moonslav59

But only at 2B and only vs RHPs and only for half a season and only for...

I do wonder about Springer repeating. I also wonder about Grisham, too.

It's not like I came up with the notion for the first time in history.

Counting on Houck to be ready in April 2027 might be too much to ask.

AL Projected Team fWAR 47.9 TOR 47.5 NYY 46.8 SEA 46.2 BOS (-1.7 from TOR/ -1.3 from NYY/ -0.6 from SEA) 45.3 BAL 44.3 DET 42.3 HOU

No wonder they make dumb trades like this.

I almost wrote this, yesterday.

The O's have finally made some serious moves, but they started so far behind us, I'm not sure how close we can rate them. We won 14 more games than they did in 2025 and 22 more by the Pythagorean numbers. IMO, we got better, so in theory, they have to make up more than 14-22 games. I know I let my hatred towards the Yanks cloud my judgement, and I've been predicting their decline, mostly due to age factors, having a dumb manager and GM, and quite frankly spending on worse players than we have in recent years. I thought losing Soto was going to kill them, but they got a career year from Grisham and some ole fogies did better than I thought. I'm going to run my mantra again, this winter: I think the Yanks get worse in 2026. BTW, we were in second place on September 10, 2025. It's not a great leap to think we will pass them. TOR way outperformed their Pythagorean numbers (by 6 wins.) I'm not sure how much that matters, but it's a straw I grasped. I don't think losing Bichette & Bassitt and adding a questionable Cease & Oko is going to make up for that loss. Ponce could be a big help- or not. I think 1st and 2nd place are well within our reach, and not so much because we made any great gains, but because the other teams failed to improve or even got worse. I also look at our key players positions on the prime bell curve and think we have a better chance of seeing improvement that they do.

I'm actually shocked at how little we gave up for Durbin. Had it only been Durbin, without the 2 other depth players and the comp pick, which should not be undervalued, even if just for the added bonus money, it would still look great, to me. MIL must really like Harrison. It better not be DHam they like.

Don't link those onions to idiocy. They are pure genius.

Sorry. I have to fight back laughter on this. I'm done counting on hopes of pitchers returning from the IL on schedule or earlier.

On not addressing the power need and "not improving" on power from the 2025 season: the guy who jumps to mind the most is Devers, and rightly so, but he was only here for a couple months. The Sox w Devers: .169 ISO/ .422 SLG The Sox after Devers: .166 ISO/ .421 SLG Not much difference, so one could argue we can compare the post Devers Sox to the 2026 Sox, but I'll include Devers in the list of departed batters: Note that none of our best power hitters were top 3 in PAs and only Bregman was top 7. (Only Breggie & Raffy were top 11 in PAs) .232/.504 Devers (334 PaS) .214/.482 Refsnyder (209 PAs) .189/.462 Bregman (495 PAs) .140/.420 N Lowe (119) .131/.256 Toro (284) 10th in PAs Adds: .190/.447 Contreras (563) is close to Bregman (may see numbers rise in Fenway) .130/.387 Durbin (506) improves on Toro's power numbers a bit but not Lowe's. We really need 600+ PAs from... .171/.468 Anthony (303) at similar numbers as these- maybe with some more pop. It's not an unreasonable ask. It is safe to say we did not improve on HR power from 2025, and instead we'll need improved pop from returning players and maybe from Contreras & Durbin playing half their games at Fenway.

Very true. It's always hard to measure when you improve in 1-2 area but get worse in 1-2 other areas.

"Elite" is a relative term. Preventing HRs is just as important as hitting them.

Did you miss the comment about joking? Nobody wants Masa. He'd be gone, if just one team halfway wanted him or just mentioned his name in a conversation with Brez.

Durbin turns 26, soon. While the age of prime varies from player to player, and many players don't get any better after 25 or 26, the ones who stick around into their 30's more often than not get better. After 3 seasons in college at over a 1.000 ops, Caleb hovered in the mid .700s, until he reached AAA in 2024. Over two seasons in AAA, he hit .858 with about 18 HRs per 650 (45 2B+3B & 45 SBs) Maybe this is his ceiling? It's hard to know. .285 w 20 HRs and 30 SBs is pretty good. He won't K much, so that will make some posters happy. He seems pretty good on D, too, and it remains to be seen where they place him and Mayer. He wasn't the big bat many of us had hoped for, so I do still feel a sense of a letdown. AI felt a little bit the same way with Contreras and not Alonso. The two mini let downs combine into a sense of being a bigger letdown. I totally get the doom & gloomers. We coulda-shoulda and didn't. We did make up for at least some of that let down by power boosting the rotation beyond anyone's expectations. We traded away and swapped out some of the rotation depth, but we still remain about 4 SP'ers deep and at a level of quality very few, if any, teams can match. We may need to steal one or two of those arms for the pen, but maybe we add a piece there before opening day. I'm feeling cautiously optimistic about 2026. We have a lot of upside players that are pre or near prime. We don't need them all to step up, but I do not think it is unreasonable to expect more players to step up than to regress or stay the same. Most of our key players are in prime years or before. A few are on the downside of prime, but still able to produce. Only Chapman and Gray are past the normal ages of prime.

It would have taken a miracle. Planning for a miracle is foolish.

It was meant as at least half a joke.

Bassitt to O's for $18.5M/1.

This was about Masa being the LH'd OF'er they seek. It's not happening.

When you look at the Sox ring seasons this century, you can see a very strong correlation between many GS'd by our top SP'ers and WS victories. Even when you look at the near miss seasons, they were highlighted by upticks in pitching.

Let's assume Kelly, Romy & Casas begin the year on the IL or in AAA, our 26 man roster would have 10 players who did not play a single game for the Sox in 2025: Suarez, Gray, Oviedo, Crawford, Sandoval, Watson (+Moran w 4 IP) Contreras, Durbin, Kiner-Falefa & Monasterio The AAA roster has at least 17 players new to the system: Sikkema, Gamboa, Samaniego, Berrios, Sweet, Martinez, T Guerrero, Nittoli, K Keller Gasper, Thaiss, Rodgers, Cheng, Ward, Lloyd, Seigler, Capra, Frazier

Final 2025 fWAR fWAR Team (Everyday/Pitching)>>> 2026 Projected 50.6 NYY (34.3/16.3)>>> 47.5 (-3.1 seems about right) 44.3 TOR (32.6/11.7)>>>47.9 (+3.6- I don't see it) 43.6 BOS (25.2/18.4)>>>46.2 (+2.6 I think we did better than TOR) 31.0 TBR (15.7/15.3)>>>38.6 (+7.6 Huh????) 24.1 BAL (14.1/10.0) >>>45.3 (+21.2 Whoa, Nellie!!!)

My case is pitchers deserve MVP awards often. The best often face more batters than any batter has ever faced a pitcher in a season. The argument that they only play every 5 games doesn't hold water, to me. No batter ever gets 20-30 PAs a game, either. The Sox 3 best pitchers were more important than our 3 best bats and maybe even our 4 or 5 or even 6 best bats. I don't think we need a single player to have a career year on offense, although with players at their ages, it should happen. Duran can play somewhere between the '24 and '25 seasons and be a huge help. Story had a decent year in '25 but far from his career best. Just a repeat of '25 would be great. Contreras should be helped by Fenway and do better than '25, but need not have a career high (.888 or even over .840 like he did 5 times, already- just hit .800 to .825ish, maybe?) Narvaez, Rafaela, Romy, Durbin and others- just repeat 2025. I do expect a better 2026 from Abreu and maybe Anthony to just do the same as 2025 but with double the PAs, but neither needs to bust out. Mayer set a pretty low bar in 2025. Of course, expecting everyone to do the same of better is probably a longer shot that expecting 3-4 to have career years, but we don't need a miracle.

We kinda fell apart last year, at the end. Gio, Bello and the bats. That's not to say we were better than our record indicated but the Pythagorean numbers said we were (or should have been) better. I think TOR and NYY stayed about the same and we improved to an unspecific degree. The Yanks are a much older team. TOR lost some key players and added question marks to replace them. BAL improved, but they started behind us. SP: much better Pen: about the same Defense: much better Offense: worse- maye much worse These are not 4 equal parts, so it's hard to decide on how much better we will be, but on paper, I think 2-4 wins more. (We were 5 wins away from TOR and NYY in 2025.) BTW, Pyth had NYY at 97 and TOR at 88, last year.