moonslav59

Since we have no immediate roster crunch, since we have 2 guys we can easily move to the 60 IL, there is no hurry. He does provide DH depth, but the way I see it, if we lose Devers for the season and need Yoshi, we are toast, anyway. The million dollar question is why is Yoshi not DH'ing on some minor league team? Has Brez been asked this? It's not like "working on building up arm strength" is a 24/7 process. If he was hitting .900 in AAA, maybe his value increases. It's already as low as can be, so what's to lose? (That's the $1 question.)

Big win. Maybe the ejections will be the spark... LOL (I'm reaching- I know.)

He had a decent OBP in the minors and a little power, but the word was he was glove-only. It looks like Wong is the #2 for sure.

Jh Garcia hit a dinger in AAA. Anthony also homered, tonight. Van Belle has his ERA under 3.00 with his 6 IP, zero runs and just 3 Hits/ 0BB. Monegro went 5 and K's 10! (3 Hits, 0 ER, 1BB) Salem was down 5-0, but are now tied 6-6.

It does. IMO, he played too long. His rough start, hurt too. I'd call him close to even, over his career, when you factor in O + D. fangraphs has him at +13.5, and I can see the thinking that it's too high. His total PAs equals about 7 full years, so his fWAR is about 2 per full season. bWAR is too high, IMO (16.6) which comes to about 2.3/full year. I loved watching him play D, and he had a 5 year stretch, where he hit well for about 2 seasons and okay for 3.

I'm not saying the extra errors were cause by getting to extremely difficult balls. Many of these great-ranged SSs make errors on the balls hit to them, and yes, the score keeper rarely gives an error on a difficult play, unless he throws it away and the defender takes an extra base. Maybe a select few are called on some mildly difficult ones that the statue never even touches. Why you assume defense is only about making no mistakes, even if you are a statue baffles my mind. You don't answer the points made and offer no evidence or data to support your claim, You just repeat defining what Fldg % is, like we don't know, and that it is all there is to defense. You are wrong on so many levels, it's no longer worth the debate.

Are any teams desperate for a DH only player? Even if there are one or two, how much would Yoshida get on the open FA Market? $3.3M x 3? $4.5M x 3? If we could get $10-15M in salary relief, let's just cut ties. There is no hurry, as we still have 1-2 players we could move to the 60 day IL, but eventually, it will need to be done.

I'd call him a great fielder, if he made more plays due to his freakishly long arms. Yes, the metrics would capture the fact that he made plays nobody else could or does make. This is an example of it not only being about athleticism. Some tall 1Bmen make plays shorter ones do not.

I have mentioned parks, teams with staffs that K more than others or allow GB outs vs FO with significant differences. I mentioned how RF/9 had serious flaws. I only brought it up to show that some players do make 100-150 more plays than others, and yes, some SSs make 800 plays a year. Modern technology has allowed us to factor in onl the plays hit within the range of a position player, how hard it was hit, and how far away the defender was. If Player A gets 200 less chances, it factors that in. There have been some notecase flaws in the system, like fenway's short LF wall, and how some parks have very big areas that allow players to make more plays. Nobody says the system is perfect, but the SS position is a bit difference. The area of plays that can be made is near identical everywhere. The numbers of playable balls hit varies, for sure, but that is part of the equation, as is how hard the play is to make. You can choose to not trust the data or the results, but you dismiss it all out of hand, without even knowing what it is.

Player A - 90 outs and 10 errors Player B - 80 outs 20 hits and 0 errors Is the team better off with Player A. Yes. Is player A a better fielder NO. You outdid yourself with an even more absurd belief. Why is your definition of fielding only about just errors and no errors? Surely, there is more to it.

This has to be one of the most absurd statements and beliefs I've ever seen posted by someone who does not appear to be a troll.

Nobody disputes there are difference, and I even mentioned the flaws with the traditional range factor data. The data is NOT BASED ON ESTIMATES or PREDICTIONS! The data is based on scientifically evaluating each play that was actually hit towards a player and determining which players make the same plays and which ones do not. There is no guessing or subjectivity, like Fldg% has. Are the inaccuracies? Sure, same as Fldg%, but the data is useful when used with other data and yes, even Fldg%, combined.

Nobody claims it's 100% accurate, and neither is Fldg %. Both have value but are not perfect. So,m you have not seen the formula, but dismiss it out of hand. Their system has been explained. Just watch some games that show the data on some fielding plays (usually greta ones) and you can see the data is there. They expect fans to think it's fairly accurate and usually the eye test can back up the data that shows player A has way more range than player B.

Do you even bother to look? (Neifi Perez 812 plays in 2000. While 800 plays is rare, it does happen, but that is beyond the point. How about 600 to 500? You neglect to respond to the actual point.

His D was always good. His bat was... .548 in first 164 games ('13-'14) count as one season .832 (1/2 season) .835 .727 for 3 seasons ('17-'19) .814 (1/2 season in '20) .513 over last 308 games (3 seasons counted as 2) Essentially: 2 seasons over .800 w GG type D 3 seasons around .725 w GG type D 3 seasons below .550 w GG type D 5 out of 8 seasons doing well or very well. 3 were horrific offensive displays w GG type D.

You totally miss the point. Making .980 of 800 plays is better than making .990 of 700 plays, if the 100 extra plays were made due to better range skills. That is just a fact. I give up. You can't see the broad side of a bright red barn.

Right now, no. It's a long season.

Before the season is over, we may see 11 SP'ers, all who have shown some sort of promise or past history of having some skills. Crochet, Buehler, Houck (not lately) Bello, Crawford, Giolito (not lately) Fitts, Dobbins, Newcomb Criswell and Sandoval (Not even mentioning Whitlock and Wink.) We just need 4-5 be good to very good.

I've seen a lot on sites like this, and some are just plain trolls, but I gotta say, I'm verklempt.

Wow, we only K'd 5 times! Dobbins looked good. I think he deserved the win over Wilson, but let's not open the can of worms over pitcher win stats. Good to see Duran hitting the ball hard and looking focused. Beating good teams is what we have to do over the next few weeks and months.

IMO, both have been ML ready before this year even started, except maybe Mayer needing to get in sinc, after missing the end of 2024. This does not mean they are entitled to call-ups, but I do think both are ready, bumps and grinds expected and all. When will the time be better? Do we have to wait for a major injury at the position they play or one that would demand very little shuffling? I get that Story is being paid a lot, Rafaela is an amazing defender who may be finding a groove, and Campbell has already been called up and shown flashed of what could be, but there is no reason we should keep playing Sogard/Toro and others at 1B, once Campbell is deemed capable enough to play there. Mayer is almost surely than Sogard/Toro/Wong and Romy (vs RHPs.) Calling up Anthony is more problematic, and we don't want to move Rafaela to middle infield to make way for him. The Abreu-Refsnyder platoon is about as good as you can get for one OF slot. While Duran has sucked against LHPs, Anthony bats lH'd, too, and we won't and should NOT call him up to be even a strong side platoon, let alone the short-side one. Duran is heating up, and get the worry about his defense in CF. The OF call is difficult to make, but unless we make a trade, what is going to change in the next 2-3 years? How long does he wait? How long do we wait?

Farm OPS (120+ PAs) .950 Anthony AAA .931 Ehrhard A+ .866 Encarnacion A- .821 Romero AA .818 Anderson A-/A+ .817 Taylor A+ .814 Jordan AA .811 Eaton AAA .803 Arias A-/A+ .794 Mayer AAA .792 Hickey AAA .748 Jh Garcia AA (to AAA) OPS Against (22+ IP) .486 McShane A-/A+ .499 Rogers A+/AA .519 Mullins A+/AA .521 Aita A- .571 Drohan AAA .579 Cohen A- & Criswell AAA .591 Stock AAA .640 Uberstine AA/AAA (Brandon Clarke is at .321 in 19.2 IP!)

I've been pretty high on him, for a while, but let's see how he handles AAA. Woo certainly had room for him, even with Anthony staying put for a while longer.

Do we care that the guy successfully fielding balls closer to him receives a higher rating in the form of a higher fielding percentage than another player gets more challenging plays? All defenders get challenging plays- mayb e not the same amount, but over time, it's probably pretty close. Some don't even come close to making the play, and a casual observers might think, no error, no problem: the play was unmakeable. Some come close to making the play- maybe the dive and stop it, but can't get up to make the throw- no error, no problem, all is good. A few can get to the ball and either make an out, don't make an out with no error, or get charged with an error, because the bobble the ball or throw it away. If those select few players get to 80 more balls a year than most other players, how is that not a big value, even if they make 20 errors, get 6o more outs and 20 go for non error hits, because the scorer judged the play too difficult to make even after the player got to it, but could have got an out if he played it perfectly and threw a gem at 90 mph?

It's not simulation. It measures all plays made- the ones hit right at someone, near them, or nearly impossible to get to, but some do. Why would you think that player A is as good as player B, if they both make the identical plays hit at them or near them: same amount- same error rate, but player B gets to and touches 100 more balls over a season that are just plain out of the range of player A. He makes 80 of them and is charged with an error (glove or throw) on 20. You still think play A is better? While this is a hypothetical scenario I am presenting to you, these situations are based in reality and can be proven by facts, This happens every year in MLB. Simple observations can tell you some SSs get to balls hit very far away from them, or ones kinds far but hit sharply, while some just don't seem to make any or many more than 4. 5 or maybe 6-7 steps away, if the ball is hit slower. Of course some players make plays others never dreamed they could make. How is that not a distinct value (or weakness, if you lack range?) Sure, some speculation is involved, but when you figure errors are assigned or not based on subjectivity, then we also "speculate" it all evens out over time. Nothing is perfect- not fldg% or metrics. Fldg% is just one part of defense. Thinking range and athleticism, such as being able to jump higher, run faster, or react quicker is not helpful or of value blows my mind away. Thinking that some players position themselves better, read the pitch better, get better jumps and take the right angle to the ball better is not speculation or simulation: it is fact and it is observable with the naked eye and also with cameras and high tech data like ball speed, distance from defender, trajectory and more.