sk7326
-
Posts
7,647 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by sk7326
-
I don't care if they sign him - but he lacks the flexibility needed to be a quality set-up person, as well as (now) the stuff. With the rotation injuries piling up, signing him is better than nothing - but just barely.
-
It's not that it was goofy or not goofy - it's just that it simply didn't matter (as long as he was not batting 9th). And for the most part it hasn't. Betts is really f'in good - and that was true in April also.
-
I just don't see any high leverage place where I'd use him.
-
I don't see a situation where Papelbon can be remotely helpful. He has little experience in uncontrolled situations and he was awful this season.
-
He's great anywhere on a baseball diamond. Definitely a triumph of scouting - and the Sox amateur staff actually knowing a kid's makeup and betting on it to get him in the 5th round.
-
Well with Detroit he had an aging team with no real upside - and the team was allowed to bottom out to create their window starting in 2006. (his early Detroit teams were some of the worst of all time) And he made the moves (most notably the Andrew Miller for Miguel Cabrera one) which cemented a significant championship window. He made some shorter sighted moves after that - due to ownership priorities - and was never full able to figure out the bullpen construction thing ... but it is hard to go against what he has accomplished. The key thing for him in Boston is that he is where the buck stops. The Red Sox have significantly simplified their decision authority vis a vis baseball matters - and that helps a lot. IF the Sox over the longer term can continue to keep the smart folks from the past decade here, then you could have the best of all worlds. Dombrowski has had a solid year - not a disaster by any stretch, but not coming up aces like Epstein's 2003 or anything. But that they did roll the dice on Benintendi as opposed to overpay for a warmed over Jay Bruce is encouraging.
-
If you want some actual snark ... Usually the pitcher the Sox would use in this case would be Wake. Perhaps Farrell thought there was a link between knuckleballs and baserunning skillz.
-
This ... I do hope Frank Thomas getting in helps all of this out (he played 1B for a while - badly, but DH'd a lot too). I think both guys are HoF worthy, and maybe Ortiz should get in because of the postseason TV clips and the titles. That stuff is totally fine. I have no problem with DH having a very high offensive standard (because they are specialists with only one way to impact the game). But to have an embargo on players who did that as their primary vocation does not really make sense.
-
Of course. The only criticism I'd have is why the starters do not have that comfort - why it is not part of the coaching. When you have the tiny bench the 13 man staffs of this day and age requires, being able to pinch run is something which would actually be useful.
-
.873 OPS over 7 series vs .962 over 17 series. Ortiz has produced more memorable moments than any player I can remember, and he had lots of chances to do so - he also was legitimately bad in 4 of the 8 pennant chases he was part of. But the peaks are remarkable - and very well should get him into the Hall with the other stuff. The Mariners were outstanding for a lot of their time there - just couldn't beat the Yankees in October, something which happened to a lot of teams.
-
It helps to have better teammates than your opponent. It is funny how narratives like "putting them on your shoulders" persists despite all the insistence on ideas like "chemistry", "clubhouse" and "coming together as a team".
-
I am the first to consider it - and I've always noted he was the better player (you can't unsee Ortiz' dip in 2009). But Ortiz has many more narrative points, while also being a darn good DH. So him getting in first is defensible - and ultimately good for Martinez as it would validate the DH as a HoF worthy job (as well it should be).
-
I think that mattered less. LF was doable between Holt, Young, Hill and Shaw and Ramirez (just wanted to see if you were reading the last one). If Benintendi were expected to have Christian Vasquez' bat, the position of need would be staffed another way. Playing LF at Fenway itself is something which stands outside of being a good outfielder. Carl Crawford is a primo example here. Only way to do it is to do it.
-
They ran out of pitchers, that's it. That is a GM/spaghetti monster problem. 2011 was not Tito's best year. But 2010 might have been - so the idea that it all went awry that quickly is batty.
-
Riverside is an easy place for someone from the South - who does not have to do a ton of contested parking (and on the Green Line!). I've found if you are ambitious, garage parking in Central Square is doable and less onerous than other parts of the city (straightforward shot from the Pike).
-
The accusations with Francona resembled stuff I heard when I lived in Georgia about Bobby Cox. He did not do a lot of showy, "managery" things - like call lots of bunts, hit and runs, steals, ornate lineup shifts. But - in the long run - letting good players play is a fairly straightforward, high percentage way to be. And certainly Francona did not curtail Ellsbury's itch to run when he was here.
-
I think that is where we disagree - actively engaging in the game is what fans do. The appeal to authority here is a bit milquetoast - especially when the manager deviates from something fairly obvious. After all, Grady's decision in 2003 was wholly indefensible - even if it worked! Personally, the on-field stuff is about 20% of the job to me ... which means that being meh at it is not fatal to your overall performance. That does not mean that it does not matter, and sometimes it matters a lot. Grady, Ron Washington pulling the infield at an inexplicable time in the World Series.
-
Good thing here is that the Red Sox can wait to make the decision on Moncada - they can easily manipulate the roster to keep him playoff eligible without being on the 40-man at the end of the month. My guess - with no insight of course - is that Benintendi came up first because his craft/approach might be more advanced than Moncada. Anybody who saw the homerun at the futures game knows the physical talent with Moncada.
-
Kinsler and Pedroia are fairly close - I think Pedroia's actual peakiness puts him a shade above. Finished Top 10 MVP 3 times to Kinsler's zero (and obviously won it) and same number of All-Star appearances - and the two rings. Utley is a case where he just hasn't been very good the last 3 years or so. He was once arguably the best position player in the league - for me he is very tough. The edge Pedroia has is that he is still quite good, and a better Age 32 player than Utley was.
-
I was more interested in your gross underrating of Francona than the rest. I think the Red Sox have generally been managed fine - if you define it as "not actively hurting the team". And so much of what a manager does is behind closed doors. I mean - Ned Yost and Ron Washington were comically bad managers tactically ... but they piloted teams which won back to back AL pennants. So they did some part of their job well - because it came out in the product. Farrell gets me mad at times - but then in 2013 he was tactically superior to Leyland and Maddon in head to head matchups. (having the hosses is nice too)
-
With Pedroia the question is whether it falls off a cliff over glides down gently. Essentially when his hands have been healthy, he has been about 90% of his 25 year old self ... if he keeps that up for a couple more seasons there will be the bulk accumulation. What hurts Pedroia is the sudden growth of quality at that position. He is probably more like a Top 6 second baseman now, but still a legit top 20-30 position player generally. He and Cano do not have a monopoly on the position anymore - even if their actual production has not slumped that much.
-
I always forget about him - 54.1 WAR over 20 seasons vs 49.4 WAR over 10. Ortiz will get in - when is an interesting question, based on the Hall reforming its attitude about the DH position (clearly they should be held to a higher offensive standard, but blackballing them makes little sense) - he probably gets in over Edgar Martinez if they break the seal on the position.
-
http://www.espn.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/51372/dustin-pedroias-hall-of-fame-chances
-
his strikeout rate is still absurd - control has been the issue when there has been a problem
-
8/15 new city, new Dbags
sk7326 replied to Station 13's topic in Mike Grace Memorial Game Thread Forum
didn't kimbrel throw strikes once?