notin
-
Posts
53,612 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
45
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by notin
-
Six whole starts? He's cured!!!!
-
BTV still had him at negative trade value at half his price...
-
Because per your argument, Price had positive trade value despite his declining WAR and massive salary. If he had positive trade value, why not deal him separately...
-
It was not. Verdugo alone had more value than Betts at the time. Price had negative trade value comparable to that of Wil Myers at the time. And Myers was a guy the Sox were taking in trade rumors in order to up the prospect return..
-
In an era where Jackie Bradley costs $11mill and Kevin Kiermaier has a 6 year $53.5 mill contract, what is your definition of cheap as it applies to Tolan? Bench also had 4 Gold Gloves and an MVP under his belt prior to 1972 (when he got his 5th Gold Glove and 2nd MVP). Comparable recent catchers might be Posey or Mauer, neither of whom were/are cheap...
-
We did trade him to get Brock Holt. I'm calling that a win for the Sox... -
Something Tai Walker will not solve for a full season...
-
And looking at Johnny Bench. He lead the NL in fWAR in 1972. But teammates Joe Morgan (2nd) and Pete Rose (8th) were among the league leaders as well. Not to mention Tony Perez (26th) and Bobby Tolan (27th) had great seasons. Can teams afford to pay what those veterans would cost today? Five of the 27 best position players? The 1972 Reds, interestingly, had only one pitcher (Jack Billingham) in the top 50 in fWAR, and he was number 50...
-
I would argue it limited the return. Otherwise, why not deal Price separately?
-
No!! I can handle corporate naming on stadiums, but please no on teams. I hated that Disney named their teams the Mighty Ducks, and that's not even a true corporate name. Maybe one day teams won't even be identified by their cities, but by their owning corporations (like they do with Japanese baseball). So we could have the Nintendo Mariners playing the Liberty Media Braves? Uggh...
-
I do believe Price was unhappy, but apparently he could be bought. He did have the option to opt out after 2018...
-
Something I have always believed, too. But.... History has shown those contracts do get traded. Stanton, A-Rod, Cano, Price, Fielder, Verlander, Greinke, Kemp, Manny Ramirez. These were all among the largest contracts in the game when signed, and all of them were traded mid-contract. And I bet I forgot about one or two names. Of course, most of thir deals have been eclisped in the past 3 years by Trout, Machado, Harper, Rendon, Cole, etc. But I would imagine some of those deals will get dealt as well. (Machado will get traded. Book it.) So.. will Mookie play all 12 years in Dodger Blue? I wouldn't bank on it just yet....
-
Are you a cable TV network now?
-
You know, there was more to that post...
-
Had? Sad. Well, they had them both when the entire league only had 8 teams in it. That should have been their motto "The CFL. Eight teams. Two Rough Riders. Watch it!" Also one could argue Red Sox/White Sox are similarly named and no one cares...
-
I don't see that as an issue. The Canadian Football League has two teams named Rough Riders and no one has ever complained.
-
Well, we will always have Brian (no relation)...
-
Ah, hindsight. The best criteria for a decision. Of course, the sox could have trade him to, say, Cleveland and saw Mookie test the market. At which point, the Dodgers would certainly have interest (unless you think they committed $365 million on a whim), so the Sox still would have had serious competition re-signing him. Maybe we could have forced the Dodgers to pay more? Maybe Mookie simply wanted a change of scenery or to be out of Boston? It looks like that no matter the outcome, getting Verdugo might actually be the absolute best case scenario for the Sox...
-
Interestingly, Fangraphs listed Bonds as having 4 of the top ten seasons in fWAR, but he only made the postseason in one (2002) of those 4 seasons. Of course, if you go back before 2002 (I think) for fWAR, the numbers are calculated a bit differently because of the lack of the same type of defensive data. And if you go back before the 1990's, it does mess with your entire premise because teams were a bit more balanced economically. Johnny Bench and Willie Stargell did not monopolize a payroll the way Betts can...
-
He was drafted number 1 overall 4 years later (after college), making him the only player ever drafted number 1 overall twice. He did make MLB, but only posted a .674 OPS in 707 PA's over 7 seasons....
-
Still that draft had 3 Hall of Famers in the top 30 picks. Ironic, because the first pick that year (Danny Goodwin) might have been the biggest bust in draft history...
-
Well, you can only trade him to a team that makes an offer. Did anyone else make one? If Mookie was as deadset on testing the market as we all thought, the destination did not matter...
-
Per Soxprospects.com, the current Red Sox 40 man roster has 39 players on it, and 21 were in the organization prior to Bloom's hire. He has added 18 players to the 40 man roster. The bulk of his adds have been borderline pitchers (Mazza, Springs, Hall, Leyer, Kickham, Stock, Triggs, Covey, Valdez, Godley, Brice ) and utility infielders (Arauz, Munoz, Peraza). The remaining adds have been 2 SPs (Perez, Pivetta), a starting outfielder (Verdugo), and a backup catcher (Plawecki)...
-
The Sox could have drafted him, but they chose Jim Rice instead....
-
Of course, that was hitters only...
