Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Kimmi

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    27,852

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Kimmi

  1. Kimmi
    We'll see what happens. We have some pieces that we can trade to acquire our needed infielder, for sure. I just hope that it doesn't hurt too much. I still say get Duran cracking at 2nd base. He can platoon with Romy. That would probably be a decent 2nd base duo.
  2. Kimmi
    Not even clownishness. It was a negotiation that didn't work out in the Red Sox favor. (Or I could argue that it did work out in the Red Sox favor.) Simple as that.
  3. Kimmi
    No. I would have welcomed Bregman back with open arms, but I would not have been fine with the contract.
  4. Kimmi
    What those guys are saying may very well be right. Or it might not be. They certainly have more credibility than I have on the matter. With all that said, I'm still not seeing anything about the deal being botched. Breslow made a more than fair offer. Bregman was apparently upset that Breslow would not match the Cubs offer, and Breslow was right not to match it. Bregman chose the Cubs. No botching going on there. Now, if you want an example of a botched contract situation, I give you Jon Lester.
  5. Kimmi
    He didn't say he was bidding against himself. He said he wanted to avoid bidding against himself. There's a difference. And yes, we would have hated the deal. As they say, sometimes, the best deals are the ones that are never made. So what was really botched in all of this?
  6. Kimmi
    Being wrong about whether they had the highest offer on the table does not mean the deal was botched. Breslow was not going to match the Cubs offer, regardless.
  7. Kimmi
    Perhaps Bregman wanted to stay, but in order to do that, he has to be willing to negotiate. It doesn't sound like Bregman was willing to do that. It sounds like like the Sox had to match the Cubs offer or he was walking.
  8. Kimmi
    Not sure how that translates in "botched" either.
  9. Kimmi
    Those people that are lining up to tell us what happened don't really know what happened either. They don't.
  10. Kimmi
    How do we know what Breslow's line in the sand was? The line in the sand is not necessarily the first offer or even subsequent offers. Nor should it be. It takes two to tango. Bregman got a better offer, which he accepted. Breslow was not willing to go that high. That doesn't translate into "Breslow botched it."
  11. Kimmi
    There has to be someone out there who can fill our needs. It probably won't be as big an impact bat as we'd like. It also probably won't be a Gold Glove defender. But there's someone out there who can provide a solid infield upgrade and depth and won't cost us a fortune. I have no clue who that is. I leave that up to the posters here who love to do that stuff, and do a good job of it. Personally, I wouldn't trade away our young pitching. I'm still really against trading Duran, Rafaela, or Abreu, but I understand that it might be the cost of acquiring some infield help.
  12. Kimmi
    I honestly think I'm more concerned with shoring up the infield defense than I am with securing a big bat. Of course, I fully admit that the first time we lose a game 1-0 or 2-1, I will be criticizing the weak, pathetic offense.
  13. Kimmi
    Hopefully, it doesn't come to that. I'm just mulling around some ideas in case no one else is acquired. I don't think that the worst case scenario of staying status quo with our infield is as bad an option as others think it is, until that inevitable injury occurs. To be clear, I really think that we need to add an infielder. I just don't think it spells doomsday if we don't.
  14. Kimmi
    After signing Suarez and upgrading our pitching, I won't be extremely upset if we don't add a 2nd or 3rd baseman, but I agree that we really do need to add an infielder. That's the last piece to make this offseason complete, IMO. I'd be okay if we added a defensive oriented player over a big bat.
  15. Kimmi
    There is so much more that goes on behind the scenes that we are not privy to. We need an inside source. We need a mole. LOL
  16. Kimmi
    The player's ego certainly plays a large role in players going after the most money.
  17. Kimmi
    That is not really my concern. The players in the top tier are making more than enough money. My concern is that by deferring some (or a lot) of the money, teams have more financial flexibility to spend in the present. They are, in a sense, cheating the system.
  18. Kimmi
    I don't disagree that teams that spend more have an advantage, on average, over teams that spend less. I guess what I'm hoping for with the 'no deferrals' is that it would force the Dodgers to spend less if they're not able to shift that money around. I do think that there are teams that are not spending enough money on payroll. I don't think the Red Sox are one of those teams. And I think that the Dodgers have gone beyond overboard with their spending.
  19. Kimmi
    I am still thinking that the Red Sox will add either a 2nd baseman or a 3rd baseman to take care of the infield situation. As I've said many times, we need some better infield depth, if nothing else. And, if nothing else, the Sox should at least acquire a LH 2B to platoon with Romy.
  20. Kimmi
    I still get the sense that people turned on him, but fair enough. It would be nice if we could get a long-standing 2nd baseman. I thought that Vaughn Grissom was going to be it (not that I liked the Sale trade), but that didn't turn out well at all.
  21. Kimmi
    Deferred money 1) lowers the AAV so that teams take less of a hit on the luxury tax, and 2) frees up current money for the team to spend on other players.
  22. Kimmi
    They turned on him in the sense that people would now be quick to trade him, when at the start of last season, he was deemed our 2nd baseman for the foreseeable future.
  23. Kimmi
    Also, I'm not sure why it is assumed that when the Red Sox fail to sign a player that the GM must have botched it. I'm sure that has happened, but I would assume that, more often than not, the deal did not happen because of reasons other than being botched.
  24. Kimmi
    Breslow is not a buffoon. Calculated, yes. He may also be cold, but I think you have to have a degree of coldness in order to be a good GM. I would not make a good GM. I would have still had the entire 2004 teams playing for the Red Sox 10 years later.
  25. Kimmi
    This is awesome and well-deserved Maddie! Congrats! I always enjoy reading your pieces. Keep them coming!
×
×
  • Create New...