth.

    Deploying three shortstops and an offensive-minded first baseman could give the Red Sox a much more dynamic infield while not suffering at the plate, and Bichette's cleaner fit with the timeline of their current core could make him a de facto leader going forward, much like how George Springer has taken these current Blue Jays under his wing.

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    48 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    Where did I come close to saying I'm giving up on him?

    36 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    I agreed it's not ideal.

    There are other factors involved, like...

    1. His health and ability to play over 145 games (maybe even 100+) If we are going to sit him in 20 games, why not 20 out of the 40-45 times we'll face a lefty?

    2. Assume he sits 25 out of the 45 games we face a lefty. He'd still break his record for most games played in a season, but it would be "ruining" his development, according to you. He'd still face 20 LH'd starters and countless LH'd RP'ers and probably get more PAs vs LHPs than ever before, if he makes it a full season healthy.

    3. We have a guy named Romy, who kills lefties. I think Cora wants Masa as the FT DH, and if we bring Bregman back or sign another FT 3B and or 1Bman, then Romy has 0-1 slots to platoon at. I'm just suggesting he platoon some with Mayer. Romy should start 100% of games ve LHPs and even bat top 6. We need to put the best team on the field, and if slows Mayer's growth in batting vs LHPs by a smidgeon, so be it. he likely needs the rest, anyway.

    er?

    1. It's not like these guys sit around and do nothing on days they don't play.  They have training programs.  Not playing some games isn't the time off that I think people think it is.  Unless you're literally F**** from injury and can't move, you're being active and training your body ifyou're a pro athlete.  If hes not....shame on him. 

    2/3 there's a very stark difference between rotating ROmney around as a platoon guy and sitting Mayer, perhaps against some lefties and then strictly platooning him.  Definitions mean something to me, a utility guy who might take some at bats away from Mayer vs. LHP on days off iS NOT the same as him being a platoon player.  I'm not against that, I'm against a Platoon at SS. 

    1 minute ago, Hugh2 said:

    1. It's not like these guys sit around and do nothing on days they don't play.  They have training programs.  Not playing some games isn't the time off that I think people think it is.  Unless you're literally F**** from injury and can't move, you're being active and training your body ifyou're a pro athlete.  If hes not....shame on him. 

    2/3 there's a very stark difference between rotating ROmney around as a platoon guy and sitting Mayer, perhaps against some lefties and then strictly platooning him.  Definitions mean something to me, a utility guy who might take some at bats away from Mayer vs. LHP on days off iS NOT the same as him being a platoon player.  I'm not against that, I'm against a Platoon at SS. 

    I totally get everything you are saying, but playing Mayer 140 games, by far the most in his career is not going to stunt his development. He will still get more PAs vs LHPs than in any season of his life.

    Yes, and on days off, he can bat in the cage vs LHPs 75% of the time.

    On 11/5/2025 at 3:34 PM, Hugh2 said:

    I don't think that's a 100% fair accurate assessment of the Sox player development philosophy. 

    I think there's a very real difference between how you handle a guy long term vs. calling him up and exposing him to the big leagues for the first time. 

    There's a very stark difference between calling a kid up to the big leagues when he's still developing at the end of the year and platooning him for a month or two vs. platooning him all year round. The only way Mayer will ever learn to hit LHP will be hitting LHP. I feel pretty confident about stating that they're not going to go into the 2026 with plans for him to be both on the big league club and to be a platoon player.  

    I'm not saying they won't sit him vs. some lefties and let Romney get his at bats, but they're not going to cut his development short by depriving him of that opportunity.  He was ranked 15th/12th by BA/MLB last year (and got into the top 10 at various times).  Correct me if I'm wrong, but has a team ever taken a player of that caliber and potential and with only 125 at bats under their belt said "nahhhh lets platoon you now". 

     

    I don't know what to tell you, Cora has specifically said he believes in platooning rookies to start with. Mayer didn't have much of a season last year so you have to believe that he will be platooned this coming season. I don't think he will be long term, but if that was to be the plan - trade him now.

     

    Cora - 

    “I don’t know, maybe (the rookies will play) Friday, maybe Saturday, maybe Sunday,” Cora said, as seen on NESN. “Let’s wait until we see the lefty, and then when you seen the lineup you guys can ask me.

    “The lefties here are real lefties,” Cora said. “There’s stuff here. Especially the guys in the bullpen. I truly believe that if you’ve got stuff, you’re going to be here, you’re not going to be in Triple-A or Double-A. So what they see here is different.

    “I think the gap is big. It’s very big. When you play a team six times a week and you’re constantly moving guys up and down, the good ones are here. It gets to a point down there — I’m not saying it’s what they did, I think they’re very talented and they’ve earned the right to be in the big leagues — but there’s a big gap."

    “We can’t play 13 position players. We cannot,” “I get it, people get frustrated, but I get frustrated, too. I get the same question over and over again, but I’ve been doing it like this since 2018. Rafael Devers platooned in 2018, and right now he’s one of the best hitters in the big leagues.”

    On 11/5/2025 at 4:54 PM, mvp 78 said:

    The ceiling is still there. He just missed some development time and has things to work on. Not every prospect is going to crush it as quick as Roman did. 

    I think we can be honest about where his is today and what the expectations should be for this coming year. To me, let him have a full year in the bigs succeeding against RHB in largely a platoon role and try to get to October healthy. He may not get a full load of at bats against LHP, but if he was treated like Abreu, he's still see LHP like 15% of the time (most likely resting against really tough LHP). When Duran played everyday in '24, he faced LHP about 30% of the time. Is 50% of the at bats destroying his development? I don't really think so if it's his first year. 

    I agree. I'm not saying trade him, only that if the long term plan was platoon only, then send him now when his reputation is stellar. I don't believe that is the long term plan, though. 

    37 minutes ago, Hitch said:

    I agree. I'm not saying trade him, only that if the long term plan was platoon only, then send him now when his reputation is stellar. I don't believe that is the long term plan, though. 

    Right now, the rep is INJURY RISK.

    5 hours ago, mvp 78 said:

    You must hate baseball in the year 2025 then. 

    I'm not sure how this makes any sense.  Does one have to be in love with every single position, slot in the lineup, and player to not hate baseball?

    I think most people would prefer an everyday player over a platoon player.  It feels teams typically platoon when a better option isn't available.  It's reasonable in some cases, you can't have an all star at every position and sometimes a platoon can work out great, but you can't over use it because you ONLY GET 13 position players. 

    I don't think it's hateful, or unreasonable to state that someone would prefer continuity at a position such as short stop and not have it be a rotation of players. 

    1 hour ago, Hugh2 said:

    I'm not sure how this makes any sense.  Does one have to be in love with every single position, slot in the lineup, and player to not hate baseball?

    I think most people would prefer an everyday player over a platoon player.  It feels teams typically platoon when a better option isn't available.  It's reasonable in some cases, you can't have an all star at every position and sometimes a platoon can work out great, but you can't over use it because you ONLY GET 13 position players. 

    I don't think it's hateful, or unreasonable to state that someone would prefer continuity at a position such as short stop and not have it be a rotation of players. 

    The DHam’s, and Romy’s to some are like folk hero’s on here. I’ve stated more than once on here that I don’t like platoons at all. The biggest reason the Red Sox have had so many platoons  especially in the IF the past few years is, because of injuries at SS, and 1B, and the Red Sox haven’t been able to find a FT 2B. I would stick Mayer at SS, and let him play every day, and let’s see if he’s as good as some have been raving about since he was drafted, and see if he’s a real prospect, or more like a suspect. Of course he’s got to stay healthy too.

    5 minutes ago, Old Red said:

    The DHam’s, and Romy’s to some are like folk hero’s on here. I’ve stated more than once on here that I don’t like platoons at all. The biggest reason the Red Sox have had so many platoons  especially in the IF the past few years is, because of injuries at SS, and 1B, and the Red Sox haven’t been able to find a FT 2B. I would stick Mayer at SS, and let him play every day, and let’s see if he’s as good as some have been raving about since he was drafted, and see if he’s a real prospect, or more like a suspect. Of course he’s got to stay healthy too.

    Romy vs LHP

    978 OPS '25

    879 OPS '24

    He's no folk hero. He just hits LHP and the Sox have a lot of prominent LHBs (Abreu, Duran, Mayer, Anthony, Masa, Casas).

    6 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    Romy vs LHP

    978 OPS '25

    879 OPS '24

    He's no folk hero. He just hits LHP and the Sox have a lot of prominent LHBs (Abreu, Duran, Mayer, Anthony, Masa, Casas).

    I know all about his numbers, but he hasn’t played as much as he has is, because of those numbers, but because of injuries.

    On 11/5/2025 at 11:21 AM, Hugh2 said:

    *sigh*

    Everyone once in a while I feel so strongly about something I'd be willing to bet on it.  Anyone want to wager Mayer platooning in 2026?

    The Red Sox have a very strict plan for how they develop guys, yes they make exceptions like.....there's a few months left in the season and we are in a pennant race.  A perfect example of this is Tolle, who they moved to the bullpen for the end of the year/playoff run.  But he's probably going to move back to the rotation and start the year in AAA to finish his development. 

    Anyone who has listened to what guys like their director of player development talk about what they plan on doing with Mayer, or even Cora explicityly stating he's going to be a full time player it's BLATANTLY obvious they're going to play him full time. 

    THey're not looking at the splits on BA like you guys, assuming zero growth, and making the types of moves you make in September/October in the spring of next year.  I'll wager on that. 

    It completely depends on circumstances.  If we re-sign Bregman, then we'll have Romy/Mayer splitting some time, which means less lefties for Mayer.

    But if we sign Bichette or Kim, then Mayer starts at 3rd and plays every game.

    3 hours ago, Old Red said:

    I know all about his numbers, but he hasn’t played as much as he has is, because of those numbers, but because of injuries.

    No. His amount of play vs RHPs was because of injury. His amount vs LHPs was earned.

    He started playing more once Campbell was demoted. That was not an injury. Yes, he was able to DH due to Masa's injury and play 1B due to the Casas injury, but he'd have played 2B vs every LHPs once Campbell was demoted.

    1 hour ago, JoeBrady said:

    It completely depends on circumstances.  If we re-sign Bregman, then we'll have Romy/Mayer splitting some time, which means less lefties for Mayer.

    But if we sign Bichette or Kim, then Mayer starts at 3rd and plays every game.

    Romy could share a platoon with Masa at DH, Lowe or some other LHP at 1B or 2B/3B, especially if DHam (gasp) is involved in playing a lot.

    20 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    No. His amount of play vs RHPs was because of injury. His amount vs LHPs was earned.

    He started playing more once Campbell was demoted. That was not an injury. Yes, he was able to DH due to Masa's injury and play 1B due to the Casas injury, but he'd have played 2B vs every LHPs once Campbell was demoted.

    And like I said in the previous post before this one, and because the Red Sox haven’t been able to come up with a somewhat FT player at 2B, which is why they used 11 different 2B in 2024, which he was one of them. I’m not downplaying his contribution, but why it got there in the first place, and why it still gets more playtime.

    16 minutes ago, Old Red said:

    And like I said in the previous post before this one, and because the Red Sox haven’t been able to come up with a somewhat FT player at 2B, which is why they used 11 different 2B in 2024, which he was one of them. I’m not downplaying his contribution, but why it got there in the first place, and why it still gets more playtime.

    So, you agree it wasn't an injury that got Romy his PAs vs LHPs?

    I do agree he got almost all his PAs vs RH's SP'ers due to injuries.

    I've also been highlighting how our 2B position has been broken for about a decade.

    16 hours ago, Old Red said:

    The DHam’s, and Romy’s to some are like folk hero’s on here. I’ve stated more than once on here that I don’t like platoons at all. The biggest reason the Red Sox have had so many platoons  especially in the IF the past few years is, because of injuries at SS, and 1B, and the Red Sox haven’t been able to find a FT 2B. I would stick Mayer at SS, and let him play every day, and let’s see if he’s as good as some have been raving about since he was drafted, and see if he’s a real prospect, or more like a suspect. Of course he’s got to stay healthy too.

    It's not about folk hero's or what we'd do. It's what our manager does and has done for his whole time as a manager. He loves platoons. It's not down to injuries, it's quite literally his philosophy. 

    5 hours ago, Randy Red Sox said:

    i'd be shocked if JH approved any of Alonso, Bregman, or Bichette.  think someone coming off any injury or a down year on a 1 yr deal with an option on a 2nd year

    I'm actually more confident after not giving Gio the QO that we are now going to get out and grab two significant free agent signings for the infield and trade for a lower cost No2 (Ryan) and sadly not go after Skubal.

    6 hours ago, Randy Red Sox said:

    i'd be shocked if JH approved any of Alonso, Bregman, or Bichette.  think someone coming off any injury or a down year on a 1 yr deal with an option on a 2nd year

    That's why I keep talking about Hoskins, not because he's the best player available but because he fits the org's targeted profile. 

    16 minutes ago, Hitch said:

    I'm actually more confident after not giving Gio the QO that we are now going to get out and grab two significant free agent signings for the infield and trade for a lower cost No2 (Ryan) and sadly not go after Skubal.

    It makes me more confident that they won't get a guy attached to a QO, but will re-sign Breggie and trade for a starter. 

    40 minutes ago, Hitch said:

    It's not about folk hero's or what we'd do. It's what our manager does and has done for his whole time as a manager. He loves platoons. It's not down to injuries, it's quite literally his philosophy. 

    Did he love Franchy at 1B, or Arroyo in RF in Fenway, or did he just not have any other option? Casas at 1B, or a Toro/Romy combo. Injuries, or not another option? Having 11 different 2B in 2024 was quite a platoon. How’d that work out?

    5 minutes ago, Old Red said:

    Did he love Franchy at 1B, or Arroyo in RF in Fenway, or did he just not have any other option? Casas at 1B, or a Toro/Romy combo. Injuries, or not another option? Having 11 different 2B in 2024 was quite a platoon. How’d that work out?

    He was very excited to start Kiké at SS in '23! 

    There's a difference between platooning guys and churning through a bad roster. He likes platooning guys and showcasing a player's strength. I don't think he seeks out churning through DFA'able players like he had to in '23-'24. 

    50 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    It makes me more confident that they won't get a guy attached to a QO, but will re-sign Breggie and trade for a starter. 

    This is what I'm thinking now, and if they don't. But if they can't resign Bregman I wonder if they go after Pete Alonso.  That would certainly make for an intersting infield. 

    3B Story

    SS Mayer

    2nd a platoon of Hamilton/Romy

    1B Casas or Alonso

     

    Infield looks a lot better with Bregman in it. 

    7 hours ago, Randy Red Sox said:

    i'd be shocked if JH approved any of Alonso, Bregman, or Bichette.  think someone coming off any injury or a down year on a 1 yr deal with an option on a 2nd year

    Yes, most likely the next Bregman 2025 type deal: one year with options or opt outs and maybe a high AAV.

    30 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    He was very excited to start Kiké at SS in '23! 

    There's a difference between platooning guys and churning through a bad roster. He likes platooning guys and showcasing a player's strength. I don't think he seeks out churning through DFA'able players like he had to in '23-'24. 

    How could I forget about Kike at SS? Story, and Casas missed so much times the past few years, and that’s why the Red Sox went through so many different players at those positions, and not, because Cora likes to platoon. 2B is a different kind of situation where no one has been able to play halfway decent to stay there, and not, because Cora likes to platoon. That’s my point.

    3 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    This is what I'm thinking now, and if they don't. But if they can't resign Bregman I wonder if they go after Pete Alonso.  That would certainly make for an intersting infield. 

    3B Story

    SS Mayer

    2nd a platoon of Hamilton/Romy

    1B Casas or Alonso

     

    Infield looks a lot better with Bregman in it. 

    I can’t see Story going to 3B. 2B definitely if Cora will make the move.

    Just now, Old Red said:

    How could I forget about Kike at SS? Story, and Casas missed so much times the past few years, and that’s why the Red Sox went through so many different players at those positions, and not, because Cora likes to platoon. 2B is a different kind of situation where no one has been able to play halfway decent to stay there, and not, because Cora likes to platoon. That’s my point.

    Cora loved the Refsnyder platoon, so that kinda shows he's not against the idea.

    He may not love platoons, but I do not think he dislikes them. Yes, many of the platoons are formed after a player is hurt, and he is trying to maximize the best he can get out of bench players who usually have serious flaws- like putrid splits, but he could have chose just one sub, if he hated platoons. One of Cora's traits is that he tried to find playing time for all the players on the 26, and if you wanna play a flawed sub, you are going to pick games where he is most likely to succeed, such as vs a beneficial armed pitcher.

    In 2018, we traded for Pearce, who was used mostly as a platoon, until he played so well, Cora could not sit him. I think they started 2019 with HRam platooning at 1B. (I could be wrong.) In 2020, I think Dalbec and Pillar were semi-platooned. Ref started platooning in 2022. Romy started platooning in 2024, but he was forced to play vs RHPs, this year, and actually did okay.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...