Kimmi
-
Posts
27,883 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Kimmi
-
LOL That sums it up pretty well. FTR, I think Nicole De Boer is cute.
-
^^^This
-
Well, Jacko's mistake is being a Yankees fan to begin with. Outside of that, I can't fault him for defending his team. Not that there's always merit to his defense, but as fans, that's what we do. We're all homers to a certain extent. Just don't be hypocritical about it, and say that something is okay for the Yankees, but then not okay for the Sox.
-
I have been reading some of the older and archived threads during my boredom known as "snow days". Even though I don't recognize most of the names, they have been a good source of entertainment.
-
No real issue. Just something to debate to pass the long, cold, dark hours known as the offseason.
-
It's not the first time we've heard speculation about this in recent weeks. I honestly believe that he is a very good businessman, but that he tries to assert too much influence into baseball ops, and things do not go well when he does. We also heard a couple of years ago that Bill James was going to be given a larger voice in baseball decisions. I think that is synonymous with saying Lucchino would have less influence. I think that there is some substance to this story. I can only hope that it's true.
-
It's not stupid. We have no say in what other teams do (or our own team for that matter), but that has never stopped us from voicing our opinions on the topic anyway. Isn't that the purpose of message boards?
-
No argument with that, but I don't like it. I think if a player is going to be enshrined, the honor should be reserved for the truly elite. Of course, what "truly elite" means is open to debate.
-
While I understand the idea of avoiding surgery if at all possible, I think Tanaka is only avoiding the inevitable. IMO, he should have had the surgery last season. I'm no doctor, but I don't think he's going to make it through this season. I love conspiracy theories, but I don't think there's any contract plot behind prolonging having the surgery. If the Yankees are doing this to benefit themselves at the expense of a player's health, then shame on them.
-
How long do you think the Yankees will be able continue this offseason's philosophy of not handing out any big contracts? IMO, if the Yanks miss the playoffs again, and the Red Sox win the WS (just speaking hypothetically), I see the Yankees throwing caution to the wind and having another big spending spree next offseason.
-
I think we all have to take a wait and see approach. None of us knows for sure how this season is going to play out. I agree, it's a difficult team to project because there are several question marks. Not all of those question marks will break in our favor, but certainly some of them will. Knowing which ones will and which ones won't is the tricky part. If I had to put a number of wins on the season at this point, I'd say 88.
-
True enough, I don't really care. But any reason to tweak the Yankees is a good reason.
-
That quote about sums up my feelings on the HOF and having numbers retired. These recognitions should be reserved for an elite, small percentage of players for whom, when you hear their names, everyone is in agreement that they belong. If there has to be this much debate over whether a player is deserving or not, IMO, that makes them very good, but not worthy of the award.
-
I don't know what the criteria are for retiring numbers, but it does seem like maybe they are bestowing that honor to loosely. This is not to knock any of those players, but I've always felt that if an honor is questioned or debated, then that player probably doesn't truly deserve such a high honor. This is similar to Hall of Fame inductees. It lessens the integrity of the award.
-
That makes sense. I just felt like I was in the twilight zone for a minute. LOL
-
I don't think we can carry his weak bat either. The team already has Vazquez, who could show improvement, but will still likely be considered a weak bat. If we had a stronger starting rotation, it might be possible. But as of now, this team is depending on its offense to carry it through many of the games.
-
Yes, I think it was just coincidence that his struggles began at about the same time that he moved to 3B. Those struggles also coincide with opposing pitchers attacking him differently (more sliders down and away), resulting in Bogaerts becoming less patient at the plate.
-
So, I made a few posts yesterday and this morning (about an hour ago), and was wondering why I was the only one posting. I logged back in just now, and those posts have disappeared, and all these posts from yesterday that I couldn't see are now here. Was I posting on a phantom board? Weird.
-
I agree Spud. I don't think that the coaches would have him change an approach that had been so successful for him, but your guess is as good as mine. I'm guessing maybe he just starting pressing a little and became overanxious. The more he struggled, the more he pressed. As you said, he is still very young. IMO, it's normal growing pains for a youngster, and he will continue to learn and improve.
-
I'm not sure why he would have taken the move to 3rd as a dig. They moved him to 3rd, not because of what he was doing at SS, but because of Middlebrooks' injury and underperformance at 3B. I didn't look at it as a slight toward Bogaerts, but rather as a vote of confidence in him that he could handle it, since he showed some success there the previous year. He showed some signs of breaking out of the slump towards the end of the season. The Sox FO seems to be really high on him. I am optimistic about seeing some big things from him this season.
-
Fair enough. The point remains though that his move to 3rd is not to be blamed for his slump.
-
Good read at Fangraphs today on Bogaerts' slump. To me, this indicates that his slump was due to growing pains - his inability to adjust to the pitchers' adjuments, rather than being a result of his unhappiness at being moved to 3rd base, for anyone who blamed his slump on that. http://www.fangraphs.com/community/why-did-xander-bogaerts-stop-walking/
-
Ouch. Anyone who can tweak the Yankees like that is all right in my book.
-
I like it. The Sox winning the division and the Yankees not making the playoffs - what could be better than that?
-
Not trying to diss on Fred, but it is something I'll have to see to believe. I believe he has every intention of not complaining, but whether he can actually do it or not is another story.
