Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    51,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. The Sox weren’t even the best team in the AL East in 2003 and 2004, if W-L records mean anything....
  2. It is possible (and hopefully unlikely) they sell high on Bradley. But I’m not so sure about Castillo. Dombrowski attended Castillo’s tryout and reportedly left with the opinion that Castillo was, and I quote, “a fourth outfielder.” Maybe a few years in Pawtucket has changed DD’s opinion. But has it changed it enough to take on the remainder of that contract? I’m doubtful it’s increased that much....
  3. Some players certainly adhere to that code, but some don’t, which is also probable. For example, a couple years ago Scott Van Slyke of the Dodgers publicly talked about how his teammates, notably his friend Clayton Kershaw, were fed up with Yasiel Puig. And I wouldn’t consider it improbable that Pedroia told his teammates NOT to retaliate and escalate the situation, but Barnes did anyway. That’s a story that makes every piece fit, and actually, unlike the popular belief, even explains why Pedroia reacted at all. And that’s just one possibility. Like I aid, I’m at least open to that and other possibilities, and with an equal amount of proof that anyone has for anything else. And by the way, your Kimbrel/unicorn scenario is actually NOT possible...
  4. I’m not sure, and that would certainly depend on the Sox off-season plans. But if a recent comparison can be found for a deal involving a similar player to ERod, that is a good starting point...
  5. Nope. I have nothing except alternative theories that counter the popular but equally unsupported beliefs of others. You know, keep an open mind kind of stuff. My entire stance on this has always been that none of us has the whole story and really, until we do (if ever), any discussion really needs to acknowledge other interpretations. But a lot of people do seem close-minded to the existence of alternative possibilities....
  6. Exactly. I made that same point somewhere on another thread....
  7. Eh. Given Dombrowski’s draft history, is dropping 10 spots really a deterrent? At some point the spending will get cut off. Maybe it is this off-season. But maybe not...
  8. We have a GM who likes trading, no farm system to trade from, and the possibility of multiple needs. There are certainly reasons to keep ERod, but I do doubt he is untouchable and could be dealt for the right price...
  9. The idea of trading one player to replace him with a more expensive free agent? I wouldn’t be surprised if DD traded Bogaerts and signed Machado. If he did try to deal for Machado last off-season, presumably there was also a plan to extend him. This move doesn’t appear that it would be very popular with a lot of Sox fans, and maybe, like a lot of people, DD has soured on Machado since then. Or maybe not...
  10. Reggie Williams. What sport hasn’t had a Reggie Williams?
  11. While we wax on this postseason season to date, I think special mention needs to go to handing the Yankees their worst loss in postseason history and doing so on their field in front of their fans. That in itself makes this postseason enjoyable...
  12. Unless DD trades ERod...
  13. Well my point was two parts - that the players weren’t and the fans are the ones who still are...
  14. And really, even though the money was a lot less, Dombrowski did trade Shaw and sign the more expensive Moreland...
  15. It doesn’t? This is a GM who lost a Victor Martinez for the season and replaced him by giving Prince Fielder one of the biggest contracts in history. And at a time when interest in Fielder was minimal, to be kind. Also with one year left and an agent named Boras, this might be viewed as the ideal time to move breakout player Bogaerts. I’m not a proponent of this strategy, but it’s not unrealistic. After all, DD reportedly tried to trade Bogaerts for the more expensive Machado last off-season...
  16. Some of that was for fan safety with those dangerous maple bats...
  17. But if only the fans are upset, that agrees with my point. I think none of us have the entire story...
  18. I’m not so sure, and a few people posted links about how overblown that whole situation was...
  19. Well there is a certain wildly unpopular free agent shortstop that Dombrowski has reportedly tried to acquire before...
  20. I expect at least one of Dalbec or Chavis to be in MLB next year. But not in Boston...
  21. 4 years for a pitcher whose had TJ TWICE????!?!?! Ignoring health and basing a contract on postseason numbers sounds like the exact logic that justified signing Pablo Sandoval...
  22. Hasn’t that been covered to death by the media as something fans seem to be overreacting to way more than the players are?
  23. The Sox do have a lot of those players for 2019 already. As Dombrowski is a big time trader and really, has not much in the farm to deal, who will he put on the market? I think, besides one or both of Chavis and Dalbec, the Sox might entertain deals for Rodriguez and Swihart. A third possibility is Bogaerts, but interest might be lessened once the Cubs make Addison Russell available at a discount...
  24. Game 2 of the World Series is October 24. He should have 5 days rest by then. So yes he does...
  25. And there is precedent for not making a pitcher with injury issues a closer. The Cubs tried to go that route with Brandon Morrow this season. And this year, the Cubs might be the biggest suitors for Kimbrel, even if/when they sign Machado or Harper...
×
×
  • Create New...