Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    52,204

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. notin
    Not since Price. Unless you count Sale…
  2. notin
    Again I’ll use today’s terminology Relievers are not “hit or miss” pitchers. But “hit or miss” pitchers do usually end up as relievers.
  3. notin
    I don’t think it should be used, but I stand by it being better than awards or awards and OPS or whatever…
  4. notin
    Might as well make it alphabetical. I think we can all agree that Tim Anderson should be paid more than Angel Zerpa. So clearly this system is perfect. Or at least as good as awards…
  5. notin
    Right. Your point was fWAR has too much flux and therefore is less concrete than the collective opinions of the BBWAA. You know, the people who thought Pedro Martinez was less valuable than Pudge Rodriguez, because Pudge had a .931 OPS and a Gold Glove. In that same year, Mike Lieberthal of the Phillies had a .931 OPS and a Gold Glove and didn’t get a single MVP vote. So the transitive property tells us in the NL, Pedro was practically worthless that year. As I said before, fWAR should NEVER be used for compensation. But that doesn’t mean any other completely random system like awards is better…
  6. notin
    That’s how Hack Wilson got to 191…
  7. notin
    You’re missing the point altogether. Bear in mind whatever Fangraphs does means nothing to actual player compensation. They’re just doing their best to perfect their craft. If it was to be used for compensation, they would not be allowed to tweak it. And if you are going to pretend “real stats” are etched in stone, bear in mind it is not as thorough as you think…
  8. notin
    Pay him retroactively. See my Gentile story above. If fWAR does get tied to compensation - which would be bad - the formulas would have to be locked down or either the union or the owners would absolutely scream. That impartial and independent Fangraphs is tweaking their work with no financial ramifications is inconsequential…
  9. notin
    Again, not true. While rare, stats do change over time. Some 20 years ago, I was listening to a White Sox-Orioles game during my commute. Before the game, there was a ceremony where former Oriole great Jim Gentile was awarded $5000 because he had a clause in his contract in 1961 that he would receive that money if he won the RBI title. Some 40 years later, the found some long-hidden RBI and it tied him with Maris for the crown. So maybe it was etched in limestone?
  10. notin
    So until then, a popularity contest among members of the BBWAA seems crystal clear? It’s probably worth noting that by their own admission, the BBWAA members don’t even agree what the word “valuable” in MVP means. If these are the two options, I take the variable math. At least it’s math and not a collection of opinions…
  11. notin
    Not at all, and (with the exception of moving Whitlock to the rotation) they’re not the pitchers I’m talking about replacing…
  12. notin
    Incorrect. Good relievers, like good starters, are not hit and miss. I’m not implying get the bullpen equivalents of Wacha and Hill, but pay for the elite relievers. If nothing else, elite relievers cost less than elite starters and typically require fewer years…
  13. notin
    But just because fielding metrics are more difficult to calculate doesn’t mean they should be ignored, does it?
  14. notin
    So are you saying awards have more tangible merit than fWAR?
  15. notin
    Or one or two good relievers and just committed to moving both Houck and Whitlock to the bullpen…
  16. notin
    Some folks just use these boards to vent frustration, too. Sometimes a good well-placed sarcastic response can kick them back into reality. Usually not. But that doesn’t make out less fun…
  17. notin
    He only hit .211 as a Ranger. The real surprise is the .360 SLG. I mean, Kevin Plawecki is slugging .355 as a member of the Red Sox and Jonathan Arauz is slugging .326. Those are not names that one should be comparing to Gallo…
  18. notin
    That whole proposal was just stupid. I like what the folks at Fangraphs do, but a big reason they have any reliability is they’re completely impartial. Giving them leverage over financials opens way too many doors best left closed. And boarded up. And then burned to the ground…
  19. notin
    But passing up the opportunity for some quality sarcasm is just not me…
  20. notin
    If the expectations from Story are “better defensively but worse offensively” I think those are reasonable ….
  21. notin
    The guy has had one full season!! And so far - no titles!!! What does he need - two seasons? Are we going to stand for that!?!?!
  22. notin
    Or he just got flat out pummeled….
  23. notin
    Well don’t forget the San Diego GM at the time was Jed Hoyer, who previous job was as one of those talent evaluators in Boston. Hoyer then went to the Cubs where he traded for Rizzo again…
  24. notin
    In that respect, he is also the new Ryan Weber…
  25. notin
    Austin Davis is my new Ryan Weber - the name I expect to be called for every DFA or demotion…
×
×
  • Create New...