Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,565
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. They'd have to do a lot of wheeling and dealing to add other top talent- yeah right- to change that from becoming the near unanimous view by all Sox fans.
  2. I'd rather have someone who can play RF like Conforto over Brantley. I'd prefer Andrus over a 2B option, but the Sox will likely take the one who accepts a 1 year deal, so maybe Andrus is out of the picture. I say no to Nate. His contract will be too long and too large, as will others, of course, but I'd go with Kluber. My second choice would be to sign 2 from Fulmer, Rogers and Chaffin and make Houck our #3/4 SP'er. Roll the dice with Sale and Paxton in hopes they can time their IL stints to never coincide. The, assume they both will be good. 1. Sale/Paxton combo 2. Whitlock 3. Houck 4. Bello 5. Pivetta or 1. Sale/Houck 2. Whitlock 3. Kluber 4. Bello 5. Pivetta (Houck in the pen.)
  3. Maybe the failures of Ben's major signings and even the Price signing and Porcello & Sale extensions have made the to brass put a halt to mega deals and look more towards the $140M/6 for Story and $85M/5 for Yoshida deals as "the way of the future." I'm thinking/hoping that we will spend large and long again, but they are waiting for the right "pounce time," and surely listening to the pessimism on this board, I think we might all agree, this team is not 1-2 major signings away from being a true ring contender. Now, had we been adding 1-2 every year, since DD left, we likely would be2, but the brakes were clearly applied, and when that foot comes fully off the brakes, only JH & Co. knows.
  4. It sure seems that way, but I still wonder how much of the coming up short has to do with JH & Co. I'm pretty sure they have a system for assigning value to players and the max they'd pay for someone they want or need, but is Bloom the main guy involved with the valuation process or the setting of all major offers? If he is, then that may be the driving force behind JH & Co. always saying no. Bloom might come to JH & Co and say, (Last spring) "We concluded Bogey is worth $170M/7, but think an offer of $180M/7 is acceptable. We discussed this number with BorA$$, and he said we are way off. Should we offer more?" Maybe JH & Co. said no, because they trusted the value Bloom & Co gave them. Maybe Bloom is not the major "value setter," or maybe JH & Co. are the ones being the idea that no large and long deals are to be given out, until a certain time- perhaps when they feel another priority is met (like a foundation is established worthy of spending larger on to get us over the top.) Maybe, someday we will find out what all the inner workings were in the Bogey case and other decisions made under Bloom, but for now, it's mostly speculation. We can no longer use what they say as any sort of evidence to support any of our opinions on what went down or is currently going down. In some ways the secrecy is helpful, but it makes it hard for plans to know what the hell is going on. When the team loses, the secrecy only compounds the frustration and anger.
  5. It's the pattern of the Sox winter: "Reported interest" then signing elsewhere. The actual signings had no or very little reports of Sox interest.
  6. It wasn't just Hosmer: 3.5 Groome 1.8 Rosier + 1.2 Ferguson = 3.0
  7. Some BTV values of interest: 6.7 Verdugo 6.5 McGuire 4.2 Paxton 2.9 Seabold 2.6 Winckowski 2.4 Hamilton 2.1 Abreu 1.9 Wong 1.8 Rosier 1.7 Valdez 1.4 German 1.2 Binelas & Ferguson 1.0 Kelly & Refsnyder 0.9 Pivetta 0.7 R Hern 0.5 Gambrell 0.3 C Hamilton 0.2 Downs & F Valdez 0.1 Kike, Ort & de la Rosa -0.3 Joely -5.7 Jansen -7.8 Barnes -37.4 Story 6.4 Bogaerts 3.5 Groome 1.9 Renfroe 0.0 JBJ -0.8 Betts -9.6 Beni -14.2 Vaz
  8. In Lux Tax $Millions 40 Judge 36 Cole 25 Stanton (-$3M paid by MIA) 25 Donaldson 23 Rodon 20 Rizzo 15 Severino 10 Hicks ~10 Torres
  9. According to MLBTR's top Free Agents, here is who is left: 23 Eovaldi 24 T Rogers 33 Profar 37 Drury 39 Chafin 40 Segura 41 Wacha 43 Brantley 44 Conforto 47 J Turner 48 Kluber 50 Rucinski Andrus Fulmer S Lugo W Myers Fujinami Belt Carpenter Smyly Cueto M Moore
  10. The loss of Bogey and JD on offense is big, despite them only having 135 RBI combined, but in all honesty, don't you expect improved offense from... 1B (Casas> Dalbec/Cordero/Hosmer) 2B (Strory over 1/2 Story) LF (Yoshida> Dugo/Pham/Cordero CF (Kike > 1/2 Kike) RF (Dugo & Ref > JBJ/Duran & Co) C and DH may be slight losses, but our catchers hit like .680 and our DHs hit near .760, McGuire & Wong may hit near .680 and a DH combo of Dugo/Yoshida/Dalbec/Arroyo/Ref may hit .760, too. The big loss is Bogey and the lack of RH'd depth. One big RH'd bat and a solid SP'er and I may feel more optimistic. Add a Devers extension, and... (I can't say it, yet.)
  11. We sign him or trade him by May 1st- likely by opening day.
  12. I like Mata, Kelly, German and Walter ahead of Murphy.
  13. So, if Bello didn't advance so quickly and graduate, we'd have a top 5 pictcher. Mata is close enough to count. Walter, Perales & Wikelman have hopes, and we have some very young pitchers on the rise.
  14. The optimism here is deafening.
  15. $177M/7. I had thought he'd be a good option, if Bogey took $200M/8 and he'd get $140M/6, but with Mayer on the horizon, I guess he never was an option. It's Andrus or Story with fill in the blank at 2nd.
  16. I just feel we didn't have to get back to that position.
  17. I'm not feeling very cheery about the winter moves, so far. A Devers extension would help, for the long term, but 2023 looks depressing, despite the odd belief I have that we should be better at 1B, 2B, 3B, LF, CF, RF and maybe even or close to even at DH and Catcher. Our pen is better. We are worse at SS, SP1, SP2. Those 3 slots are big step downs, but overall, it doesn't look as bad as I feel. Right now, I won't try to convince anyone it's snot so bad, because I'm not feeling it, myself.
  18. Good points. Should I list losing Cordero under the "add" column?
  19. I'm actually glad to hear this.
  20. Thanks. I'll edit.
  21. Certainly not much to be optimistic about. It looks like trades and a couple second tier signings is our only hope for 2023, otherwise, it's wait till next year, already.
  22. Can the Orioles really say they should be better at over half their starting 9? Did the Jays and Rays improve? Is the addition of Rodon outweigh the loss of Taillon, Chapman, Gallo and others? The winter is not over, There will likely be a trade flurry that improves some teams and maybe hurts others in 2023.
  23. They only get the ones where no reports say they are "in on."
  24. Has anyone done a breakdown on all the key players lost and gained by each AL East team? Please add names I missed: BAL? Add: A Frazier, K Gibson, Cordero Lost: Jorge Lopez, Mancini, Lyles, Aguilar TOR? Add: Bass, Swanson Lost: T Hernandez, Stripling TBR? Add: Eflin Lost: Kluber, Zunino NYY? Add: Rodon, Kahnle Lost: Taillon, Chapman, Gallo, Britton, BOS: Add: Yoshida, Jansen, Martin, Joely, Mills (if you want to count more from Casas and Bello, Kelly, German, Wong and some prospects or even more from Kike & Story, Sale, Paxton...) McGuire Lost: Bogey, Nate, JD, Wacha, Hill, Vaz, Strahm, JBJ, Diekman, Downs I know I'm missing a lot. I know other teams are expecting more from many players who were injured in 2022 or not called up until later in the season.
  25. No, it does not matter, if sometimes you said CF D. You said CF. I said you said just CF and you denied saying and called me a liar. The fact that you still can't just say, "I meant to say CF" speaks volumes. Yes, I have said things that aren't true or realized I wasw rong later and admitted it and apologized, when needed. That's the big difference, and if you knew what being on a high hose meant, you'd see it is you on the horse, not me. I was wrong to say you hated Cora, when you never said it. I said I was wrong and apologized. It didn't help, because yo keep bringing it up, as if I'm still saying it I was wrong to say Kike had the best season on defense in CF in my lifetime when a half dozen others were just as good or better. I agreed when called out for my over exuberance on a current Sox player I cheer for. You'll never say you even made a slight mistake, mistyped or didn't mean exactly what you wrote. Instead, you double and triple down on a your false statement and blame others for not knowing what words mean.
×
×
  • Create New...