Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,023
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    132

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. True, but there may be so many better choices out there than an injured Ward.
  2. What are they going to say? I do think they felt they could be competitive enough to compete for a playoff slot- just not a top ring contender, until maybe mid season, when they starting thinking, "Holy s***!" I think, not going over the tax line in 2021 was a sign they did not think it was "the year." It wasn't even close to the tax level on opening day. Just my opinion.
  3. If his medicals are highly questionable, I doubt anyone takes Ward. I don't think Wikelman is that far from being ML ready, especially on a 60 win team. I think he will be selected. Paulino may be too far away and might not even get to play on a 60 win team, but some team might choose to stunt his growth by parking him on the ML bench for a year, in hopes of hitting the jackpot years from now. There may be several players ranked ahead of Paulino from other teams, so maybe he is safe. Wallace could probably pitch in the bigs, next season. He may be selected. It's kind of a badge of honor for Bloom to have that much farm depth that we are talking 2-3 players who may be selected by other teams. I could also be a badge of disgrace, if one gets selected, does very well, while we hung onto Ort, DHern, Chang and Cordero. The equation goes deeper than that, however, as those 3 may be gone to make room for FA signings, so it might really have come down to Wikelman, Wallace and Ward vs R Hernandez, Hosmer, Downs or Duran. Those choices are tougher.
  4. Not sure. I'd like to hear, if he was strongly on their radar from day one, or not. I was kind of surprised we had not spent up to the tax line as we neared the end of the major player signing period, so maybe he was always going to be signed, and they were waiting out other team's choices. Maybe another team was in on Story, and he waited to sign, until after that team refused to up their offer or chose another option and took their offer away. I'm still optimistic Story will turn into a positive value contractual signing.
  5. Agreed. I just think the Sox upper management did not think 2021 was "the year." They kind of started thinking that way at the deadline, but even then, they did not make any major prospect for stud trades.
  6. It seams like he was a "big splash" signing at non big splash contractual obligations. Not the $140M/6 is peanuts, but people are talking Bogey at $170M/6 or $190M/7, and even more by a few. I still like the signing, even though, at the time, I thought we signed him to play SS.
  7. If all he can play is LF or DH, I'd pass, unless we trade Dugo and somehow acquire a RF'er, too. Your point seems spot on.
  8. I don't disagree, but it seems like the very highly competitive teams are the ones winning the vast majority of rings. Even when a team like the Nats or Braves win it all, we can see that much effort and resources went into building up their rosters. While teams like the '21 Sox and '22 Phillies widen our eyes to hopes of miracle runs to rings, they are few and far between. IMO, to win a ring, teams need to strategically plan for a window- somehow the Astros have created a 10 year window and then "POUNCE" in the year or two you think your chances are the highest. It's still no guarnatee, but to me, that seems like the best way to win a ring every 4-7 years.
  9. The NFL is probably better known for parity than MLB. It seems like teams like the Yanks are no longer just throwing money at every "hole" or weaker slots- only the Dodgers seem to be doing that. Other "model" franchises like the Astros, Rays and Braves seem to have figured out how to keep the pipeline strong and deep to a level they rate to b e competitive for many years to come. I sense the Sox are headed in that direction, but it's hard to know, until we start seeing results from our pipeline. I applaud Bloom for the effort, but the results time is here and now- maybe until 2024.
  10. Way less holes when compared to the winter before 2020, and the deadline trades of 2020 helped fill some, but we had some holes in the pen and rotation that are not hindsight observations. One can argue 1B and RF were not "holes," but we had nothing of note as back-up plans for those two slots. My point was maybe not really "holes," per se, and yes I'm walking back my statement, but not really enough championship caliber players to realistically think we had a strong enough chance at a ring to make one or two more "splash" signings beyond Story, and maybe going $19M over the tax line. I don't think upper management viewed 2022 as "the year." I don't think they viewed 2022 that way, either, but maybe the run by the Phillies, and to a lesser extent our run in 2021, might change that way of thinking.
  11. I know it's just theory. To be honest, I think 2021 surprised them, and that is why they spent some at the deadline. I'm pretty sure 2021 raised their expectations up as it did with fans, but I still think they knew they had too many holes in the roster to be considered a top competitive team, even if just about everything went right, which of course, it did not. Now, what are the true expectations for 2023? Was it just a snow job to talk about being much better in 2023, or did they really mean it? Maybe their hopes for incoming prospects is higher than most fans view it, or maybe they really do plan on spending right up to the line or blow past it, and re-set next winter. I'm leaning towards the 2024 season looking like the better chance at going all the way, so I think we re-set, this winter. I think we can get much better in 2023 while making no moves that hurt 2024, and some that help in 2024, too and beyond. (I hope so, too.)
  12. Certainly a logical position to hold. Maybe they thought they could sign Story and still re-set, but it seemed to me, as more and more players were showed interest in signed elsewhere, we were heading for an under-tax-line season- then, BAM! The Story signing. Your reasoning makes sense, but I still think there was a high priority to stay under in 2022, but circumstances changed or became more apparent to upper management, and the balance tilted towards spending more.
  13. According to cots, the Sox biggest pluses and minus from their EOY budget to BOY budget are as follows: in $Millions... +/- +25 '00>'01 (+4 in season) -6 '01>'02 (+2) -10 '02>'03 (+5) +23 '03>04 (+3) -7 '04>'05 (-7) +4 '05>'06 (+17) +6 '06>'07 (+12) -22 '07>'08 (+13) -26 '08>'09 (+19) +28 '09>'10 (+1) -7 '10>'11 (+10) +1 '11>'12 (-7) -14 '12>'13 (+22) -20 '13>'14 (+12) +16 '14>'15 (+1) +12 '15>'16 (+3) -3 '16>'17 (-8) +44 '17>'18 (-3) +6 '18>'19 (-8) ~-60 '19>'20 (-11) -4 '20>'21 (+7) -1 '21>'22
  14. It's not about last place finishing: it's about the status of the foundation and projected incoming and exciting farm help and younger players nearing prime. I do not think the big rotation purge was planned. I think they felt 2015 might be the start of "the window." In some ways, one could view 2023 or 2024 as being about the time to think a window is opening or about to open.
  15. OF'er Masataka Yoshida was just posted. Might the Sox kick some more tires?
  16. Close but not really large and not really long.
  17. No, it was what I thought from before 2021 even started. I thought they might go over the line in 2021 or 2022, but not both and likely neither. JH usually does not spend big, until he thinks we are a key player or two away from a ring window. My thoughts had nothing to do with transaction lock-outs.
  18. I always thought they viewed 2024 and beyond as the better chance at a ring. It looked that way all winter long, until the March Story signing.
  19. Certainly, Story might have always been on the burner, or even a sure bet signing once other signings did not materialize. At the time, before I knew about the arm issues, I thought he was a lock to play SS, at least starting in 2023, but we also needed a 2Bman. It appeared to me, the plan was to not go over the tax line in 2022. That is one reason I think the late Story signing was kind of a knee jerk decision. The puzzling part to me, was that we still could have gotten under the tax line with a little more creativeness by Bloom after the Story signing.
  20. If my theory is correct about the Story signing being a somewhat "unplanned" signing, that might explain why some earlier moves were not made, but before the Story signing we still had room for several "near miss" signings.
  21. He's also been a much better defender, and at key positions. I would not be shocked to find out Sox management thinks Story is worth more than Bogey. I think it's pretty close. Bogey is a better hitter- Story is a better defender and runner. I thought a $150-160/6 year deal would be fair. I'm not sure I'd go above $162M/6 ($27M x 6), but I wouldn't be upset, if we go a little higher.
  22. I get the frustration, too. I've felt it. On some of the "interested in" players, I'm glad we came up short, such as Matz, Baez and Suzuki. Certainly, Wacha, Story and Refsnyder worked out better and at less cost, yet we are left with a bad taste in our mouth. Maybe that was the garlic toast.
  23. I think that's what happened. I won't argue semantics, but a "guess" fits, too. In that light, the "lowball" offer was made before knowing what the Story offer would be. It's one possible reason for the apparent disconnect. It could also be true, they think Story was worth more than Bogey. It's all a guess. (or opinion)
  24. I'm not defending the low-ball offer, but one explanation is that maybe they felt Bogey signed the contract for $20M x3 after the opt out, and they viewed adding a $30M fourth year was not a low-ball. Story was a FA: Bogey was not, and that matters on contract offers. I disagree, but to me, it was not an extremely absurd first offer, if they had followed up quickly with something slightly bigger than Story's contract. In my own opinion, I don't even think they planned on signing Story when they made that Bogey offer. I think Henry heard the rumblings of anxious fans (I called them "crybaby fans" earlier and that pissed off our resident crybaby fan) and saw the drop in season ticket applications and NESN subscriptions and told Bloom to sign Story. Just my opinion.
  25. Wow, the Jays just traded Teoscar Hernandez to the Mariners for Erik Swanson & Adam Macko (a prospect!) TH has a 132 OPS+ since 2020 and 121 since 2018. He's not a plus defender, but GEEESH! Maybe Winker is a sure bet to be traded, now.
×
×
  • Create New...