notin

True, but it never cost $68 million to find out...

Even if they did not restart the club, the trademark might still be valid. Of course, this is usually the type of problem easily solved with massive amounts of cash. But new owners would probably want to brand their own way. So Portland Pioneers or something boring like that is more likely....

Some of those were two TJ surgeries ago. He's a very, very high risk and was at the time of signing and has done nothing to prove me wrong when I said so. It's a shame, because a pitcher who can throw 98mph as often as he does is indeed a rarity, although it may also be the source of the problem...

Two years after he was traded, he gave Arizona 98 innings of 2.01 ERA/209 ERA+ baseball. Will we ever get a 209ERA+ from Eovaldi in a season? Or 98 IP?

Had? Who stopped?

They did trade Buchholz...

Tht depends on the team's ability to guess how well he recovers. This is uncharted waters. With Sale, at least they know that pitchers with his problems do come back eventually, but they also (likely?) new he was a big question mark for 2020. With ERod, that is not necessarily the case...

There have been no playoffs on this contract, much less any heroics. There is time, correct. Lackey is a great example of a player who was worthless for 2 years, then missed a year, and was only really any good the last 2 years of a 5 year deal. But we all remember him positively. Thank you, 2013 postseason...

Guilty. I didn’t...

Again, not the biggest sample size. With the benefit of hindsight, has signing Eovaldi been a good move or a bad one? Now, granted, he does have 2 years left to go all Lackey on us and make it look like a good deal...

Any reason? I mean, it's better than the Portland Baseball Team. Personally, I like the name Portland Trash Pandas...

Right now there are no other MLB teams within 800 miles of Seattle. Can we get another team or two up there? Portland and Boise get my vote. If Green Bay can have football, Boise can have baseball. OK, Sacramento makes more sense from a population standpoint...

Since post times are the same, I’m thinking I was writing mine simultaneously with yours and you hadn’t published it yet...

It’s nice that you found a great inning out of the 105 he has pitched since 2018. But it doesn’t change that he’s only pitched 105 innings...

I think an attempt will be made to be competitive in 2021. It's not unheard of. The Sox have finished in last place 3 times in the last 8 years, and then finished in first place the next year after two of them, with one World Series title in one of those season to boot...

????????

I think if the Sox trade Benintendi or Vazquez (or both) to get pitching, they will still acquire other players from outside the organization to fill both/either role(s). Chavis is really a bench player anyway, and is best used in the roles he excels at (such s hitting LHP). He's the new Steve Pearce, and if his career plays out like Pearce's, he'll be fine. Now, will the Sox fill C and/or LF wth expensive players? Like Realmuto or Ozuna? Probably not. But just because pitching is the primary need does not make it the only need, and if the Sox deal one or both players for pitching, they very likely lessen the need to spend as much money on arms. As it stands now, they might only acquire one MLB starting pitcher, since they should have 4 returning if you count Pivetta (which we probably should, since Bloom clearly wanted him). As for contributions from below, Dalbec is clearly in play and Duran might be. Beyond maybe a bullpen arm or two, I don't think the farm can supply enough players to turn this into a competitive team. As it stands, even relying on both Dalbec and Duran might be too much already. But if the idea is to bulk up the pitching and depend on getting 600 PA's each from Dalbec, Munoz, Arroyo and Duran, there is no real point in improving all the pitching...

Public perception only becomes critical if the team is losing. Like I said, "chicken and beer" might have been going on forever. Let's not lose sight odf the fact hat I am saying that particulr fiasco is overblown. Do we know when it really started? I would bet prior to 2011. And probably long prior. But the Sox were losing, so "SCAPEGOAT TIME"!! It's the pitching staff. The guys not playing are in the locker room!! With BEER!! It's killing the team!!! The Sox were in first place at the end of August that year, and guess what was happening all year long in the clubhouse? It didn't become a scandal until the team collapsed...

And has been since the end of the 2018 season. Eovaldi should have been treated like a rebound girlfriend...

0 professional at bats and 18 years old and added to the player pool? I'm guessing that, much like Casas, he is only being added so he can get some actual at-bats in...

If you want to keep it more regional, dump Pitt and add Philly...

But is that really fair? For example, in 2012, the Tigers won the AL Central with 88 wins. The Rays won 90 games that year (and in a clearly tougher division) and missed the postseason entirely! This also nearly happened in 2018, also to the Rays, who won 90 games and missed the postseason, while Cleveland won 91 games and was a division winner. We actually could have had a scenario where Tampa won 96 games and Cleveland won as few as 79 and Cleveland was the team that advanced to a full best of seven, while Tampa did not even get a one-game wild card opportunity...

Oh I do not like the 2 of 3 format. But those leagues do not give byes to the best record(s) either. I really do not even like the "division winner" thing. That means very good teams in tough divisions get eliminated while other teams advance solely because all the other teams in their geographic alignment just happen to suck even more...

Sure. There are 40 starting pitchers listed as available free agents on MLBTR. Now, some of them, notably Brett Anderson, Drew Smyly, Merrill Kelly, Jimmy Nelson, Corey Kluber, Tyson Ross, Rich Hill, and Michael Wacha I will say are less likely to throw 180 IP than Eovaldi. Others (Alex Wood, Garrett Richards, Mike Minor) are close. So that's 29 right there. (28 if you do not want to include Martin Perez, whose already here and likely to be back.) A few others have team options, but none of them look likely to be picked up. But then we could also see a wave of pitchers non-tendered. And another set of pitchers readily available in trade. The number could easily reach 40. As for "good", my premise is based on IP solely. Anything beyond that is debatable, but Eovaldi and his 86 ERA+ since 2018 does lower any bar you want to set...

We've all heard that before. However, in the case of Morton, reportedly he was surprised at how much money the Astros offered him when he heard "2 years at $8million." apparently he assumed it was $8mill total for the two years, not for each year. So he might be more than happy with his earnings and simply go home. I certainly would not blame him for not signing with a team in as much flux as the current Red Sox...