Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    A Plea For The Red Sox To Sign Juan Soto


    Maddie Landis

    It's great to look for surplus value, to be strategic, and to sign players who suit your roster needs. But you know what else is great? Getting the best player on the market.

    Image courtesy of © Gregory Fisher-Imagn Images

    Red Sox Video

     “It’s expensive to sign baseball players,” John Henry once said, much to the chagrin of Red Sox fans. Henry’s statement rings true. Free agent contract values are increasing each year. Last offseason, Shohei Ohtani signed a 10-year, $700-million contract to play for the Los Angeles Dodgers, which broke the previous record for the most expensive professional sports contract. Previously, Mike Trout’s 12-year, $426.5-million extension was the largest contract in baseball. 

    AD_4nXdhj_oI-y-RRk8Wp-geqBwm7di40HM09uWA48A3S2RT0zxjw8Nh9nRvDh5xiMK9Kcoj2CzhWczVBMhQAvcd2fzB7-QRfOZRdC24r0p2_lCYzukr3hsuhXSKkptCB4F4QXuW7oosyDAxqnN9FbwcxrGqDpuL?key=iWyCQ8moxyvefOTTuGVrdMPw

    Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the free agent market dipped following the 2020 season. Free agents affected by the shortened pandemic season “only” inked $1.36 billion total in contracts. However, since then, the total value of free-agent contracts has risen steadily. Some players, arguably, aren’t worth their gargantuan contracts. Others are. 

    Twenty-six-year-old future Hall of Famers like Juan Soto seldom enters free agency. The Athletic projects that Soto will garner a 12-year, $540-million contract. He’s worth every penny, and the Red Sox must pursue him. 

    Sure, money is paramount to Soto, but winning comes in at a close second. It’s important to point out that the Red Sox are behemoths in recent World Series history. Since 2004, they have a 16-3 record in the World Series. On the other hand, the Yankees possess a 5-6 record. Sniping the Yankees' primary offseason target is a dub by itself.

    The Yankees' core is not sustainable. The World Series accentuated their roster construction flaws, from their shoddy defense to their inefficiency on the basepaths. Moreover, the Yankees have the second-oldest roster in the league at an average age of 29.3. Their roster is constrained by several aging superstars in the middle of expensive, long-term contracts. Gerrit Cole (34), Carlos Rodón (31), and Giancarlo Stanton (34) are being paid at least $25 million per year until 2027 or 2028. Aaron Judge has about $280 million remaining on his contract.

    As I mentioned earlier, Juan Soto is 26 years old. He’s two years younger than Rafael Devers, Jarren Duran, Tanner Houck, Kutter Crawford, and Garrett Whitlock. Soto has shown that his floor is an All-Star caliber player in six MLB seasons. His ceiling is a perennial top-10 MVP candidate and Silver Slugger winner.

    Soto would be “just another guy” in the crowded dugouts of the Yankees or Dodgers clubhouse, but he could be the star of the Red Sox. The Red Sox have a young homegrown core. Any egregious long-term contracts don’t saddle the organization. They have a strong farm system. Sustainable contention looms over the horizon, but they need someone to push them over from mediocrity. 

    Over the past couple of seasons, it seems like the Red Sox are banking on the Big Four to impact the major-league roster immediately. Putting all their eggs in one basket is a risky move. At the very least, one of the Big Four will break out in the majors. Allocating some, not all, of their resources toward a generational talent provides them with a backup plan and insurance in case any of their prospects fail to perform in the majors. 

    Opponents argue, “But Soto is a left-handed hitter! The team has too many lefties!” The roster is notably lefty-heavy, but it’s not like the Red Sox lefties can’t hit against left-handed pitching. Triston Casas and Rafael Devers hold 114 and 98 wRC+ career splits against southpaws.

    Soto is frequently likened to Ted Williams for a reason. He has no trouble hitting the ball, regardless of a pitcher’s handedness. Look at his career splits against left-handed pitching. 

    Career

    BA

    OBP

    SLG

    RBI

    HR

    K%

    wRC+

    vs LHP

    .268

    .383

    .475

    191

    56

    18.0

    135

    Wouldn't you like to see the second coming of Ted Williams spend the rest of his career in Fenway Park? Slotting Soto into the lineup would exacerbate the lefty-dominant nature of the lineup, but his career splits mark a substantial improvement over Ceddanne Rafaela (62 wRC+), Masataka Yoshida (84 wRC+), and Jarren Duran (88 wRC+).

    It's also important to remember that injuries were part of the reason the lineup was so lefty-heavy. The holes Vaughn Grissom and Trevor Story left in the infield were filled by left-handed batters David Hamilton, Dom Smith, and Enmanuel Valdez , creating a false narrative that the lineup is too reliant on left-handed batters. It should look a little more balanced next year with (fingers crossed) healthy seasons from Trevor Story and Vaughn Grissom. 

    Assuming Wilyer Abreu is traded, imagine this lineup:

    1. CF Jarren Duran (L)
    2. LF Juan Soto (L)
    3. 3B Rafael Devers (L)
    4. 1B Triston Casas (L)
    5. SS Trevor Story (R)
    6. DH Masataka Yoshida (L)
    7. C Connor Wong (R)
    8. RF Ceddanne Rafaela (R)
    9. 2B Vaughn Grissom (R)

    Beautiful, no? 

    Along with Triston Casas and Masataka Yoshida, Soto will exasperate opposing pitchers, driving pitch counts up and opposing managers insane.

    Soto could provide some cushion for Raffy and alleviate him from the burden/expectation of carrying the team’s offense. Despite being the team’s highest-paid player and the face of the franchise, Devers is notably reserved and shies away from the media. He’s not an outspoken leader, preferring to stay quiet and let his work speak for itself. This is fine, but the Boston media is intense and passionate. Soto is a showy performer and doesn’t shy away from the spotlight. By taking center stage in the organization, he would reduce pressure from the media. 

    Lefties with opposite field power can take advantage of the Green Monster and Soto is no exception. He pulled the ball more frequently while playing in Yankee Stadium last year, but he's capable of spraying the ball all over the field.

    AD_4nXerD0VtsBEf9HdeK6W6p22V9n6uCZw7lmBYVBCHKk4oZBVaSwS7y5_QJEE5kS4nz2FqDXJbb95JchkCeOKngme10BpJGaMrDaVj-bp1yq_GkYXeHPe3yIow00j7QNMMIjKcB9IZJ-2-VBSfoQvkQvFbYkbL?key=iWyCQ8moxyvefOTTuGVrdMPw

    Soto would pepper Lansdowne Street with home runs. He could easily hit 50+ home runs playing 81 games at Fenway each year. Heck, he might surpass David Ortiz’s single-season record of 54 home runs.

    Speaking of which, like David Ortiz, Soto is Dominican. He plays for the Dominican World Baseball team. The Red Sox have a strong history of Dominican baseball stars. Pedro Martinez, David Ortiz, and Manny Ramirez’s contributions to the 2004 Red Sox will never be forgotten. This past spring, the organization recently updated its Dominican Academy and played an exhibition series in Santo Domingo (Soto’s hometown). Juan Soto grew up idolizing Manny, Pedro, and Big Papi. Why not join Rafael Devers and Brayan Bello to form a new Dominican trio?

    Smart investments matter for sustainable contention. You can’t put a brand-new 2025 Ferrari 812 GTS engine in a 1995 PT Cruiser and expect the car to run smoothly. You also can’t keep “fixing” glaring holes with Band-Aids and expect a winning product on the field. The Red Sox indicated they’ll stop cosplaying as a small market team and are ready to spend. Simply spending for the sake of spending isn’t sustainable. They must be cognizant of where they're allocating their resources. 

    That said, the Red Sox have a list of things that need fixing in the offseason. Their outfield was a bright spot on the team and doesn’t necessarily need any additional help.  However, landing a generational talent like Soto should take precedence over their other issues, and the Red Sox must be proactive. Pursue Soto and let the rest of the roster sort itself out.

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    9 minutes ago, Deja Doh said:

    If we are really considering paying Soto $400 to $700 million, we could get three very players that would help this team and have less risk  long term.  

    Which 3 free agents do you have in mind that’s realistic and as consistent as Soto? He’s one of only guys to ever hit free agency who’s this good and this young. It’s also a bonus if it takes him away from the Yankees. 

    26 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    MLBTR is saying the Soto deal may reach $700M (beating Ohtani's $461M) and go to 14 years (one more than Harper's record 13 year deal.) Nit sure about referrals or opt-outs.

    $50M x 14 seems beyond an "overpay," and if we could get Burnes at $245M/7, Fried at $210M/7 and Scott at $80M/5, we'd be saving $70M. However, the AAV would be $76M v $50M.

    i'd love to have Soto, but his makes far more sense. this team needs pitching more than it needs hitting. or Soto and Fried at $80M AAV.

    35 minutes ago, Duran Is The Man said:

    i'd love to have Soto, but his makes far more sense. this team needs pitching more than it needs hitting. or Soto and Fried at $80M AAV.

    Unless we sign Scott or trade for a top closer, I don't see that much top pen help on the FA market. It's a lot cheaper to sign Scott than a second top SP, so it makes sense to sign Fried and Scott over Burnes and Fried, in terms of budget cost. 

    In theory, we could stay under the second tax line with this:

    $30M x 7 Burnes

    $27M x 7 Fried

    $17M x 5 Scott

    $6M x 1 Carson Kelly

    (This would also push Crawford to the pen for another improvement there.)

    I just can't see us getting both pitching prizes, but with the money apparently available for Soto, it makes me wonder.

    Probably, pie-in-the sky might be Fried, Adames, Hoffman, C Kelly.

    2 hours ago, moonslav59 said:

    Unless we sign Scott or trade for a top closer, I don't see that much top pen help on the FA market. It's a lot cheaper to sign Scott than a second top SP, so it makes sense to sign Fried and Scott over Burnes and Fried, in terms of budget cost. 

    In theory, we could stay under the second tax line with this:

    $30M x 7 Burnes

    $27M x 7 Fried

    $17M x 5 Scott

    $6M x 1 Carson Kelly

    (This would also push Crawford to the pen for another improvement there.)

    I just can't see us getting both pitching prizes, but with the money apparently available for Soto, it makes me wonder.

    Probably, pie-in-the sky might be Fried, Adames, Hoffman, C Kelly.

    Burnes AND Fried??  ha ha. think Pivetta and Chapman

    On 11/9/2024 at 11:22 AM, Bellhorn04 said:

    And what are we hearing about a trade for Crochet?  We're hearing you'd want to sign him to an extension ASAP.  The cheap part goes out the window pretty quick.

    I’m generally with you, but he’s also years younger than those free agents.

    Sox have been saying for years their preference to handing out bigger contracts to younger guys.  And literally said such when they extended Devers

    32 minutes ago, vjcsmoke said:

    I don't know how he arrived at these numbers, but according to this tweet we are now the favorites for landing Soto. Dude has 60k+ followers, so he's not exactly a nobody on Twitter. Hopefully this is true.

    image.png.71ab8da5d68be021eb3a49448e7d3d69.png

    I think the percent signs are the wrong symbols. It supposed to mean most 63-year olds that post on Red Sox forums favor Boston to sign Soto.

    The 9-year old for the Mets is the son of a NY coach. Toronto is just being babies about this.

    11 hours ago, Jasonbay44 said:

    Which 3 free agents do you have in mind that’s realistic and as consistent as Soto? He’s one of only guys to ever hit free agency who’s this good and this young. It’s also a bonus if it takes him away from the Yankees. 

    At some point, having Soto will make no sense if the Sox can’t surround him with talent.  

    Fourteen years and nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars is a lot for one player.  Rebuild the staff, and hope Anthony is the next MLB superstar…

     

    54 minutes ago, Bellhorn04 said:

    Reportedly the Jays latest offer works out to 1 billion Canadian dollars.

    I wish that was purely a joke.

    🙃

    In what will be a proper yet seemingly bizarre use of the word “only”,  an offer of $1 billion Canadian works out to “only” $710,000,000 USD

    1 minute ago, notin said:

    At some point, having Soto will make no sense if the Sox can’t surround him with talent.  

    Fourteen years and nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars is a lot for one player.  Rebuild the staff, and hope Anthony is the next MLB superstar…

     

    OTOH if the Sox are really going balls to the wall here, it suggests a pretty sudden and large shift in organizational philosophy.  Which is what Dan Secatore is hinting at in the article I linked in the Zack Scott thread.

    Maybe JH finally said "Well, this ain't workin', guys.  Time to change course from Tampa North to Dodgerland East!"

    Might be some wishful thinking on my part, too...

    8 hours ago, Randy Red Sox said:

    Burnes AND Fried??  ha ha. think Pivetta and Chapman

    I did say "I can't see us getting both," but I do think, if we lose out on Soto, the fans will settle for nothing less than one of the two. My guess is Fried and I'm thinking maybe they go with Adames or Bregman.

    The major issue I have with signing a 3Bman is this: I love the idea of moving Devers to share 1B/DH with Casas, and adding one of Bregman or Adames does the trick, but with Yoshida entrenched at DH, trading Casas would likely happen. To me, losing Casas negates the gains made by improving 3B defense. I really like Tristan's bat, too much.

    This is a big reason I have spent so much time exploring ways to dump some of Yoshida's contract, even if it means taking on a bigger contract in return, but for a position of need (P or 3B) so we can keep Casas.

    I don't see this as a solution:

    C: Wong & ____

    1B/DH: Devers/Casas

    2B: Campbell/Mayer (DHam/Grissom)

    SS: Story/Mayer

    3B: Bregman/Adames/Arenado

    LF: Yoshida/Refsnyder

    CF: Duran

    RF: Anthony/Campbell

    (Trade Abreu and or Rafaela for pitching)

    23 minutes ago, notin said:

    At some point, having Soto will make no sense if the Sox can’t surround him with talent.  

    Fourteen years and nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars is a lot for one player.  Rebuild the staff, and hope Anthony is the next MLB superstar…

     

    I mean I get that, but acquiring a guy like Soto without giving up prospects and maintaining an elite farm system with many young MLB players is a great start. It opens the door to a lot of trade possibilities and having Soto a core piece is about as good as you can hope for. 

    28 minutes ago, Bellhorn04 said:

    OTOH if the Sox are really going balls to the wall here, it suggests a pretty sudden and large shift in organizational philosophy.  Which is what Dan Secatore is hinting at in the article I linked in the Zack Scott thread.

    Maybe JH finally said "Well, this ain't workin', guys.  Time to change course from Tampa North to Dodgerland East!"

    Might be some wishful thinking on my part, too...

    I think more like the North Eastros.  Spend, but have a supplement pipeline…

    12 minutes ago, Jasonbay44 said:

    I mean I get that, but acquiring a guy like Soto without giving up prospects and maintaining an elite farm system with many young MLB players is a great start. It opens the door to a lot of trade possibilities and having Soto a core piece is about as good as you can hope for. 

    Yes, but how many of those young stars can you hold on to for more than 3 years?

     

    I want Soto, too, but the bidding has reached the point where I’m ok with someone else signing him.


    Even the Yankees.  They’ve shown already he doesn’t guarantee a World Series, and I have full faith that the one person who can keep a team with Soto aand Judge in check is Aaron Boone…

     

    2 hours ago, vjcsmoke said:

    I don't know how he arrived at these numbers, but according to this tweet we are now the favorites for landing Soto. Dude has 60k+ followers, so he's not exactly a nobody on Twitter. Hopefully this is true.

    image.png.71ab8da5d68be021eb3a49448e7d3d69.png

    Savage Sports is a nobody in a circle where even the biggest names (like Bar Stool Sports) have all but non-existent access to inside information.  Ignore them and their completely unsupported “data”…

    25 minutes ago, notin said:

    Yes, but how many of those young stars can you hold on to for more than 3 years?

     

    I want Soto, too, but the bidding has reached the point where I’m ok with someone else signing him.


    Even the Yankees.  They’ve shown already he doesn’t guarantee a World Series, and I have full faith that the one person who can keep a team with Soto aand Judge in check is Aaron Boone…

     

    Soto was the difference in the Bronx last year for a flawed team that made it to the World Series.

    The Yankees know they can go sign good free agent corner infielders and another outfielder and even more pitchers, but they won't be as good without Soto.

    As for pitching, that's one department New York never skimps on spending for -- and it's the main reason the Yanks are always contenders.

    38 minutes ago, notin said:

    Yes, but how many of those young stars can you hold on to for more than 3 years?

     

    I want Soto, too, but the bidding has reached the point where I’m ok with someone else signing him.


    Even the Yankees.  They’ve shown already he doesn’t guarantee a World Series, and I have full faith that the one person who can keep a team with Soto aand Judge in check is Aaron Boone…

     

    I think with the financially and prospect flexibility the team has now, combined with Juan Sotos skill set and age, this is a rare time where giving a long term contract has a very good chance of being worth to.

     

    I know Soto doesn’t “guarantee” a World Series but having him on your side and not on the Yankees definitely gives you a better chance, especially with how good he’s been in the playoffs in his limited time. He’s already played in two World Series and won 1 as a main contributor. 

    1 hour ago, Jasonbay44 said:

    I mean I get that, but acquiring a guy like Soto without giving up prospects and maintaining an elite farm system with many young MLB players is a great start. It opens the door to a lot of trade possibilities and having Soto a core piece is about as good as you can hope for. 

    Exactly, and although I am as high on Anthony as anybody in the world, and I'm not "for" trading him, he could be the best trading chip in MLB, right now for a top SP'er, including guys like Skubal, Skenes, Kirby and Gilbert. (not by himself, but any team would listen, if you opened your offer with Anthony as the headline- maybe Duran, as well.)

    Both of these, Duranless or Anthonyless OFs still look awesome:

    LF Soto

    CF Duran

    RF Abreu/Rafaela platoon (Campbell?)

    or

    LF Soto

    CF Anthony

    RF Abreu/Rafaela platoon (Campbell?)

    Trading for a younger pitcher is safer than signing Burnes or Fried to a 6 or 7 years deal.

     

    42 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    ...As for pitching, that's one department New York never skimps on spending for -- and it's the main reason the Yanks are always contenders.

    Excellent point, and this goes to the core position I have held for over 5 decades about the Sox and what made us winners vs losers.

    For 3 decades, we seemed to always be 1-2 quality pitchers away from winning a ring. 1972, 1975, 1978 and 1986 were key examples, IMO.

    It wasn't until JH and Theo came along, that this philosophy came into being. Dan D brought us Pedro, but it wasn't until we added Schilling that the first ring came to us. Later, when Pedro was gone, we added Beckett to ensure a ring. Although Lackey was not an ace, I don't think we win in 2013 without him. Sale & Price in 2018 were the difference makers. It's hard as hell for the Sox to win with just one top pitcher. Other teams did it. We did have several years where we had 2 quality SP'ers and did not win a ring, but IMO, we never won a ring with just one.

    1972: Siebert 3.80 & Marty Pattin 3.24 (Curtis 3.73 & McGlothen 3.41) was awesome, but that was the year the strike allowed us to miss the pennant by 1/2 game due to the unbalanced schedule the league allowed.

    1975: Tiant 4.02, Bill Le 3.95 and Wise 3.95 was a nice 3. We went 7 games.

    1986: Clemens was a god at 2.48. Hurst 2.99 and Boyd 3.78 were damn good, too. We went 7 games.

    2003: Pedro at 2.22 was godlike, too, but no other SP'er was under 4.09 (Wake)

    Several seasons between 2005 and 2019 had teams with 2 or more quality SP'ers and we got no ring. It is no guarantee, just as '72, '75, '86 were close calls, but all of our 4 ring seasons, we saw 2 high quality SP'er and either a really good closer or a 3rd quality SP'er, too.

    The Yanks have known this for many decades.

    10 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    Excellent point, and this goes to the core position I have held for over 5 decades about the Sox and what made us winners vs losers.

    For 3 decades, we seemed to always be 1-2 quality pitchers away from winning a ring. 1972, 1975, 1978 and 1986 were key examples, IMO.

    It wasn't until JH and Theo came along, that this philosophy came into being. Dan D brought us Pedro, but it wasn't until we added Schilling that the first ring came to us. Later, when Pedro was gone, we added Beckett to ensure a ring. Although Lackey was not an ace, I don't think we win in 2013 without him. Sale & Price in 2018 were the difference makers. It's hard as hell for the Sox to win with just one top pitcher. Other teams did it. We did have several years where we had 2 quality SP'ers and did not win a ring, but IMO, we never won a ring with just one.

    1972: Siebert 3.80 & Marty Pattin 3.24 (Curtis 3.73 & McGlothen 3.41) was awesome, but that was the year the strike allowed us to miss the pennant by 1/2 game due to the unbalanced schedule the league allowed.

    1975: Tiant 4.02, Bill Le 3.95 and Wise 3.95 was a nice 3. We went 7 games.

    1986: Clemens was a god at 2.48. Hurst 2.99 and Boyd 3.78 were damn good, too. We went 7 games.

    2003: Pedro at 2.22 was godlike, too, but no other SP'er was under 4.09 (Wake)

    Several seasons between 2005 and 2019 had teams with 2 or more quality SP'ers and we got no ring. It is no guarantee, just as '72, '75, '86 were close calls, but all of our 4 ring seasons, we saw 2 high quality SP'er and either a really good closer or a 3rd quality SP'er, too.

    The Yanks have known this for many decades.

    Good points, and memories. Don't forget in '72 who became the true ace: Looie, who led the AL in ERA.

    But when it came to pitching, Steinbrenner was just lethal. In '74 NY's team ERA was third, so he signed Cy Young Catfish Hunter. Their team ERA was third again in '75, so he added four more starters to the rotation.

    In '76 the Yanks had the top ERA and won the pennant, but lost the World Series to Cincy. So George signed Reds' ace, Don Gullet.

    In '77 New York won it all, but got beat in a game by LA's Tommy John. So George signed him, too. 

    The Yankees' ace reliever Sparky Lyle won the Cy that year, but then another All-Star, Goose Gossage, became a free agent that winter. So George signed him, too... because he could.

    55 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    Exactly, and although I am as high on Anthony as anybody in the world, and I'm not "for" trading him, he could be the best trading chip in MLB, right now for a top SP'er, including guys like Skubal, Skenes, Kirby and Gilbert. (not by himself, but any team would listen, if you opened your offer with Anthony as the headline- maybe Duran, as well.)

    Both of these, Duranless or Anthonyless OFs still look awesome:

    LF Soto

    CF Duran

    RF Abreu/Rafaela platoon (Campbell?)

    or

    LF Soto

    CF Anthony

    RF Abreu/Rafaela platoon (Campbell?)

    Trading for a younger pitcher is safer than signing Burnes or Fried to a 6 or 7 years deal.

     

    That is my thought process as well. We have so much OF talent if we sign Soto that it gives us a lot of options in the trade market with Abreu, Rafaela, Anthony, or even Duran (I really want to keep him.)

     

    Eventually something has to give and some of the prospects have to be traded, there isn’t enough room for them all. Even if they all reach their ceilings I’m not sure we ever find a Juan Soto in our system. He’s very special 

    38 minutes ago, Jasonbay44 said:

    That is my thought process as well. We have so much OF talent if we sign Soto that it gives us a lot of options in the trade market with Abreu, Rafaela, Anthony, or even Duran (I really want to keep him.)

     

    Eventually something has to give and some of the prospects have to be traded, there isn’t enough room for them all. Even if they all reach their ceilings I’m not sure we ever find a Juan Soto in our system. He’s very special 

    One key will be to identify which player to trade, and we better get that right. Trading at peak value is key, as well.

    Our OF currently as Duran, Abreu, Rafaela, Anthony, Refsnyder, Yoshida, Campbell and eventually JH Garcia, Montgomery and maybe Cespedes.

    Or middle IF has Story, Mayer, Campbell, DHam, Grissom, Romy, Sogard and eventually Arias, Romero and maybe Meidroth or Cespedes.

    Our corner IF has Devers, Casas and Meidroth.

    Our catching has Wong and Teel (late '24/early '25)

    I may be in a distinct minority, but I'd be fine starting the year with a DHam-Grissom platoon at 2B. Keeping Mayer over Campbell, since he can play SS well makes sense, but I absolutely love Campbell (and Anthony.) Campbell may also play CF or RF.

    Keeping Teel seems like a no-brainer, since Wong sucks on D. If we have to trade one from Anthony, Campbell and Mayer, I'd go with Mayer and hope Story can stay healthy enough to bridge us to Arias or Romero. In the OF, I'd love to keep Duran and Anthony, and since I'm keeping Campbell, we should be set enough to trade Abreu and or Rafaela. If we sign Soto, that changes everything in the OF. We could go all times best: LF Soto, CF Duran, RF Anthony, or trade Duran or Anthony in a package for an ace, and go with an Abreu-Rafaela platoon in CF-RF.

    With no Soto, I'd feel comfortable trading Mayer, Abreu and some mid level prospects for the best pitcher we can get.

    Rumor has it Mets have put forth a 730m dollar offer to Soto.

    Considering the difference in tax rates, for the Sox to match they would have to offer 715m.

    Will Red Sox up their bid, or does the dream stop here? Or is this rumored Mets offer bogus with a lot of deferred money to make it sound better than it is?

    Article: Yankees' Juan Soto Has Massive $730 Million Offer From NL Contender, Report Says

    10 minutes ago, vjcsmoke said:

    Rumor has it Mets have put forth a 730m dollar offer to Soto.

    Considering the difference in tax rates, for the Sox to match they would have to offer 715m.

    Will Red Sox up their bid, or does the dream stop here? Or is this rumored Mets offer bogus with a lot of deferred money to make it sound better than it is?

    Article: Yankees' Juan Soto Has Massive $730 Million Offer From NL Contender, Report Says

    If the Sox offer $730/15, do the Mets add $50M?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...