Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,388

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    Devers certainly can still have a bust out year that blows 2019 or 2021 away. He's only 27. I don't expect his defense to improve.
  2. moonslav59
    I'm thinking maybe one gets a Sept call-up- 2 at most. Instead, we'll see guys like Abreu and Rafaela playing FT (assume O'Neill traded.) We'll see McGuire traded and maybe Teel called up, but my guess is someone else gets a look-see- maybe even Hickey, who could DH some, if we squeeze Yoshida out. (Heineman?) I think Romy, Valdez and DHam might get longer looks, assuming they haven't already shown they suck by the deadline. Maybe Meidroth and or Sogard gets a look. No need to talk about great prospect pitchers knocking loudly on the door.
  3. moonslav59
    Exactly! Recent grads: 2023: Casas, Grissom, Bernardino, Valdez, Murphy, Kelly 2022: Bello, Duran, Crawford, Wink, Wong 2021: Houck & Whitlock Rafaela, Slaten, Abreu, DHam and others will graduate this year, most likely. Plus, Devers is younger than Houck, Crawford, Whitlock and Wong! We have a pretty solid base of young and controlled players on the 26, already. Lord knows, we still have holes- some very big, but add a few more from the big 3 and beyond, and that core should get even better.
  4. moonslav59
    I think this is one area for fans to think they have a better idea of when a prospect is "ready" or not. Then, there is the whole years of service during prime vs pre-prime aspect to the choice. I've always just trusted they team knows better than I do, on this. I'm sure they get things wrong, at times. On Teel, Anthony and Mayer, I don't think any are ML ready, now. I don't see any need to rush them and start their "clocks." Sure, I'd love to watch them, right now, and maybe they'd hit the ground running, if we called them up, soon, but I'd rather have them an extra year at ages 28-30 than at 21 to 24, and no, we can't just expect we can pay them through prime. We should know better, by now.
  5. moonslav59
    Indeed, but even Duran is improved and may be better in CF than the mix we had in 2023. Ref in LF is not much better than Yoshida.
  6. moonslav59
    I think there are more teams with serious flaws than we may think. I'm still holding onto a sliver of hope.
  7. moonslav59
    I doubt we see them, this year. September call-ups are limited, now. It is looking more and more like Yoshida was a complete failure, but he will be given a long leash in a punt season and at that pay. Maybe someday, we see... C: Teel & Wong 1B: Devers/Casas DH: Casas/Devers 2B: Grissom SS: Story 3B: Mayer LF: Duran CF: Rafaela RF: Anthony We still need pitching, but with all these pre-arb and arb contracts, even a stingy JH should allow us to build a winner. For 5 years, the question has been "How Soon Is Now?" When you say it's gonna happen now When exactly do you mean? See I've already waited too long And all my hope is gone
  8. moonslav59
    We can be pretty sure, they would not have spent his $313M elsewhere.
  9. moonslav59
    I think they did address the defense. Grissom should be better than Arroyo/Vadlez/Urias/Reyes/Kike. Rafaela is light years better than Duvall/Duran in CF. Duran is better than Yoshida in LF. We expected growth at 1B and C. Story was expected to vastly improve the SS D, and he did for 2 short weeks. RF and 3B looked like pushes. Some of us have suggested ways to improve 3B defense, but have been largely ridiculed for doing so. The lack of addressing the rotation was more neglectful, despite how the rotation has looked, so far. Now, with Story out, the defense cannot improve by nearly as much as planned/expected, but it still should move up from 28th to 30th in 2023 to around 20-24th. Not great, but still it may end up being the only area of improvement by October.
  10. moonslav59
    Our rotation, to date: 0.00 Houck 6 IP per start (2 GS) 0.57 Crawford 5.1 IP per start (3 GS) 0.82 Pivetta 5.2 IP per start (2 GS) 0.96 Whitlock 4.2 IP per GS (2 GS) 4.11 B Bello 5.1 IP per GS (3 GS) I doubt any other team has 5 SP'ers averaging 4.2 or more IP per start. I know no other team has ERAs like these. (1.42 rotation ERA) 63.1 IP in 12 GS (5.1 per start) 43 Hits 18 BB 71 Ks The sample size has grown to the point where we could have a game where our SP'er lets up 10 ERs in 5 IP
  11. moonslav59
    In 2023, we were 30th in OAA. In 2024, we are 21st, so far. Fangraphs has us 21st. (30th, last season) DRS has us 21st. (24th, last season) It's improved, but just not a whole lot. Kike, alone, killed the club's chances in April, last year. We had about 3-4 positions that were dead last.
  12. moonslav59
    1 strike per batter was better than what he did for us, at the end. LOL
  13. moonslav59
    I think they expected a .380 OBP and maybe 15 HRs/30 DBLs
  14. moonslav59
    Now, Kimbrell learns to throw strikes.
  15. moonslav59
    LOL. It is true that hardly any teams have several pitchers who go 6 almost every game. 6 x 33 starts is almost 200 IP.
  16. moonslav59
    We need to O to come back to life!
  17. moonslav59
    Welcome to MLB.
  18. moonslav59
    What is WONG with you!
  19. moonslav59
    Hickey hit his 3rd dinger for Woo. Making a case to get back in the mix. (DH?)
  20. moonslav59
    Just started warming up someone.
  21. moonslav59
    Just like that, the O's are back in it.
  22. moonslav59
    ...and it rubbed off on Duran.
  23. moonslav59
    Nice D Tyler!
  24. moonslav59
    Nice!
  25. moonslav59
    It's looking like 2023 was not a fluke.
×
×
  • Create New...