Try reading my words. I said "top 3 out of the 6-8 contenders."
According to fangraphs, we are:
3rd in all AL in fWAR for everyday players. Funny how you use fWAR for pitch9ing but wRC+ for everyday players. We are also 3rd in AL OPs, and yes, tied for 4th in wRC+. (Ooooo, missed by 1 slot.)
5th in fWAR pitching, but behind 3 teams that are NOT CONTENDERS! We are 3rd in the AL in ERA- (a valid metric, and we'd be 1st, if you dont count TEX & KCR as contenders) 4th in SP ERA-, but 2nd if no TEX & KCR. 1st in RP ERA- in all of AL.
Yes, T2nd in fWAR oen, but once again, MIN is NOT a contender. I said among contenders.
Yes, 8th in SP fWAR in AL, but 6th among contenders.
Again, among the contenders we are top 3 in everyday players, rotation and pen. We are about avg on D, Why not call me out on this one? We are T2nd in AL DRS (your fave D metric)- behind the team you suggested was about to "get hot," Texas. I was wrong there, but on the low side.
Of course, on could argue TEX and KCR are still contenders, and that has merit, but I did write, "the top 6-8 contenders," which leaves out 1-2 teams from CLE, TEX & KC.
For the king nitpicker, you miss a lot.