Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Lowrie is a utility player for this franchise' date=' nothing more.[/quote']

 

Not if he can stay healthy. Although, if the rest of the infield is healthy, he has no full-time position. Third base may be open next year.

  • Replies 638
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Not if he can stay healthy. Although' date=' if the rest of the infield is healthy, he has no full-time position. Third base may be open next year.[/quote']

 

That's what I meant by my post. There isn't an opening on this team for him right now and I really don't see them going into next season with him as their starting 3B.

Posted

When you say "nothing more" the implication is that you've defined a guy's ceiling, not just his role. I think that's why you got the reaction you did. Sure, Lowrie isn't going to be our starting 3B but if we need a guy who can play for a couple weeks in a row at 2B or SS no one would have a problem with that guy being Lowrie. He might actually be a better defensive SS than Scutaro and he can handle himself at second as well.

 

If we're in any danger of Lowrie playing third base regularly for us, I think the Sox will take delivery of Michael Young instead on a salary dump. Lowrie just doesn't have the arm to play third. I consider him a pure 2B-SS

Posted

 

If we're in any danger of Lowrie playing third base regularly for us, I think the Sox will take delivery of Michael Young instead on a salary dump. Lowrie just doesn't have the arm to play third.

 

The rest of Young's contract is 3/48. Why not just grab Beltre at that rate?

Posted
That's what I meant by my post. There isn't an opening on this team for him right now and I really don't see them going into next season with him as their starting 3B.

 

I sort of figured that out as I was typing my response!:D

 

When you say "nothing more" the implication is that you've defined a guy's ceiling, not just his role. I think that's why you got the reaction you did. Sure, Lowrie isn't going to be our starting 3B but if we need a guy who can play for a couple weeks in a row at 2B or SS no one would have a problem with that guy being Lowrie. He might actually be a better defensive SS than Scutaro and he can handle himself at second as well.

 

If we're in any danger of Lowrie playing third base regularly for us, I think the Sox will take delivery of Michael Young instead on a salary dump. Lowrie just doesn't have the arm to play third.

 

I understand what WB was saying. I'm not as quick to dismiss his arm. I haven't seen enough of him at third to make that judgment. He has a decent arm from the hole.

 

I guess there would be the issue of his power. I don't see him hitting 20-25 HR , but I do believe he'd smack a bunch of doubles.

Posted
The rest of Young's contract is 3/48. Why not just grab Beltre at that rate?

 

That's what I was thinking. The one reason I could come up with would be is that you know what you would get with Young year in and year out. However, I wouldn't make the move for Young.

Posted
Youk is done for the season, and with him goes any hope for the Sox this season.

[/url]

 

I concur, this is probably the nail in the coffin for any hope the Sox had to make the playoffs this season. Injuries have really plagued the team this year between Beckett, Ellsbury, V-Mart, Pedroia and now Youkilis.

Posted
I shouldn't have to lecture you about the difference between serving in a role and being defined by it. So I won't insult your intelligence by assuming you don't know the difference.

 

Lowrie will play backup infield next year. That does not mean that he is no more than a utility man. It simply means that that's his best role next year, much like Youkilis best served the team as a backup 3B in 2004 and 2005 at a similar age. (OK OK, the team should have moved him to first in 2005 instead of screwing around with Millar and Petagine and Olderdude and who knows who, but still)

 

Lowrie might end up being the sox starting 3b next yr

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'd move a prospect and ask the Rangers to eat about $5M/year' date=' and if they did, I'd take on the rest.[/quote']

They just went to auction as a bankrupt franchise. Good luck with that.

Posted
That's what I meant by my post. There isn't an opening on this team for him right now and I really don't see them going into next season with him as their starting 3B.

 

the poster you responded to was talking long term, not just next year

Posted
And the Youkilis injury is the nail in the coffin. They're down 7 in the L column and now lose their best hitter for the season. Interesting to see how the offseason goes

 

they're still very much alive

Posted
Carlos Delgado is working out for the Sox this week. He hasn't played in a year, but during his last full season in 2008, he hit 38 HR with .871 OPS. Even during his short stint in 2009, he played well. I see them outbidding for him to end this season and seeing what he can do.
Posted
The interesting thing about Delgado is that if he comes up, hits and makes an impact, he'd stand a chance of being at least a Type B FA if some other team decided to invest in a DH.
Posted
They just went to auction as a bankrupt franchise. Good luck with that.

 

I don't think that enters into it. I'd be saving them what, $11M a year and offering them a prospect? If anything, a cash strapped team jumps at that all the harder. That and they're under new ownership so the brokishness of the old one isn't as much of a factor.

Posted
The interesting thing about Delgado is that if he comes up' date=' hits and makes an impact, he'd stand a chance of being at least a Type B FA if some other team decided to invest in a DH.[/quote']

 

Aren't free agents generally rated on their last two years? Between 2009, and 2010, he's only played one and half months. He doesn't even show up on Elias rankings now.

Posted
Consider that Eric Gagne was a Type A free agent when Texas signed him in 2006. Unless they tweaked the formula it seems to be based on what you do, not how often you do it.
Posted
it's way too early to be counting games in the loss column. there are 50 games left and the sox play the yankees 10 times and the rays 6 times. they're going to have to play a dominant stretch of baseball to make the playoffs, but they're still in control of their destiny at this point
Posted

Agreed, the Rockies were 6 games back in September of 2007, and they still got there.

 

 

In other news, Okajima is feeling discomfort in his hamstring and they rushed him to the trainer after his outing last night. Why couldn't he have been feeling discomfort at the beginning of the season?

Posted
Agreed, the Rockies were 6 games back in September of 2007, and they still got there.

 

 

In other news, Okajima is feeling discomfort in his hamstring and they rushed him to the trainer after his outing last night. Why couldn't he have been feeling discomfort at the beginning of the season?

 

i'd much rather see richardson in the bullpen than okajima. richardson hasn't spent much time in the majors, but he's done well in the chances he's been given

Posted
it's way too early to be counting games in the loss column. there are 50 games left and the sox play the yankees 10 times and the rays 6 times. they're going to have to play a dominant stretch of baseball to make the playoffs' date=' but they're still in control of their destiny at this point[/quote']

 

and the next 4 are being played without Pedroia or Youkilis and with a sox pen that is significantly worse than years past. The fact is, the Rockies made it in 07 because, A. they went on an unprecedented run, and B. They are in the NL West, the AAA of all divisions. Mark it now. The Youkilis injury ended the sox chances of catching the Yankees. Period

Posted
and the next 4 are being played without Pedroia or Youkilis and with a sox pen that is significantly worse than years past. The fact is' date=' the Rockies made it in 07 because, A. they went on an unprecedented run, and B. They are in the NL West, the AAA of all divisions. Mark it now. The Youkilis injury ended the sox chances of catching the Yankees. Period[/quote']

 

if only the season was 4 months long, eh? unfortunately for you and the yankees, there's still plenty of time left and this is the healthiest the sox have been in a long time

 

anyone who understands baseball knows that anything can happen

Posted
and the next 4 are being played without Pedroia or Youkilis and with a sox pen that is significantly worse than years past. The fact is' date=' the Rockies made it in 07 because, A. they went on an unprecedented run, and B. They are in the NL West, the AAA of all divisions. Mark it now. The Youkilis injury ended the sox chances of catching the Yankees. Period[/quote']

 

The pitching heavily favors the Red Sox this weekend. Them winning three out of four is a legitimate possibility.

Posted
and the next 4 are being played without Pedroia or Youkilis and with a sox pen that is significantly worse than years past. The fact is' date=' the Rockies made it in 07 because, A. they went on an unprecedented run, and B. They are in the NL West, the AAA of all divisions. Mark it now. The Youkilis injury ended the sox chances of catching the Yankees. Period[/quote']

 

 

In all fairness, I thought that the Red Sox were out of the playoffs before the Youkilis injury.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...