Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I thought Francona was a heck of a manager for you guys.

 

He was, just as Torre was for you. doesn't mean he won't get nicknamed.

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted
ok now im confused. should we start a new thread for the contest? wont that clutter up the forum? there's a whiny complaint everytime a thread is started. so are we or are we not to go off on tangents within threads? are you the f*&^@# thread police?

 

jeter blows a-rod

 

No, he's stating that this pissing contest isn't going to accomplish anything except raise YOTN's blood pressure when he has to go through it. The original post topic is actually relevant since it happened last night. Talking about WS accomplishments from over a decade ago is pointless as it has been rehashed countless times.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Except that it wasn't the Worlds Series, it was the ALCS. A WS between two AL teams would be something though wouldn't it?

 

I keep making that mistake, and I'm going to keep making that mistake because that ALCS felt more like a World Series atmosphere than any World Series game I've ever watched.

Community Moderator
Posted
OP talks about Boggs coming in with a World Series ring on he won while playing for NYY and trying to provoke a reaction.

 

This was a Red Sox-Yankees pissing contest from minute 1. That pretty much was the thread topic, "oh hey look, Boston legend had a Yankee ring on." I don't mind playing that game, it can be fun, and I'm pretty sure there's nothing against it in the forum rules -- but let's not even pretend that that wasn't the intention all along.

 

He brought it up because Boggs was wearing the ring on the day the Red Sox were celebrating him. That's a relevant topic, not a pissing contest.

Posted
It must be nice to be a fan of the ONLY clean team during the PED era.
We didn't win anything in the PED era- pre-2004, so it doesn't matter if we were clean or not, but at least our guys weren't paraded in front of Congress to explain how they cheated and none got prosecuted for lying to Congress and had their teammates testifying against them. LOL!! What a circus!
Posted
He brought it up because Boggs was wearing the ring on the day the Red Sox were celebrating him. That's a relevant topic, not a pissing contest.

 

But he has certainly encouraged the flaming, if not outright participated of it in a trollish manner.

Community Moderator
Posted
We didn't win anything in the PED era- pre-2004, so it doesn't matter if we were clean or not, but at least our guys weren't paraded in front of Congress to explain how they cheated and none got prosecuted for lying to Congress and had their teammates testifying against them. LOL!! What a circus!

 

Wasn't Schilling a part of that?

Posted
what do you guys think of jeter making the greatest ss in the world play 3b because jeter is a baby dik that refused to do what is best for the team?
Community Moderator
Posted
But he has certainly encouraged the flaming, if not outright participated of it in a trollish manner.

 

Oh, I agree. Just stating the original topic isn't horrible.

Posted
We didn't win anything in the PED era- pre-2004, so it doesn't matter if we were clean or not, but at least our guys weren't paraded in front of Congress to explain how they cheated and none got prosecuted for lying to Congress and had their teammates testifying against them. LOL!! What a circus!

 

The PED era certainly extends past 04

Old-Timey Member
Posted
He brought it up because Boggs was wearing the ring on the day the Red Sox were celebrating him. That's a relevant topic, not a pissing contest.

 

Exactly what reaction would you expect someone making that point to receive?

 

I've noticed that TBSF isn't quite a troll, but definitely a bit of a provocateur. Not that there's a real problem with that but when you see the post in context the resulting response was so obvious that you almost have to point out that TBSF had to have seen it coming.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
what do you guys think of jeter making the greatest ss in the world play 3b because jeter is a baby dik that refused to do what is best for the team?

 

you are not helping.

Community Moderator
Posted
We didn't win anything in the PED era- pre-2004, so it doesn't matter if we were clean or not, but at least our guys weren't paraded in front of Congress to explain how they cheated and none got prosecuted for lying to Congress and had their teammates testifying against them. LOL!! What a circus!

 

http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2015420

 

Schill sat right next to Palmeiro. Ugh.

Posted
You're kind of an ******* aren't you? It's fine to go on tangents, but the way this is going, it will become a flame war and the thread will be locked, which is what I'm trying to prevent.
The thread should have been locked from the initial post when Babe lit the match. If a Yankee fan wants t do that here, I will always turn the blow torch on them.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
No, I responded in kind.

 

In kind to responses you knew, or should have known, your post would generate.

 

Let's be accurate

Posted
ok now im confused. should we start a new thread for the contest? wont that clutter up the forum? there's a whiny complaint everytime a thread is started. so are we or are we not to go off on tangents within threads? are you the f*&^@# thread police?

 

jeter blows a-rod

 

It's not a whiny complaint, you petulant little brat, it's a request, from me, politely, to keep the forum from being overrun with threads. Do you have any idea how many threads I have merged into existing ones in the last month? If I hadn't done that, the first four pages of this forum would be filled with threads, all with less than 10 posts. You'd have to go back five pages just to find a serious discussion about anything other than a fleeting issue.

 

I'm done being polite. If you guys want to ignore my requests to stop creating a thread every time you find a player's name funny or enjoyed watching tonight's game, I can't stop you. I won't ban you for something that stupid, but I'm going to keep getting rid of them until you get the point. But you can sure as hell cut it out with the damned whining about it. Every day I read a half dozen posts from you and SinceYaz that oh-so-snarkily make it clear what you think about it. Since being calm, reasonable, and continually patient just does not seem to get the message across, maybe I should start acting a little more like the jackbooted thug you apparently think I am.

 

Just remember: If I really was a totalitarian dickhead, I'd have gotten rid of all of you the first time you got all pissy at me for merging your threads about the Red Sox Offense into the Red Sox Offense thread.

Community Moderator
Posted
Exactly what reaction would you expect someone making that point to receive?

 

I've noticed that TBSF isn't quite a troll, but definitely a bit of a provocateur. Not that there's a real problem with that but when you see the post in context the resulting response was so obvious that you almost have to point out that TBSF had to have seen it coming.

 

Maybe people saying if Boggs should take his ring off or not rather than ranting about 2004?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...