Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    51,997
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. Maybe. Laureano has been hot recently, but this will be his 6th in less than 3 seasons, and he’s not bouncing around like that because he’s always awesome…
  2. You make it sound like a love triangle…
  3. That does make his acquisition less likely…
  4. Olney says they’re still having talks about Suarez and Cease…
  5. This all started with the unspent Devers savings. If it goes to (the right) extensions, I’m more than fine with that…
  6. I hope they make other plans. This guy keeps injuring himself with routine baseball activities. That’s ok for someone like me, whom did not make his living playing baseball. But for Casas, it’s a concern…
  7. Not all for $30mill, which was the subject at hand…
  8. That should plug the final leak in that Padres bullpen. Opposing teams now need to do all their scoring in the first 5 innings…
  9. True. The multi-position guys can see their UZR artificially inflated if they’re any good defensively. I call this Zobristing
  10. Some defensive metrics do trend towards being cumulative. You cannot save as many defensive runs if you’re not on the field. UZR also seems to favor players who play multiple positions…
  11. I would like to see the trades ranked by the combined weight of all the exchanged players from heaviest to lightest…
  12. He did extend Rafaela, sign a GG third baseman, and bring in a good defensive catcher. Sox defense is really only weak at 2b, at least until Mayer returns. 1b is arguable as part timers have a disadvantage on metrics…
  13. Marte has made one start in the OF. CES has played 65 games in the past two years. It’s hard to establish any WAR when you’re not playing. Don’t forget; WAR trends towards being cumulative. In this case, I know his 2024 was marred with injuries. I thought Hayes was an odd fit, especially for a team with fringey outfielders.
  14. Suarez and Schwarber will be free agents. Wheeler is talking about retiring. Nola is already falling apart. And they had no closer. Oh and the Mets are right there. Their urgency is not surprising…
  15. He also could return to 2b. Not like Hamilton is killing it…
  16. Most confusing leaguewide trade from day one. - Ke’Bryan Hayes to the Reds. With Noelvi Marte, Spencer Steer, Christian Encarnacion-Strand, Santiago Espinal and whoever is in their minors, not sure about the logic here. “We have a lot of corner infielders, but what we’re missing is one with an OPS+ of 60 and is still owed over $36million.”
  17. SP and a 1b. Although the 1b market looks weak…
  18. I do think Password is a prime trade candidate, as he is pretty blocked from the Sox OF. But I think if he is dealt in the next 24 hours, it might make more sense to deal him for Carter Jensen in KC. Given the depth of each team at OF and catcher, some stars do align. Tibbs ($9.1mill ) alone is a perfect BTV matchup for Cease (also $9.1mill), but I think they might prefer a corner OF who is a bit more MLB-ready…
  19. Apparently not as obvious as you think. Before trading Devers, the Sox averaged 4.84 runs per game. Since the trade, they are averaging 3.83 runs per game. It’s not hitters picking up the slack. The improvement has been the pitching…
  20. Most likely they add a good arm to the pen not expected to close. Someone like Louis Varland, Kevin Ginkel, Calvin Faucher. Maybe the return of John Schreiber. I think someone to take some workload away from Whitlock, Weissert and Bernardino is the goal…
  21. What about that trade? Trading good relievers for bad position players doesn’t mean WAR undervalues relievers. Simple question - why was trading Devers not a white flag but trading Chapman is? Let’s not lose sight of where this started…
  22. That whole bullpen had plenty of issues. Before acquiring Kim (all but forgotten in the postseason) the Sox only blew 4 ninth inning leads, resulting in 3 losses. Through 54 games this year, Chapman had 2 losses (although both games were tied when he entered). 2003 was not so much a bad closer as a horrible bullpen that failed much more often in the 7th and 8th innings…
  23. Is this your version of the “WAR undervalued closers” argument? The counter argument is fans overvalue closers. That Chapman only pitches 60 innings is why he actually is less important than the best hitter in the lineup. The one charged with getting him leads to protect. And Chapman’s innings won’t be the”most important” either. Some sites used to track “tough saves”, saves where the closer comes in with the tying run on base. They almost never happen. The league leader usually had like 4. Trading Devers - who did have a bad attitude - was a bigger blow to this lineup than dealing Chapman would be. I don’t see how you can say otherwise…
  24. For his career, Hicks’ numbers are pretty much the same across all leverage situations defined by B-R. He is only slightly better as a reliever than a starter, but he does have more career IP as a reliever. And his second best ERA comes in the 9th inning, substantially better than in the 7th and 8th. His 2nd inning ERA is his best, which is actually kind of odd. He has 35 career saves and 13 career blown saves. Blown save numbers can be misleading, but the bulk of them came his rookie year (2018) when he was closing. I think he’s adequate, but it would be nice to have better arms behind him…
×
×
  • Create New...