Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    107,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    144

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I realize CF is more demanding, especially in Yankee Stadium, but it's not a minefield.
  2. Agreed, but I'm looking for more than mere "improvement." I'm all about Quality over quantity, at the moment, but if we go third tier, I'd hope we get 3 not 2 form that group. That would further strengthen the pen, especially with mulit-inning guys that would allow us to yank any SP'er early and often.
  3. Will he, again? I'm sure he will pitch, again, and I'm sure he will do fine, for a while, but I would not pay more than $280-300M for him. I would not be upset, if we paid $300-350M for him, but I doubt that gets it done, so I'm not even thinking about him, anymore. He's the type of signing I hope someone like the Yanks sign. His contract will cripple them for year.
  4. I agree. We need an ace not a bunch of 2-4's. I do think signing 3 from Stroman, Lugo, Imanaga or maybe Wacha/Clevinger would make our rotation significantly better than last year. Need I remind some just how bad our starters were, last year. Hell a 4.10 ERA is a 1/2 to 2 run improvement over much of what we saw in 2023. ERA as SP, only.... (listed by most GS) 4.24 Bello 28 GS (in the '24 rotation) 4.51 Crawford 23 5.01 Houck 21 4.30 Sale 21 (in '24 rotation) 4.50 Paxton 19 4.66 Pivetta 16 5.23 Whitlock 10 6.26 Kluber 9 We had 14 GS by pitchers with an SP ERA of .623 or higher. We had another 31 GS by SP'ers with an ERA between 5.00 and 5.25. We had another 60 between 4.50 and 4.66. I'm certainly hoping we look to improve to some guys who can go 3.50 to 3.75, but 3 guys between 3.80 and 4.40 could be a big boost.
  5. I'm not saying that's what he'd accept, but to be that's my top pay for a DH.
  6. Does CF have spikes in it, or what? Judge could hurt himself crashing into the short RF wall, just as easily as stepping on a CF spike.
  7. I know the vast majority of posters and experts would doubt tyhe Sox sign 3 SP'ers, but if we miss out on the top 2 tier pitchers, would anyone be okay with sign 3 from this group? Stroman Imanaga Lugo Clevinger Giolito Wacha If yes, which 3. (If no, which 3 do you prefer?)
  8. Based on not signing Nola, Gray, ERod and Maeda?
  9. Teel for India...lmao! I wouldn't give up Paulino.
  10. I'm hoping for better than that. If we go that low, I'd hope we sign 3 SP'ers.
  11. They'd be replacing... 19 GS Paxton 4.50 (96 IP/ 4.68 FIP) 9 GS Kluber 7.04 (55 IP/ 7.11 FIP) What do you think?
  12. Yes, SD. I fixed it. I'd rather have Urias/Reyes/EValdez than India.
  13. Ohtani would not get $280M from BOS.
  14. I think they put Judge in CF, and Grisham is the #4. If Grish batted RH'd, I'd platoon Dugo with him.
  15. ...and deep down on the prospect list, too. I know the 26th and 40th slots on the rosters usually are not super impactful, but I find it very interesting how the choices are made on the "odd men out."
  16. If you guys could get a legit leadoff hitter with a .380+ OBP, batting Soto & Judge 2-3 would be lethal. (Torres came closest, last year, at .347.)
  17. 2Bmen mentioned as possible trade targets: Kim from SD, who will be costly. Polanco from MN, who has MI depth.
  18. We could both be wrong. DHam could end up the best prospect below #20.
  19. Adding 3 OF'ers sure addressed that big need area, quickly.
  20. Many times, yes. He did offer Nate more than TEX and on Eflin, I guess about the same as TBR. Many felt he guessed the Yoshida market wrongly. Most of his signings involved $10M/1 or less, an area he was supposed to be an expert.
  21. I wish I felt like I was joshing.
  22. I like some after 27 more than DHam at 21, but I can see your point.
  23. Well, people keep filling the seats and paying for NESN. We may not be back to pre-COVID levels, but with higher ticket and cable costs, the money is still flowing in: win or lose. Yes, they must think we are dumm.
  24. Anywhere from 20-39 looks okay to me. They all are pretty interchangeable in that group.
×
×
  • Create New...