Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    104,787
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    130

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. The first pick in MLB is not like the NFL or NBA. Getting to top 3-5 is still a nice spot to get to. Plus, now you get more bonus money and IFA bonus money, when you suck.
  2. Why just pick a 3 year period? Yes, they had 3 really awful seasons (2011-2013,) but their tank last longer than that. They drafted Springer in 2011, after a 76 win 2010 season. They drafted Bregman & Tucker in 2015, after a 70 win season in 2014. They also drafted McCullers with the 41st pick in '12.
  3. Either way works. I kind of like the idea that a bad team picking high can trade their top pick for something of value and then still spend more on lower slot picks, and still make out very well. It would make it hard for the "better team" to manage the money, and may lose out on some lower level picks.
  4. I did not forget him. He didn't really get better or worse, after leaving. He is about like he was from '21-'22. It's weird how people assume people forget things, just because their posts aren't in great detail.
  5. It would be difficult to apply the cap numbers to a changing draft order. I guess an adjustment could be made with every trade. I like the idea of trades being allowed. I don't care much about the specifics.
  6. It's weird how they don't do this, already. It would add a whole new dimension to draft day.
  7. Back then, many teams like the Sox and Rays were able to stockpile picks by losing players to free agency. In 2011, we had 4 picks in the top 40. The Rays had 10 in the top 60 and 12 in the top 89, that year. They got Snell with their 7th pick at #52.
  8. I forgot them? I listed some and said "among others."
  9. Springs was the big punch in the gut. The martin Perez turn-around hurt, too. ERA+ 89 in 2 years w BOS in 176 IP 118 in 2 years w TEX in 338 IP, afterwards He did drop off in 2023, but if he was the 2022 season he had w TEX for us, we may have made the WS
  10. There seems to be a pattern of ex-Sox players improving after leaving Boston. Brasier Kike Even JD had his best OPS+ since 2019. Payamps Martin Perez Springs I guess one could counter with names like... Vaz JBJ Beni Workman Among others.
  11. Duran was more of an outlier than a common occurrence. Verdugo was never thought to be a plus RF'er. In fact, it seemed we went out of our way to keep him out of RF, until the Tommy Pham trade. He improved. Devers seemed to be improving, then poof! It does happen, but I agree, we should not expect it to happen. I'd like to hear that Casas is working hard on his D over the winter.
  12. There certainly is flameout potential to Bloom's drafts, but it might take many years to get the final results. The amount of top picks going to HS players will prolong the final grade submission. It didn't help that his first draft was during COVID and was just 4 rounds deep. Yorke still shows promise. Drohan and Jordan, not so much, but still a little. 2021's draft included Mayer, but there are a few prospects clinging to some hopes: E R-C, Hickey, Dobbins, Guerrero, Troye and maybe Kavadas. Romero, the top pick from '22, could turn out a bust. C Coffey is about out of hopes. Anthony looks like a big prize (79th pick.) Rogers, Meidroth, I Coffey, Hoppe and maybe a couple others have some promise remaining. The '23 draft is still pretty fresh, but Teel did nothing to cause any more doubts. A few others looked good out of the gates. I'm hopeful Bloom's prospects do better than Ben & DD's: DD: Casas, Houck, Crawford Ben: Beni, Kopech, Beeks Theo's last draft blew away all of Ben's and DD;'s drafts combined: Betts, JBJ, Barnes, TShaw, Noe Ramirez
  13. So, if we add nobody and lose all or FAs to be plus Turner, is this the opening day 26? C: Wong & McGuire 1B: Casas 2B: Urias & Reyes SS: Story 3B: Devers LF: Duran & Refsnyder CF: Rafaela & Abreu RF: Verdugo DH: Yoshida SP1: Bello SP2: Sale SP3: Crawford SP4: Pivetta SP5: Houck Closer: Jansen RP2: Martin RP3: Winckowski RP4: Schreiber RP5: Whitlock RP6: Bernardino RP7: Murphy RP8: Mata (out of options) or Kelly
  14. DD only had 3 first round picks. Their 2019 first round pick (#33) was dropped to #43 due to going over the lux tax (per soxprospects.com). His only other first pick was Casas in 2018. DD's pitcher's drafted: 2016: 4 of top 6 picks (Groome, S Anderson, Shawaryn, Nogosek) 2017: 4 of top 6 picks (Houck, Thompson, Scherff, Schellenger) 2018: 2 of top 6 picks (Feltman & Ward) 2019: 3 of top 3 picks (Zeferjahn, Song, Murphy) 13 pitchers drafted in the top 6: Houck looks good and could get better. Murphy looked okay in '23 but is a long shot. The rest are very long shots. He was basically 1 for 13. Among the 11 non pitchers taken in the top 6 picks: Casas '18 Dalbec '16 Lugo '19 Brannon '17 (Duran in 7th rd '18) Maybe 1 for 11, here.
  15. It could still be based solely on crunching numbers, that include risk of injury and other variables pitchers bring to the formula that batters don't.
  16. More than 20 pitchers, but I added "but that is absurd."
  17. Any team that even thinks about adopting a strategy of drafting 20 for 20 pitchers is a complete joke. 20 for 20 non pitchers might make some sense, but that is absurd.
  18. He works and studies so hard on hitting, I hope he dedicates himself to improving on D. I think he will. (I thought Dalbec would, too, so what do I know?) That was an awful corner IF defense, this year. When Kike was at SS and Arroyo at 2B, OMG!
  19. He is such a lost cause. I think he's still owed $115M/4. I'm not sure if I'd want him for $15M/4.
  20. According to a certain contingent on this board, I wanted Chaim Bloom back for 10 more years. He's MY GUY!
  21. Agreed. I will say that a lot of promising catching prospects never pan out, but I still fully agree.
  22. I get the need for a big RH'd bat, but I'm tired of having a team with 3 LF'ers and hardly anyone who can hit and play CF or RF for 2 straight seasons.
  23. It's true. most OF'ers would be best in LF, but the guys I'm talking about would be downright scary in CF and RF, especially in Fenway. Yoshida Refsnyder Duran
×
×
  • Create New...