Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    55,183
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. I think Mookie himself is a prime candidate. There was plenty of buzz that he was adamant in his desire to test free agency, and turning down a 10 year $300mill contract certainly lends support…
  2. Bloom gets criticized even by his supporters. Dgalehouse lives in a fantasy world. The only thing I liked about the Story contract was it dispelled (or should have) the Tampa North rhetoric. Beyond that, I stand by my assessment that Story is an expensive Paul DeJong…
  3. How many people remember the name of the GM who traded Miguel Cabrera to Detroit?
  4. The problem with all these grading websites is they live in a world where there were other options. I’m all for believing there were discussions involving better players no one published, but I also believe for obvious reasons they didn’t get very far. There were 3 options I mentioned above. So option 1 is a D in your opinion. But which of options 2 or 3 represented a better grade?
  5. That’s because dgalehouse thinks MLB is a redraft fantasy league with no long term repercussions beyond the current calendar year…
  6. Actually he did pretty well when you look at the history of these superstar deals. He had three options. 1. The Dodgers package headlined by Verdugo 2. The Padres package that included Wil Myers, Joey Lucchesi and (I think) Cal Quantrill 3. Hold Mookie for one 60 game season on a team that eventually lost Chris Sale and would not have had Price on the mound, but would still be paying him $31million today. What was the right choice?
  7. Nobody patted Bloom on the back for dealing Mookie. But it was the right move. Mookie already turned down $300milliom and wasn’t going to save that awful 2020 team that would later lose Chris Sale for the season anyway…
  8. At least he stopped justifying emptying the farm based on the prospects’ performance. I’m sure Kopech’s emergence and Espinal’s All Star appearance has nothing to do with that. There’s nothing wrong with supporting the 2018 victory in defense of these deals. But pretending they aren’t still debts, bad contracts and less farm left over from that spending binge is flat out ignorant. 2018 was great. But the Sox are still paying some of the bills. Not the GMs fault…
  9. The important thing to remember here is dgalehouse will be the first poster to tell you how respectful he is of others’ opinions and how he doesn’t engage in derogatory behavior.
  10. But tearing everything down would be stupid. The Sox are being dragged down by a few contracts they will never be able to move, like Sale. And some would say, Story. Moving Devers to cover this would be stupid…
  11. The 2007 Sox were hardly homegrown. Youkilis, Pedroia, Papelbon, Lester. And maybe some ancillary pieces. I think Ellsbury debuted, but he wasn’t central…
  12. At the time last July, Duran had roughly the same value as Berrios on BTV. I pointed this out and wanted that deal done. That, as far as I know, is the one and only link. No one has stated Minnesota (or any team) wanted Duran. But that statement does show how incredibly stupid Stork is. He’s trying to blame Bloom for overvaluing Duran, but he’s doing so in a way that says “lots of GMs overvalued Duran and would give up a top tier starter for him.” But Bloom was the problem? And the weird part is, he probably still won’t understand that…
  13. An equivalent package from Boston per BTV would have been Casas, Yorke and Mata…
  14. No one has ever needed Bob Lobel. Not ever…
  15. Well to date we’ve heard 1. JD Martinez is widely rumored to be available, and 2. The Sox are still trying to make a playoff push. I wouldn’t call being buyers and sellers an option; I’d call it Today’s Plans…
  16. He’s really not doing that. He’s just pointing out the real end of the Betts Saga. I have probably been DD’s biggest critic, but I do acknowledge he made Betts a very fair - and some say ridiculous - offer, just that Mookie wanted more. Extending Betts didn’t happen under DD. Moving Betts happened under Bloom…
  17. But MADSTORK said we could have had Berrios for Duran. As far as I know, the only person suggesting that that deal was even a possibility was me and it was based solely on BTV valuations. I never saw anything anywhere indicating Minnesota had even the slightest interest in Duran. And Toronto’s offer also looked helluva lot better….
  18. $217 million counts as “splurging” under every definition of the word. If you like, the cumulative ROI for the roughly $650mill spent on those players is one ring (and counting)…
  19. “And the completely mindless troll on anonymous message boards” - notin
  20. His name sounds like Beat-ER, not Beat-EE. He’s the administrator, not the recipient. This is not former Yankee RHP Jim….
  21. The ROI on Sandoval, Hanley, Rusney, Price, and Sale?
  22. Credibility doesn’t pay the bills. Ratings do…
  23. JD (who matches up with Bellinger, not Eovaldi) and Eovaldi for Bellinger and AA RHP Clayton Beeter…
  24. Apocalyptic?
  25. On BTV, Eovaldi has the roughly the same value as Cody Bellinger. Bellinger is a bizarre case as he has gone from MVP to non-tender candidate. The Dodgers might actually consider moving him. (Might? Yeah right! If they find a taker, he gone.) But would/should the Sox even bother? The cons (pricey, non-productive) do outweigh the pros (former MVP capable of monstrous numbers and short term deal)….
×
×
  • Create New...