Kimmi
-
Posts
27,847 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Kimmi
-
I would be sad to see Victorino go, but that deal could make sense, depending on the specific terms of the deal. Lee would be a risk, but he would only be a one year risk.
-
When I first heard about the Hanley signing, his attitude was a concern to me. However, everything that I have read and heard since then has changed my mind about that. He really does seem to have matured, and he seems to have a great attitude about being back in Boston. The rapport/chemistry among these guys seems to be strong.
-
LOL Spud. You told me logic wasn't allowed, so I went with this.
-
Whenever possible, getting players for "just money" is preferable to having to pay both money and players. And good post. You should post more often.
-
Well, he is kind of cute.
-
My head somewhat agrees with you, but the emotional side of me wouldn't be at all happy about sending Pedroia packing. Emotions aside, however, even with some declining offense, Pedroia has great value to this team.
-
LOL It's not that important, so don't go all Fred on me about it.
-
Yes, I am all too familiar with that type of thing. It's almost like that is a requirement of being a Yankees fan. LOL I don't know how Jacko was back then, but he doesn't seem that bad now, outside of rooting for the wrong team. At least he acknowledged a good signing for the Sox. The whole chart thing is too funny though. Thanks for the explanation.
-
I like charts.
-
I don't claim to know or understand it all. Far from it. But I find the whole area of analytics absolutely fascinating. I remember my first post ever on a forum was about BABIP. LOL FOs have much more data at their disposal than we have. I am sure that the FO signs their players partly due to reasons about which we have no clue.
-
I've seen a couple of references to "the chart". What chart might that be?
-
Thank you for having the integrity to post that. Believe me, I know it's not easy to watch a player that you want sign with the 'enemy'. For a Yankees fan, you're ok.
-
I was not at all expecting the Sox to sign him, but the more I read about him, the more I like the signing. This signing gives the Sox so much flexibility, both in terms of the positions that he can play and in terms of making trades more possible.
-
Fine, but even if we're talking FOs, sabermetrics are not what I would consider conventional wisdom, certainly not in the way that "we need a speedy runner to bat lead off" is conventional (and false) wisdom. Saber guys are always questioning and challenging their previous findings, along with developing new analytics and technology. The field is never stagnant enough to become 'conventional'.
-
I don't think sabermetrics can be considered conventional wisdom yet, at least as far as the general fan population. Among FOs? Yes, in some ways. However, the stat geeks are not resting on their laurels. As the game changes and technology becomes more advanced, they are continually refining and re-analyzing their data. They realize that what they found to be true in 2005 just might not be valid any longer. They are willing to question and re-investigate their own findings.
-
To a certain degree, I agree that the FO has to own the record no matter what the reasons. There is always something they could have done differently or better. However, there is a difference between a team coming in last place due to complete incompetence of the FO and a team coming in last place due to factors that could not have been realistically expected. In other words, for me, the two last place finishes do not signify an inept FO, but rather things just breaking terribly bad.
-
In baseball, anecdotal evidence is usually cherry-picked and full of bias. People are going to tend to remember the incidents that support their claim. It sounds good, but there is not much substance behind it.
-
Well, this is exactly what the sabermetric community has done. They've challenged, and disproved, many of the conventional beliefs about baseball that have been accepted as true without any proof whatsoever. No one is saying that the new wisdom invalidates everything that went before, but it does invalidate a lot of the previously held beliefs.
-
Another solid post SK.
-
MLB introduces rules to speed up the pace of games.
Kimmi replied to Northern Star's topic in Other Baseball
As much as I advocate for the use of analytics and technology for the scouting and assessment side of baseball, I am against the use of technology during a game as a means of affecting or altering the outcome of the game. I am against instant replay, and automating balls and strikes would be an atrocity to the game, IMO. -
User Name seems like a pretty knowledgable guy. So do you. I get that you two don't get along, for whatever reasons, but I'm not trying to take sides here. Both of you have some very good insight to offer, as do all the posters here. If it seems like I'm taking his side, it's only because his opinions seem to be very much in line with mine. It is nothing personal against you. I like you.
-
MLB introduces rules to speed up the pace of games.
Kimmi replied to Northern Star's topic in Other Baseball
While I get frustrated at times watching pitchers who take forever between pitches, I really don't want to see a pitch clock implemented. I like it when pitchers and batters can get inside of each other's heads. As far as automating balls and strikes, I hope that is something that will never come about. -
I think we fundamentally agree on more things than it seems. Sometimes, I think you just like to argue. LOL
-
Why do I give more weight to the Juggernaut? Well, for one, because he's a freaking juggernaut! And for two, because I agree with what he says and his posts support my argument. I'm not trying to say that you don't know what you're talking about. I'm sure that what you say is true for your experiences. I'm also sure that what User Name says is true for his experiences. The point remains, just because something hasn't worked for you company doens't mean that we should trash the whole concept for MLB. For baseball, the incorporation of analytics and technology have been successful.
-
Jacko, the optimism is not necessarily with the rotation itself, per se, but with the overall team. You can't look at the rotation in a vacuum. This rotation is not going to set the world on fire and it leaves a lot of people thinking "meh". However, when you consider several other factors, there is reason to be optimistic that it will be good enough to keep the team in contention, at least until the Sox can add another starter. As far as optimism for the rotation itself, there are reasons to be hopeful that these guys can show improvement this year. Buccholz is a flip of the coin, but when he's good, he's very good.
