Replacing Mookie was never going to happen. If you think he did poorly because all the pundits gave the trade a D, what better option did he pass on? (Disclosure - I preferred the original Verdugo/Graterol deal at the time. And despite Graterol’s health struggles, I still do.)
But it’s not like 29 teams were throwing their best names at Boston and Bloom just chose poorly. His options were limited. He could:
1) have held Betts and Price (whom the Sox would still be paying $31mill to) for one more season. He really couldn’t re-sign Betts because Mookie wanted a ton of money and Henry wanted to reset the limit, which becomes impossible while paying full price Mookie and Price
2) traded him to LA as we saw
3) traded him and Price to San Diego for Wil Myers, one of Cal Quantrill or Joey Lucchesi, and one of Manny Margot or Josh Naylor.
That’s it. Those are the options. So if 2 is a D, which of 1 or 3 was better?
I suspect you’ll ignore the question and continue to complain while pretending there were dozens of better offers that were refused for no reason whatsoever…