Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

cp176

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,750
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by cp176

  1. A very true statement. i very much like the fact that there are opposing points of view to consider.
  2. Absolutely!
  3. here is where a guy like me gets into the "Who gives a s***" mode? Maybe if we keep beating on the past GM's (most of whom I can't remember) some people will forget about the present. it is so much fun to hammer down on all that has happened in the past. Whatever the new guy's name is maybe he is thinking that he will get at least a year of two of free passes due to all of the absolutely incompetent work done by his predecessors.
  4. oh Nick - you know not what you have done.
  5. think I made a little posting error here Nick - meant for my friend Slasher.
  6. The only thing that this will get you Slasher is another atta boy - you are my hero - post of the day comment. lol
  7. When that event happened, i was as disappointed probably as much as I could have been. I could not believe it but I not for one minute ever game any blame to Billy Buck. I wish that he had made it but if not for him, much like I feel about Mookie we would not have even been in that game. he had had a hell of a season.
  8. Slasher - would the Sox have won in '86 if Stapleton had replaced Billy Buck? It certainly would have been the right move to make i think, but no one knows whether or not we would have won.
  9. I cannot answer the unanswerable question Slash. Who knows - As for the Mookie Nomar controversy, as good as Nomar was in his prime, I'm still taking Mookie. Better in every facet of the game. it is all good though. We are fortunate to have seen them both.
  10. Hey - I see that CLIFF word right there.
  11. I loved the young Nomar and at the plate what wasn't there to love. he came along when we needed a star. Honestly though, I never saw him as a great fielder. he could get to balls and often times made the what looked to be impossible play. The but is that for me, it seemed like the routine groundball seemed to cause him more trouble than it should have. Like Cabrerra or not he gave us consistent play at the ss position. I still think that comparing Nomar to Mookie is nuts. In all aspects of the game Mookie seems to be ahead of him. Betts is on a different level not to mention that he still has youth on his side.
  12. you beat me to the punch. I agree with you . Betts may be traded for sure but he could be forever seen as the second most important one to get away. He could be that good. Obviously the Babe being number 1.
  13. Personal opinion of course once again but I don't think the two players really are comparable regardless of what the stats show. Nomar was one helluva baseball player for sure not so much as he aged. Betts very well might be one of the very best we have seen in Boston. he is young and has started a Hall of fame like career. In my mind there is a big difference between the two. Nomar was very very good when he was young and healthy, Betts is arguably the second best player in the game today at a pretty young age. After Mike Trout, i'm guessing that Mookie is the next guy up.
  14. very very nice job
  15. I'm futuristic!!! Don't look back on what has been, look ahead to what might be! (hmm think I remember where that came from - just kidding actually I do)
  16. I think that you are giving Nomar too much credit!
  17. Now that does bring back some memories. Gary Gieger (who I bet you never heard of) to Fred Lynn I think is closer.
  18. hmm let see - Nomar is to Mookie as ______________ would be too ______________. You get to fill in the blanks.
  19. Sucks he plays for the Angels doesn't it.
  20. What are you saying notin? Come on now, I don't remember mentioning the Clemens trade. Also are you trying to imply that I don't realize that Betts has one more year to go? You have absolutely no idea what my logic is. Oh and thanks for putting words in my mouth which I did not intend to say. What I said was that trading away Betts for next to nothing in return, without making a really strong effort to sign him, will not be looked upon favorably by many fans no matter how it is spun. They (we) do not see things the way you and a couple of other posters see see things. Just a different perspective than yours.
  21. I was concerned about losing Moncada and sort of a little concerned with losing Kopech but getting Chris Sale was worth it and would have been silly not to make the trade. As for everyone of those other players lost - ho hum. I will admit though that I was fond of Margot and Dubon. I absolutely believe that it is time to look ahead and those who continually keep expressing negative feelings about DD have something else going on. What it is, I don't know. Maybe it is a constant need to feel right when there likely is no right or wrong. It strikes me as strange. The majority of successful people that I know tend to look ahead and not backward. I'm all in on our new GM but he won't get any free pass from most fans regardless of what he was left with. It is about him now and not our former GM. From all reports it looks like the right guy could have been hired. Let's see how he does.
  22. You tickle me. Now - trading away a possible generational talent for next to nothing could hurt this franchise much more than any trades made yesteryear by whoever the GM was.
  23. You speak my language!!!
×
×
  • Create New...