Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. In incremental terms, all they offered was 1 year @ $30 mill.
  2. I also agree with Kimmi's point that if Quality Start doesn't work for you, just go with Game Score. It's much less arbitrary.
  3. Personally I have no problem with 6 and 3 being a Quality Start. It's the 6 innings part that matters most. I get the 4.50 ERA argument. You're going to have to establish an arbitrary baseline somewhere. When you give 6 and 3 you're presumably turning the game over to your best relievers, who should arguably only give up 1 run in 3 innings. And then there's the High Quality Start, which I believe is 7 and 2.
  4. But Game Score rewards volume of innings, correct?
  5. David Price looked like pure quality when we signed him too. He helped win a title but has mostly been in the baggage department. And Sale is a great pitcher who they obviously thought would not be spending so little time on the field. We (the royal we) can find examples to support any position.
  6. I guarantee that was supposed to be 5 and 2.
  7. But a big part of the idea of the Quality Start was giving some length, not overly taxing the pen, and not giving the other team a shot at your middle relievers, which at one time was the 'dregs' of the bullpen. 3 & 0 obviously doesn't fit that bill. However, as the game changes to a total staff game, 3 & 0 does become more valuable.
  8. Pivetta is without quality today.
  9. You have to draw the line somewhere. Or, we can just have "Quality Outing" that applies to all pitchers, but that might be overkill.
  10. There have been some players who do like staying put. Wakefield and Ortiz come to mind. They kept taking short deals and not testing free agency.
  11. 5 and 2 is clearly the new QS.
  12. SPLINTER is usually very reliable. But the clock is indeed ticking.
  13. Also to be noted is that Xander has a swing made for Fenway. Career: Home .870 Road .754
  14. I'd offer Eovaldi 3 @ $20, but he would laugh at it. Gausman got 5 @ $22.
  15. Also a good chance that if he gets 8 @ $30, the second half is an albatross.
  16. There's been talk, but it's nothing promising. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/04/eovaldi-wont-discuss-extension-during-season.html
  17. That's how it's presently defined. They may have to revise it to 5 innings and 2 runs.
  18. Sure, but the thing is, he got 7 years compared to Story's 6, and Story is 2 years younger.
  19. The deals those guys got make Story's deal look pretty darn good. It's almost like Bloom is being smart or something.
  20. I have no problem at all with your opinions. I'm just pointing out that Henry has not yet given out a contract higher than Price's 217 mill.
  21. It's possible that Story + Wacha yield as much value as Mookie this year. We shall see! Then there's the 5 additional years at 30.5 AAV part.
  22. No, I don't think we do know that. As I think you've noted, the biggest contracts he's ever given out pale beside some of the ones now being handed out by other owners.
×
×
  • Create New...