Agreed. We should and will not trade a top 6 prospect for a rental, and all the prospects below 6, except maybe pitchers, would not be taking a dent out of the longer term future. Sure, we could trade a mid level prospect and watch them do great, but we have a solid 11-12 everyday players returning for 2025 and 4-6 top prospects who should be ML ready by 2025, so we already look to have bottlenecks at certain positions.
Our OF is loaded and LHB centric:
2025 control or longer...
L Duran
L Abreu
R Rafaela (SS/2B)
R Refsnyder (2025 only)
L Anthony
R Campbell
R Lugo
R Yorke (2B) and maybe Valdez to LF
2026 or later: Bleis, Jh Garcia, Castro, Coffey, Taylor, Yuten, Asencio
SS/2B lacks in top quality, but excels in quantity of players/prospects with some promise:
Story
Rafaela (CF)
Mayer
Campblell (LF)
DHam
Grissom
Yorke
Valdez (LF?)
Romy (1B/OF)
Meidroth, Paulino, Westbrook, Sogard, Alvarez, McDonough
2026 or beyond: Cespedes, Zanetello, Arias, Romero, Anderson, Alcantara, Nunez, Ravelo
C/DH (C: Wong, McGuire '25 only & Teel)
Jo Garcia, Hickey, Brannon, Gasper (1B)
DH: Valdez, Lugo, Kavadas (1B,) Yorke, Jordan, Encarnacion & J Gonzalez (1B)
The only 2 positions we do not have extensive depth happen to be the two positions with top 3 quality players:
3B: Devers
1B: Casas
Our pitching depth is thin in the minors, but we have thought that for over 6 years, and we currently have a very nice staff of many homegrown pitchers + pitchers acquired as prospects or recent grads.
While it would be great to have a 5 deep OF core on the 26 (Duran, Anthony, Rafaela, Abreu & Campbell,) when you have high need areas, like pitching, it makes sense to trade one.
Our middle IF is not top heavy, like the OF is, but we can afford to trade depth for a rental.