I'm not saying the reports were true.
I'm just saying there were some reports the Sox were at the top of the list over 2 weeks ago.
This is not "new" news, and the news has since changed to reflect we are not the front-runners (and maybe never were.)
It was reported weeks ago, the Sox were the the "leaders" in signing him.
Jan 7
https://fansided.com/2022/01/07/seiya-suzuki-red-sox-rumors-koji-uehara/
Jan 8
https://noooracademy.com/seiya-suzuki-hints-that-the-red-sox-are-the-first-to-sign-him/
Dec 6
https://bosoxinjection.com/2021/12/06/red-sox-pitcher-excited-free-agent-seiya-suzuki/
Rasing to $1M sounds about right, to me, but that's about $430K more to maybe 15 players on most teams, unless you mean to everyone on the 40 man, then it might be 20-30 players for most teams, or about $9-$14M additional salary cost to most teams.
Does it make a difference if the average fan does not relate to the negotiations of the wants of each side?
They just want to see baseball. Who they blame, if there is no baseball, might not matter much either.
This issue and solution seems like the most obvious fix and not extremely costly solution.
If the majority of players make min wage or are pre-arb, it seems easy to just please them and get a majority vote from the player.
Raising their salaries by a lot would all but ensure their votes and would not really affect the bottom line all that much, except for maybe the very stingiest teams, who pay almost all their roster min or near min wage.
There are more issues that need to be settled, but tis seems like an easy give by the owners.
The financial cost of JBJ vs Renfroe- not that we had to keep Renfroe, even if we did not acquire JBJ, make the fact that he may be a 4th OF'er a bit strange, UNLESS Bloom really likes the prospects and/or thought Renfroe was way over-valued.