Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    134

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Right now, we don’t have to pass anyone, we head into a somewhat easy portion of our schedule and we are set to get a few key pieces back from injuries. Let’s see where we are in a couple weeks.
  2. mostly, yes, but Snell was not expensive, but they somehow knew it was the exact right time to move him.
  3. A lot of their best young players are acquired by trade not by draft.
  4. Hey, our best RPers get a long rest, this way.
  5. They even traded last years best pitcher, too!
  6. Yes, when he leaves baseball to be a bilingual teacher.
  7. The Rays are so tough. They are no fluke. To those who thought last year’s short season success was not sustainable, think again.
  8. 28 hits and walks, yesterday. 4 today. Reminds me of the pre-Theo Sox.
  9. Marwin's Theory of De-Evolution: Survival of the manager's favorites.
  10. I would start anyone over over Marwin, with consideration even given to pitchers. That's how little faith I have in his bat.
  11. I'm talking about you judging players based on 20 games, not when a team can't or can extend the leash. That is an interesting issue to discuss, and we have had some of those talsk about Dalbec, Cordero and others.
  12. Um, we were in a pennant race when Pedey (2006- 1 GB on AUG 13) and the start of 2007 and JBJ (2013) were brought up.
  13. Maybe Vaz just needed a rest, and Cora goes back to him hard, despite Plawecki's recent success.
  14. Nobody can ever convince me to start Marwin, even in a triple header.
  15. This is not the correct way to use CERA, either, but for those who think overall CERA tells a better story, consider these numbers over multiple seasons. 2014-2021 Red Sox pitchers with Vaz and back ups sorted by most IP with Sox since 2014 (all Sox pitchers with 280+ IP since 2014 w Sox): CERA/OPS Against (IP) Sale 2.51/.622 AJ P (226) 2.79/.578 Leon (436) 4.61/.762 Vaz (84) (No catcher on the CWS had a CERA worse than 3.53) ERod 3.78/.778 Hanigan (50) 4.05/.700 Leon (118) 4.23/.723 Vaz (566) 4.44/.692 Swihart (75) Porcello 4.19/.728 Leon (576) 4.93/.800 Swihart (122) 4.96/.794 Vaz (211) 5.38/.831 Holaday (55) (Nobody on Detroit with over 30 IP w Porcello had a worse CERA than 4.43) Price 2.96/.647 Leon (204) 4.27/.738 Vaz (360) (All other catchers with 30+ IP with Price had a CERA better than Vaz's. One guy, Gregg Zaun with only 43 IP had one close at 4.19. Everyone with more than 100 IP had a CERA or 3.61 or better.) Eovaldi 2.66/.419 Wong (20) 3.54/.657 Plawecki (69) 4.30/.765 Vaz (147) 4.53/.735 Leon (44) 4.85/.421 Salty (124) Buccholz 2.83/.642 VMart (241) 3.01/.646 Leon (155) 3.79/.629 Lava (36) 3.95/.737 Salty (207) 4.44/.705 Vaz (130) 4.68/.683 D Ross (73) 5.12/.801 VTek (118) 5.63/.836 AJ P (62) Others: Alex Avila 1.55/.587 in 52 IP Barnes 3.69/.624 Vaz (197) 3.83/.697 Leon (99) 4.50/.803 Swihart (42) Pomeranz 3.32/.721 Holaday (41) 3.92/.745 Vaz (198) 6.02/.934 Leon (46) Kelly (Y Molina 2.81/.721 in 176 IP) 3.23/.619 Vaz (98) 3.94/.580 D Ross (32) 4.48/.698 Swihart (74) 4.63/.785 Leon (56) 4.83/.761 Hanigan (91) Wright 2.94/.611 Hanigan (95) 3.49/.700 Vaz (101) 4.06/.716 Swihart (71) 5.83/.935 Leon (59) Some sample sizes are rather small with some catchers and some are highly unbalanced. Some are during different parts of a pitcher's career, but the numbers astound me every time I look them up. The totals: 10 top pitchers by IP Leading in CERA: 2 Leon 2 Han 2 Vaz (Barnes & Joe Kelly- not the biggest sample size pitchers) 1 by AJP, Holaday, VMart, Plawecki OPS Against: 4 Leon 1 Hanigan, Holaday Lava, Salty, Ross & Vaz Last place with 100+ IP by 2+ pitchers: CERA 5 Vaz 1 VTEk (w Buch) 1 Leon (w Barnes) OPS 4 Vaz 1 Swihart (Porcello) 1 VTek (Buch) 1 Leon (Barnes) Out of the 9 pitchers who had 80+ IP with 2 or more catchers, Vaz finished last or second to last in 7 out of the 9 cases in CERA and 6 of 9 in OPS Against. Only Buch and Barnes were in Vaz's favor.
  16. Here's another case that may support my claims on catchers getting the most out of pitchers: Josh Beckett, 2009: VTek was his personal caddy all year. 3.17 CERA w VTek (185 IP) 7.16 CERA w VMart (16 IP) 10.32 CERA w Kottaras (11 IP) Yes, unbalanced and small sample sizes, so what does Tito do? He starts VMart with Beckett in the playoffs to "improve the offense," and this happenes: You want small sample sizes? 6.2 IP 4 ER and a loss and early exit for the Sox that playoff season.
  17. At least he's respectable vs LHPs (.754), but no- not ideal. Over his career, he's been pretty evenly bad.
  18. I'm arguing about judging players over such tiny sample sizes. 20 games is tiny. The fact that Pedey had an off season to work things out and it still took him way longer than Duran has had helps my case not yours. Pedey's sample size was... Year 1 31 games: .561 OPS in 98 PAs Year 2 (2007) First 21 games: .518 OPS in 68 PAs Duran: 20 games: .580 OPS in 69 PAs. Again, I'm glad nobody made definitive judgments on Pedey after his first176 PAs and 52 games, which was a worse OPS than Duran. JBJ had a bigger sample size than Duran, too, even just year 1. .617 OPS in 107 PAs (37 games) Year 2 .531 in 423 PAs (127 games) Year 3 .426 in first 71 PAs (24 games) Wow! What patience Theo & Tito showed this guy!
  19. There is a ton of anecdotal evidence that points to many pitchers preferring one catcher over another.
  20. OMG! Marwin starts again. Bloom has to remove Cora's binky.
  21. We paid $2.8M towards Beni and did not pay the $6.6M he was owed in 2021 or the full $5M towards the tax line did not count against us. Henry saved $3.8M by trading him, and we saved about $2.2M on the tax line, which would have put us over, this year and set the clock to year 2 in 2022 and year 3 in 2023, assuming we go over those years, too.
×
×
  • Create New...