Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

sk7326

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,633
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sk7326

  1. His took time off for treatment. We have to assume he is fine - or that his illness is being treated. He has certainly done a solid job.
  2. For Kelly his fastball is straight and his command is not great. Kimbrel is better at both. And Kimbrel pitches backwards more now.
  3. The electronics themselves are probably (from what I read) not accurate enough either ... and there is more to figure out in terms of implementation. But again, that doesn't mean they can't get there - just have to figure out whether it is something MLB wants to seriously push.
  4. That's what the medicine is for.
  5. Kimbrel? maybe 2 guaranteed years with an option for year 3.
  6. The technology has a ways to go - but MLB clearly should invest in it. The home plate ump still has a valuable function - but the part of the job which he is A) worst at, most likely to get into a fight over and C) most likely to put on an unconscionable umpshow over ... goes away
  7. No - it just means a GM is looking to provide options. Almost every player will go through waivers in August.
  8. Put another way - there has never been a team which I would taken vs the field once the playoffs start ...
  9. I do wonder how much Betts playing next to him just removes some of the possibilities to show superior range.
  10. This is all true - it does make me wonder whether a team that DID try that could get some advantage - a team like San Diego who plays in a cavernous park or whatever.
  11. I think it is probably fair to say that his range is more good/very good than outstanding - and the defensive metrics clearly focus on that. He doesn't get credit for an uncommonly good throwing arm for a CF. It also is noteworthy that he also plays next to a RF with outstanding range ... which I imagine has to hurt him a little bit.
  12. there is value in all of that ... but it's a "nice to have" more than essential. What is essential is not making outs. Now, that being said - I wonder if there is a market gap for a team that DOES try to bring back the 1980s Cardinals. That is a fair question. The same way that with all these teams swinging for the fences, the Royals of 2015 (or the Sox of this year) not striking out suddenly has an edge.
  13. Rings are what teams play for. At the same time - the playoffs are SO wild that you have to take a zen approach. I mean - the reason the Sox Curse always felt more authentic to me than the Cubbies one was that (since 1967) the Red Sox were usually really good. I mean, I've seen an 82-79 team win the World Series and a 116-46 team not able to make the World Series. You just hope you have a great month.
  14. The Red Sox have one of the league's two best players entering free agency once he turns 28 ... free agents of that age and quality (assuming he is healthy) just don't hit the market that often. But the Red Sox will certainly be in a good position to do something.
  15. It is proving a counterfactual which is hard ... certainly Cora has not hurt, and I think it is at least possible the young guys have benefited from him. I am more comfortable saying that once you add JD Martinez (and get a great season) to a team of young studs who all make leaps or mini-leaps ... you can improve a 93 win team.
  16. If that happens it is because of ownership choices ...
  17. He has a chance to realize the career that Fred Lynn's body prevented.
  18. I think every team that signs a UFA to a long deal accept the back end will hurt - it is whether the front end can make the overall thing a net plus. With Martinez it is a clear yes.
  19. Red Sox have graduations to deal with - we'll see what happens. Every team faces it.
  20. Players should embrace their free agency - nothing wrong with that. The Red Sox will have a strong position as a bidder. I mean you work your butt off to be able to choose where you work ...
  21. Also the wins aren't helping fill the 'dome. Tampa has to do a lot to make the market care. The Red Sox get a lot more bang for the win.
  22. Betts will just turn 28 when he hits UFA-dom. 10 years is silly ... 6 is not. Or for that matter a long deal with a player option after 3 seasons. Bogaerts wiill just turn 27 when he hits UFA-dom. Same as above where the team probably has a bit more leverage. Benintendi is a non-issue Bradley will be almost 31 when he hits free agency - a long deal is a hard pass.
  23. That is kind of simplistic. Fangraphs value is EXTREMELY context dependent - and heck, it varies during the season. Tampa's dollar per WAR is very low - though it can jump up if it is high enough. (tl;dr - Tampa has to pile up a lot of wins before anybody gives enough of a crap for them to move the needle financially) Boston's is higher. At the same time, the teams' own "replacement" is not the hypothetical R of WAR - but what they actually expect to be able to sign for the position. I mean, a "replacement player" is basically an "up and down" guy. Basically Bryce Brentz (for an outfielder).
  24. Listen - I agree in principle that being the 2009 Yankees is less fun - though I suppose jacko would disagree there. If you categorize re-signing studs our farm system signed and developed as buying a title - I have to disagree. After all - what is the point of the Red Sox doing stuff right then.
  25. The surcharges could hamper ownership's willingness to pay ... but that is their decision. The draft pick penalty is relatively meaningless.
×
×
  • Create New...