Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    52,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. My people have spoken!! Only to be put on “ignore”…
  2. If they did, would there still be a lockout?
  3. I’d rather see the shift gone, too, but not due to a league wide regulation. Make it go away (or at least get used less) by defeating it. I know this doesn’t always work. NFL teams have been crushing the vaunted “prevent defense” for decades now and exploited it for probably hundreds of game-winning field goals. And you still see it. But maybe not as much. Maybe…
  4. I will sleep more soundly now…
  5. That’s pretty odd logic to condone banning the shift…
  6. Wait?!! What!?!!?
  7. You might feel differently if you were a Pirates fan…
  8. Hey I was surprised awhile back when I pointed out the worst players in MLB are better at baseball (not MLB - baseball) than any of us are at anything, and numerous people disagreed…
  9. Pitch clock, yes. It’s been in the rule book for decades. Why not just enforce it? The shift is unpopular, but it’s just a defensive alignment. It’s a strategy. Are we going to keep banning strategies? Maybe baseball should ban the hit and run play as well? How about MLB also bans having corner infielders guard the lines late in games, too? And infielders “cheating” up the middle for double play depth? These players are also out of position! Ban those strategies!! Why end with just the shift?
  10. No. The point was the worst players you can think are still closer to being Mike Trout than any of us ever were to them…
  11. MLB seems to like to outlaw strategies and not obvious flaws. At least they finally decided allowing all 40 players on the active roster for one month really caused more problems than it solved…
  12. It’s a stupid change. What’s next? Circles on the field for areas where players are allowed to stand?
  13. So you skipped 2020?
  14. Pick your age. It still isn’t close…
  15. He’s wrong, but let’s not overlook how talented the next 1200 really are. Franchy Cordero is closer to Mike Trout than any of us or anyone any of us ever played with in high school is to Franchy Cordero…
  16. Those of us from just outside finish our sentences. What’s the Alma mater?
  17. The sac fly thing would be easy to figure out the impact. How many more hits Ty Cobb might have gotten on artificial turf is more troublesome…
  18. Yes. At least once, but it did garner a lot of attention…
  19. The sets of “America’s best athletes” and “America’s best baseball players” might not have as much overlap as you think…
  20. Are you sure? I have heard stories that several of them came from another Galaxy and only traveled to Earth to make money in an effort to bolster the economy on their home planets. No way John Fisher is from Earth. Not gonna believe it. Ever…
  21. The relative competition aspect is true. But even now, there is a large percentage of the current 1200 with weak fundamentals. That percentage is only likely to get bigger. And while the greater number of pitchers with weak control might be offset by the greater number with weaker plate discipline, I think overall that would lead to a weaker product overall. I mean, if you already don’t like walks and strikeouts, this change won’t excite you much…
  22. Unless the next 1200 are weaker fielders or cannot throw strikes…
  23. But agents do negotiate with the long ball, as opposed to how often the LHH puts the ball into the hole between short and third…
  24. Because home runs can equate to money…
×
×
  • Create New...