Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Wow, last time I ever try to argue rationally with yankee fans. I swear that place is almost as bad as YES.

You just used "rational" and "Yankee fan" in the same sentence; you should know better than that. :D

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Are U Kidding me,

 

It sounds to me like your jealous of all of Boston's illustrious success and you are resorting to your 7th grade ways by calling Irish Jay a moron!! ( LAUGHTER). Maybe sometime in this century one of your New York teams will win a title....Nothing that happened last century means anything now buster!! You just can't seem to get over the fact that Boston owns championships these days.....

 

Now move on Irish Jay has DISMISSED you!!

why?...because nothing that haooened last c entury benefited you??

Posted
this whole arguement that you yankee fans have resorted to is comical. you guys cant win one for a few years and you have to say "we are better because we won 26 titles in the last 100 years". i guess the 49rs or the cowboys are the greatest because they USE TO BE great...thats a joke because they suck RIGHT NOW. just like you guys suck RIGHT NOW. and yes before you start, you suck when you blow a 3-0 lead in the alcs. the RED SOX are the WORLD CHAMPS RIGHT NOW!!! that is what matters RIGHT NOW.

how do you figure we suck right now?...we're in second place...for the past 7 years you guys have finished in second place...did you suck all 7 o those years? NO, you won a World Series last year, the Wild Card the year before, the Wild Card in 99, etc..

 

I love how you guys say we're irrational, but its you guys always sayin we suck because you beat us last year....its ********, like we're the worst team in baseball because we lost a series, and we're stupid because we make argueents that are totally justified (26 to 6, 1918 for the last few years, etc..)...we cant use 1918 anymore, give us a break we have to use something :)

Posted
I love how you guys say we're irrational, but its you guys always sayin we suck because you beat us last year....its ********, like we're the worst team in baseball because we lost a series, and we're stupid because we make argueents that are totally justified (26 to 6, 1918 for the last few years, etc..)...we cant use 1918 anymore, give us a break we have to use something

 

ahh do we keep saying that? :( im sowwy :lol: . well if you guys are using 1918 and 26 to 6 to get at us, that gives more than a reason to recount last October's playoffs. check and mate

Posted

 

I can't say I blame New York fans for being so happy to beat a team from Boston. I mean when is the last time New York City has seen a title? the year 2000!? (LAUGHTER :lol: ).

QUOTE]

 

 

 

WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME THE SOX WON A TITLE BESIDES LAST YEAR???? LIKE 86 YEARS AGO?! (LAUGHTER :harhar: )

bro, i love how you had to rob the idea of my username

Posted
ahh do we keep saying that? :( im sowwy :lol: . well if you guys are using 1918 and 26 to 6, that gives more than a reason to recount last October's playoffs. check and mate

um...yea you guys do say that

Posted
um...yea you guys do say that

 

wow you are friggin slow if you didnt even notice the sarcasm in my post. yes we do take that to you guys cuz all we heard from yankee fans was 1918. now its 26-6. Im sure if things were in reverse that yanks beat the Sox in the fashion that was last October, youd be pulling the exat same thing on the sox fans here.

Posted

Well in the 21st century it's tied at 1-1, so we'll see where it goes from here.

 

Wonderful...the Yankees leadership role has now shifted to KB. Please, just for once, leave the first inning unscathed.

Posted
The Red Sox and Yankees are rivals, and so accordingly are their fans. I don't understand why you are having an argument about stupid meaningless sayings that fans say. So what if Yankees fans say 26-6 all the time? I'm sure it means just about as much to Red Sox fans as "Yankees Suck" means to Yankees fans.
Posted
wow you are friggin slow if you didnt even notice the sarcasm in my post. yes we do take that to you guys cuz all we heard from yankee fans was 1918. now its 26-6. Im sure if things were in reverse that yanks beat the Sox in the fashion that was last October, youd be pulling the exat same thing on the sox fans here.

i'd be bragging about beating you, not about coming back from 0-3

 

26 to 6 is just a saying I got off of one of Vinnys T-Shirts...you guys take it too literal like im rubbing it in right now...trust me, im aware that we're in second place, im aware that you guys are the defending champs, im aware that we lost last year, but im also aware that we have 20 more championships than you......and the only reason I have 26 to 6 as my username is as defense because of all the ******** i knew i was going to take here...and appearantly i was right because i take lots of ******** from you guys...but wutever its cool

 

BTW, ts not the true fans that are irrational, its the frontrunners that dont know anything...as some of the members here can tell you, im capable of having pretty rational conversations concerning the Yanks and Sox, and so are many other Yankee fans.

Posted

BTW, ts not the true fans that are irrational, its the frontrunners that dont know anything...as some of the members here can tell you, im capable of having pretty rational conversations concerning the Yanks and Sox, and so are many other Yankee fans.

This is true a lot of the newbies jump on 26-6 for the sake of jumping because of his user name and sig, but his is actually very capable of having good insightful baseball conversation.

Posted
well then dont complain about sox fans boasting about the October win, if its alright for you to say 26-6. Thats little one-sided thinking

i didnt complain about you guys boasting, i complained that you guys labeled all Yankee fans as irrational. Its you guys complaining about the 26 to 6 thing. My saying 26 to 6 is like your avatar saying "Defending Champs". The purpose of the avatar is to represent the fact that you guys are the defending champs, and rightfully so. My username is representing the fact that we have 26 championships (also rightfully so) compared to your 6.

Posted
besides really if the sox all of 2005 were to have Schilling, Foulke, and Miller all in their forms of 2004. The Standings could have seen a "White Sox type" lead than it is now

If RJ had his stuff consistently, if Wright didn't disappear of the face of the baseball planet, ditto with Pavano, if Bernie had something left in the tank, if Tino didn't slump so badly, IF injuries would just give us a break - I think the Yankees totally own in this "if" department you are talking about.

 

26-6: Did you see the Yankees "Numbers Don't Lie" t-shirt? :D

Posted
If RJ had his stuff consistently, if Wright didn't disappear of the face of the baseball planet, ditto with Pavano, if Bernie had something left in the tank, if Tino didn't slump so badly, IF injuries would just give us a break - I think the Yankees totally own in this "if" department you are talking about.

 

26-6: Did you see the Yankees "Numbers Don't Lie" t-shirt? :D

na i havent seen it yet lol....is it one of Vinny's shirts or is it being sold by someone else??

 

lmao sounds pretty funny...

 

 

...your post is 100% correct...we were being billed as the best team ever in spring training...so we definatly win in the "IF" dept.

Posted

Vinny's shirt? Umm, this is official Nike gear! I thought I saw a commercial by Nike celebrating the Sox breaking the curse - pick a side already. :rolleyes:

 

http://www.footballfanatics.com/images/products/FF114802-xl.jpg

 

And there's a baseball cap of that, too:

http://www.footballfanatics.com/images/products/FF110297-s.jpg

 

Start placing your order...lol, I saw this a couple months ago, and it just flew off the racks at the MLB store. I also saw a "Even Idiots Get Lucky" shirt too...harhar. :lol:

Posted

...your post is 100% correct...we were being billed as the best team ever in spring training...so we definatly win in the "IF" dept.

No kidding. I remember ESPN picking the best things about each division, and pretty much the only category we weren't good at in the AL East was fielding (would we be this bad...that remained to be seen). And then there's the WS predictions; Yankees-Cardinals, or Braves, or something, but the majority had the Yankees in there.

 

Now not ONE writer on ESPN picks the Yankees to make the postseason...I guess it's not "early" anymore, is it?

Posted
No kidding. I remember ESPN picking the best things about each division, and pretty much the only category we weren't good at in the AL East was fielding (would we be this bad...that remained to be seen). And then there's the WS predictions; Yankees-Cardinals, or Braves, or something, but the majority had the Yankees in there.

 

Now not ONE writer on ESPN picks the Yankees to pick the postseason...I guess it's not "early" anymore, is it?

guess not

 

OK its a Nike shirt, so its not one of Vinny's. (Vinny Milano, who sells all those shirts on River Ave...he basically started the whole 1918 shirt frenzy, and also made the "26 2 6" shirt this year...it says 26 2 6 on a NYS Liscense Plate on the shirt)

Posted
i'd be bragging about beating you, not about coming back from 0-3

 

26 to 6 is just a saying I got off of one of Vinnys T-Shirts...you guys take it too literal like im rubbing it in right now...trust me, im aware that we're in second place, im aware that you guys are the defending champs, im aware that we lost last year, but im also aware that we have 20 more championships than you......and the only reason I have 26 to 6 as my username is as defense because of all the ******** i knew i was going to take here...and appearantly i was right because i take lots of ******** from you guys...but wutever its cool

 

BTW, ts not the true fans that are irrational, its the frontrunners that dont know anything...as some of the members here can tell you, im capable of having pretty rational conversations concerning the Yanks and Sox, and so are many other Yankee fans.

"you take it too literal like im rubbing it in..." are you trying to say your not rubbing it in??? when you say something 100 times its hard to think otherwise. but then again its really all you can say. i would rather be the current world champ and not the multiple champ of years ago because im living right now.

Posted
"you take it too literal like im rubbing it in..." are you trying to say your not rubbing it in??? when you say something 100 times its hard to think otherwise. but then again its really all you can say. i would rather be the current world champ and not the multiple champ of years ago because im living right now.

 

Do you mean you wouldn't trade the Sox history for the Yankees history?

Posted
No, jackass, can you not read what he's saying? Who cares what you've done in the past? We're World Champions NOW and that would be all that matters.

*Defending World Champions

Posted
Calm down. You are still the world champs but once you reach the season you become the defending champs. Are you still celebrating or playing the season in hopes of defending your title? That is the difference between defending world champs and world champs.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Calm down. You are still the world champs but once you reach the season you become the defending champs. Are you still celebrating or playing the season in hopes of defending your title? That is the difference between defending world champs and world champs.

Tomato, tomahto.......we're the Champs until someone else is.

Posted
Calm down. You are still the world champs but once you reach the season you become the defending champs. Are you still celebrating or playing the season in hopes of defending your title? That is the difference between defending world champs and world champs.

has there ever been a defending world champ that wasnt the current champ? or do you still not understand?

Posted

Why is it called "World Series" if there's only one country in it? There are "international" players in MLB? Still doesn't make much sense though. In fact, when it was Yankees-Mets - that's one CITY...ok yeah, just wondered about that? :dunno:

 

Over-analyze, much, yes. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...