An itty bitty sample size caused them to demote their alleged catcher of the future - now if this is a smokescreen for "maybe he is not good" that is one thing - but if that is the actual logic, it is pretty darn silly.
It is hard to give them a ton of credit for not selling low on Bradley - and then his second half of 2015 made that obvious. Dustin Pedroia's 31 games in 2006 showed no indicator he could actually play baseball for a living - he was really really bad at most aspects of the game. A lot of the emergency of Bogaerts and Bradley have just been a function of playing and getting reps, things which were monkeyed with unnecessarily in 2014.
The post-Epstein management has been more inclined to make decisions with small sample sizes (note that Sizemore beat out Bradley for the CF job in spring 2014, which made no sense on any level ... and Middlebrooks being anointed the future on a small BABIP Spiked sample) - an urge for microwave prospects who fulfill John Sickels predictions instantly, instead of trusting their evaluations and doing the hard PR job of taking the slings and arrows from the press.