Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    136

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. You are correct, but we still spent a lot. Our 2012 budget broke our previous record by over $7M and was $12M more than 2011. Yes, we dipped into the mid $250's in 2013 and 2014, but even those numbers dwarfed 2007 ($143M) and 2004 ($127M). Amazingly, we were at $99.9M in 2003. 2015 broke the 2012 record by $9M when we spent $184.3M. That's almost double our 2003 budget and $40M higher than 2007 and $57M more than 2004. Yes, salaries inflated those years, but not by that much. This does not refute your claim, however. We did spend more but not on "elite," big-priced free agents, but rather several mid-ranged ones. One coudl argue we bombed out on most of those, too. Even the Victorino and Napoli deal only looked good for 1 year. A look back at the signings those years: before 2012: Cody Ross, Aaron Cook (Traded for Melancon, Bailey & Mortenson) before 2013: Kojo Uehara, S Victorino, Mike Napoli & Jonny Gomes (Cash for M Carp) before 2014: Pierzynski, Mujica, Napoli (again) & Sizemore before 2015: Pablo & HRam (not elite- but close to elite contracts) Traded Cespedes for Porcello and signed Masterson, too.
  2. We're 1 behind Texas for the last WC slot, right now. We're 5.5 behind TB. We're 6 behind the Yanks (5.5, if the Yanks lose).
  3. The only starter to not get on base two or more times, tonight, is Beni, and he has 2 RBIs.
  4. Two trends crossing in the night!
  5. The earlier pitch was outside, too.
  6. Robo UMPS, YESTERDAY already!!!
  7. Yes, and his cold streaks are always longer than his hot ones. Many of his hot streaks are white hot, so the final numbers look decent to good year after year. His career started very slowly. Here's a look at some selected time frames: .548 over his first 530 PAs (2013-2014) 2015: .384 over his first 59 PAs (May to Aug) .962 over his last 196 PAs 2016: .586 over his first 59 PAs 1.082 middle 228 PAs .669 over last 249 PAs 2017: .637 over the first 112 PAs 1.014 over his middle 164 PAs .589 over his last 265 PAs 2018: .502 over his first 142 PAs (to May 20th) .793 over the last 393 PAs plus the nutty playoffs. 2019: .421 over his first 145 PAs (to May 20th) 1.056 over his most recent 87 PAs (JBJ's longest hot streak 8/6/15-10/2/16 was 832 PAs long at an .865 OPS.) In a way his career has been like some seasons: .548 the first 2 years (months) and .772 the last 4 years (months). Actually, here are the Sox OPS from 8/6/15 to 7/4-17( almost 2 full seasons): 1.050 Papi .895 Betts .864 JBJ .829 Beni .826 HRam .819 Moreland .814 Pedey .809 Bogey .805 Young
  8. Yes, and although his last 2 years of the deal were spent in LA, we had Jay Bay in his place via the trade. (BTW, we got Workman as comp for losing JBay.)
  9. Exactly. The list of failures is about as long as the successes: Offerman, Lugo, Dice-K, the Penny/Smoltz combo, Crawford, Masterson, the 2nd Napoli signing, Pablo, HRam. Some might say JD Drew, Dempster, Jenks ($6M), and some even called the Price signing a disaster.
  10. You are right, but with so many other players starting off slow, it was hard to blame JBJ. Many players slump almost every year- not like JBJ, for the most part-- but when you slump to start the season, that OPS jumps out at you every time you look at the stats. If a player started out at 1.000 after 6 weeks and decline to .659, he wouldn't be getting as much attention as the guy who started out in the .300s and .400s before rising to .669. Personally, I'd rather have a plyer that gets hot at the end of the year, and JBJ's heroics in last year's playoffs were memorable, than someone who fizzles out at season's end. I've been a big JBJ defender, no doubt, but his start was putrid. It certainly cost us more than one game. It is not my intention to sugar coat his slumps or get us to forget them: they are horrible, too long and too often. He's my favorite Sox player, but I would not be crushed, if the traded him this coming winter.
  11. It's been hit and miss. No rings without Manny, Papi, Victorino, Napoli, Foulke, Damon, Price or JD
  12. JBJ is now over .650 after being under .450 in mud May. This shows how just a small sample size can change everything. It also shows how small the sample size was by May 20th. Nobody will argue that .450 is acceptable or that 6 weeks is not a long slump, but JBJ is helping us now- in many ways.
  13. What an exhausting game to watch. We let up 9 hits, 9 walks and 3 HBPs, but we somehow held on. A win is a win, but it's hard to get too pumped up after this one.
  14. Casas and Duran are ranked highly.
  15. Weber got shelled in AAA 1.1 IP 6 ER (6H & 2 BB) Wright: 3 IP 0 ER (2H & 0 BB) Thornburg 1.2 IP 1 ER (0H & 3 BB) De la Guerra with a grand slam (5th HR) Gorkys Hernandez 2 for 4 & a BB Rusney 4 for 4 with a 2B ________________________ In AA Houck 6 IP 1 ER (6H & 0 BB and 6Ks) Duran 1 for 3 with a BB Dalbec 0-2 with an rbi _____________________ A Shugart 5.2 IP 0 ER (4H & 0 BB and 6 Ks) 1.64 ERA Tendler 5h tater
  16. Maybe Shawaryn can surprise us. Feltman has been disappointing. It would be an immense boost if one from Chatham, Chavis, Dalbec or Ockimey do better than just "decent" next year.
  17. Would you take JBJ, Duran, DHern, Houk and Chatham for Santana, EE + Cash? What if Casas was subbed for one of the prospects above?
  18. We'd still have a good team without JD and Porcello, but probably not "highly" competitive, unless Bogey, Devers, Betts and Beni all equal their best seasons all at once, AND some of our farm hands step up and play decent ball... not great but just decent. Oh, and everyone stay healthy... LOL!
  19. The Rays & Guardians lost, as of course did the Rangers. One more big game vs Texas, then we play 3 at BAL and 3 at MN. After a much needed day off, we come back home for 3 v TOR and 3 v CWS . Then 2 days off as we go to London fo 2 v NYY.
  20. It was a nice run by the Bruins. They played tough all playoffs, except maybe this game. Get 'em next year!
  21. Agreed, but if the rest of the players play like 2018 with maybe Devers, Vaz and Bogey playing a little more like 2019, we should still be pretty, highly competitive. Here's a look at a possible 2020 roster (assuming JD stays and Porcello, Moreland, Pearce, Nunez, and Thorburg bolt via free agency): Luxury Tax Dollars SP (~$83M) 25.6 Sale 31.0 Price 17.0 Eovaldi ~8.0 ERod (3rd arb out of 4) 0.6 B Johnson 0.6 Velazquez RP (~$12.6M) ~4.5 Barnes (2nd or 3 arbs) ~2.5 Workman (3 of 3 arbs) 0.6 Walden ~2.5 Hembree (2nd or 3 arbs) ~0.6 ________ (JBJ traded for cheap but solid RP'er) 0.6 Brasier ~1.0 Wright (3 of 3 arbs) C (~$4.5M) 4.5 Vaz 0.6 Centeno or Leon (possible massive pay cut?) 1B (~$1.2M) 0.6 Chavis 0.6 Dalbec or Ockimey (Chavis) 2B (~$19.3) ~4.0 Holt 0.6 Chatham ~0.9 Marco Hernandez 13.8 Pedroia 3B (~0.6M) 0.6 Devers (last pre-arb year) (Dalbec) SS $22 Bogey LF (~$6M) ~6.0 Beni(1st of 3 arbs) CF (~$0.6M) 0.6 G Hernandez RF (~$27M) ~27.0 Betts DH ($22M) 22.0 Martinez $203M Total ~$15M Player benefits ~$2M 15 pre-arb players on 40 man roster (minors) $220M Total $208M is the luxury tax for 2020. We could stay under by more by saying good bye to JD, getting Pedey to retire or trading salary. (I was wrong about being able to reset by just trading JBJ, in an earlier post.)
  22. The 'Stros are stingy with their prospects, but I'm sure they'd rather have EE than MM. Remember, they get BRIAN Freakin' JOHNSON, too! (LOL)
×
×
  • Create New...