Jump to content
Click here to check out our updated free agents rankings, now up to 150 players and sortable by position! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    55,149

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    But the $8.4 million secures the player's rights for X number of seasons, doesn't it?
  2. Bellhorn04
    I haven't seen one of these for a while, but we used to see trades where the acquiring team was given a 48 hour window or something like that to sign an extension with the player. In this case the Dodgers got a much longer window, you might say. It seems pretty obvious that a big part of why they made the trade was that they figured they could keep him.
  3. Bellhorn04
    Yeah, I think I might e-mail Cot's Contracts about the AAV thing. Spotrac shows it as 25.55.
  4. Bellhorn04
    Just look at our 2018 deadline deals: Beeks for Eovaldi Buttrey for Kinsler Espinal for Pearce
  5. Bellhorn04
    Think about it. The Red Sox offer of 10/300 (AAV of 30) has been characterized as a starting bid, some even call it a lowball offer. The Dodgers got him for 6.5 million more than that in present dollars, and an AAV that's 4.45 million lower than that.
  6. Bellhorn04
    Big moment for Ben Cherington?
  7. Bellhorn04
    As always, you have to look at what the selling teams would be interested in. Which selling teams have a good late inning reliever whose contract is expiring at the end of the year, for starters.
  8. Bellhorn04
    I think you have to give Friedman and the Dodgers some credit for prescience. They judged that the pandemic would not have lasting financial repercussions. Mookie's deal looks vastly better than what Lindor got.
  9. Bellhorn04
    No matter how much of a crapshoot the playoffs are, bolstering your pitching can't hurt your chances. Anyway, I'm sure whatever Bloom does will be smart.
  10. Bellhorn04
    The Yankees offense looked like it had come to life against Seattle. They won the series opener 12-1, and scored 5 more in the first 2 innings of the second game. And then went scoreless the final 16 innings of the series. They got one hit today.
  11. Bellhorn04
    The dream is over, just like that.
  12. Bellhorn04
    I get your point and don't necessarily disagree. The only catch here, and it can't really be factored in by any mathematical method, is that Betts signed an extension with the Dodgers. He did not get to free agency. That's the catch. And it was a relatively team-friendly deal, when you factor in the deferrals. So this was a big extra benefit to the Dodgers. And if the Red Sox had any aspirations of bidding on Mookie in free agency, which no one really knows about, such aspirations were obviously snuffed out by this.
  13. Bellhorn04
    I would say that a strong majority of ours, going back to 2004, have worked out quite well.
  14. Bellhorn04
    Yep, there have been plenty of good ones.
  15. Bellhorn04
    Do the names Eovaldi and Pearce ring a bell?
  16. Bellhorn04
    It depends on the cost, of course. Our deadline acquisitions in 2004, 2013 and 2018 were pretty helpful.
  17. Bellhorn04
    1981 was an amazing mess. They split the season into two half-seasons, with the division winners of each half-season playing off in a preliminary round. Teams only played about 110 games that year. The Cincinnati Reds had the best total record in the National League, and did not make the playoffs!
  18. Bellhorn04
    I know, but what business do we have playing with hypotheticals? The season was shortened by a pandemic. Oddly enough, the last time the season really got screwed up, but was completed, was the strike year of 1981, and the Dodgers also won that year.
  19. Bellhorn04
    My belief is that sometimes you have to let the season unfold before you know how good or bad a job was done in the offseason. With the Red Sox, you have a case of a better job being done by Bloom than many realized.
  20. Bellhorn04
    I think notin's point is a sound one - the Red Sox going out of their way to avoid crossing the threshold this year, and thereby passing up a deal that could really bolster the 2021 chances, would not necessarily be smart. And going over by a few million doesn't necessarily have any significant future repercussions.
  21. Bellhorn04
    Hey, we were having a perfectly good luxury tax argument in the other thread. Might as well move it here, I guess.
  22. Bellhorn04
    Only a handful of teams have ever paid any significant amount of luxury tax, of course. Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox. A few other teams have gotten relatively small bills.
  23. Bellhorn04
    No team? The Dodgers blew WAY past it this year.
  24. Bellhorn04
    I have to approve of your logic here.
  25. Bellhorn04
    Well, what they are arguing is that the regular season was too short. That's the only argument.
×
×
  • Create New...