Hitch
-
Posts
3,148 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Hitch
-
I'll +2 the comments on moon's value to this board.
-
Haha!
-
Yeah same here. I was sceptical he was as good as was being proclaimed. Boy oh boy, was I wrong on that one. What a hitter. And his defence is okay, too.
-
Yep. This has been coming for some time now.
-
Congratulations Hugh. Not for the lack of sex, obviously...
-
What an utterly bizarre post there spud. You older fellas sure have a lot of anger. Anyway I'll leave it there, the constant lying is too grinding. Plus its only 10pm...I still have to masturbate 3 times before sleep.
-
Oops double post.
-
He also edited his post a couple of times because he was tripping over his own words when trying to make it look like he hadn't.
-
You think the Cubs would entertain that offer?
-
Why on earth would they do that? edit: The Cubs I mean.
-
Yeah this how I feel, too. You can never have enough starting pitching.
-
I've also learned: people who point out your mistakes/desperate attempts to avoid having to say "I was wrong" = Troll. It's been a YUGE learning day for me, Donald.
-
If I've learned anything from the past 24 hours, it's that some people really aren't happy with the idea of using their comments to form an opinion on their comments. Step easy Kimmi...
-
Yeah, it's a fair point. I'm hoping Herrera has set the market. Then we should be able to pick up somebody very decent. I do worry our lack of depth in the minors hurts us though.
-
"Juuuuuust a bit outside!" Bob Uecker/Umpire to Clay Buchholz
-
What an odd way to look at it.
-
It does feel like Bradley is due to break out. The amount of hard hit balls he's hit for outs recently seems to be crazy. His breakout is coming, I can feel it.
-
Zach Britton has to be the one we are targeting. My worry is we just do not have the pieces we'd be comfortable trading to take him away. With a it o luck, tat market is set by Herrera's deal, but something tells me possibly not.
-
Oh for goodness sake. "Piss off. f*** off. Troll." All in the last page and a bit for having your words quoted back to you. You're so thin skinned I think a paper cut would likely kill you. You're the type of man that feels it would diminish you if you had to admit you are wrong, aren't you? I shouldnt expect any different, really. You've been this way for the 5 years I've been reading this board.
-
It'll take a while, but I will learn to live with this.
-
*sigh* Yes, it was irresponsible. This is patently obvious. You said that she reported it without knowing who Hanley was. I then said that a reporter does background checks on people before actually mentioning their name in connection with a crime. This is standard. It is why the Oregon Post got the story about Luke Heimlich being an admitted pedophile. Because they run a background check on him because he was about to be drafted and it showed up in the records. So even if they didn't know who Hanley was, they soon would have. Of course that point doesn't matter because you then followed it up a few minutes later with the above. So the reporter did actually know who he was now, but knew nothing of him. And again, I feel the need to point out the stupidity of this statement. They knew he was a professional ball player but didn't actually know anything about him. Quite why you've brought it back to the point (last discussed 3/4 pages ago) that the reporting was knee-jerk is anyone's guess. My guess is it was easier to go back to that than say "yeah I got it wrong on my first reply".
-
I'm not sure why you've pivoted to this from what we were discussing, but no, I don't disagree with that as I've already said on the previous page.
-
Yes, I understand what you are saying. I think you have misread the context of my post if you think that reply is in keeping, or arguing against, what I was saying. My post was saying that a journalist would run checks on a name of anyone they were about to out publicly, never mind a Red Sox player they knew. I was also pointing out A700's lie and then stupidity of his subsequent new position of the reporter knowing of Hanley, but then somehow....not knowing him. edit: Ah I just saw your post above. No problem.
-
Lie. Get called on it. Lie about the lie. Call somebody a troll for pointing out said lies. And they say the art of conversation is dead.
-
I have no idea what your reply has to do with my post.