Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    55,149

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    The offense, what there is, is still being carried by 3 guys, 2 who are likely gone by next year, and the other who may be gone the year after. That has to be causing the front office a bit of anxiety...
  2. Bellhorn04
    Brasier and Barnes on a two-man rocket to the sun?
  3. Bellhorn04
    This is supposed to be a serious discussion!
  4. Bellhorn04
    Right, but why did Seager score and Correa get left on the sidelines? Blind luck, perhaps?
  5. Bellhorn04
    You're assuming facts not in evidence.
  6. Bellhorn04
    Do you know when the Dodgers presented the offer?
  7. Bellhorn04
    Words are cheap. Actions are more telling. Mookie didn't have to sign an extension with the Dodgers. We all thought he was one of those guys who wanted to take the risk and get to free agency. Seems like he wanted to be in LA, does it not?
  8. Bellhorn04
    The only thing is, "fair market value" is a matter of opinion. There's no consistency at all in the deals guys get. Seager got $325 million. Correa, who is 5 months younger and has a higher career WAR, got $105 million (with opt-outs each year). That's a wild disparity for two similar players. It's not a rational market.
  9. Bellhorn04
    And now the score, Five to One, is a Doors' song.
  10. Bellhorn04
    You missed the point. You're the one who said "We'll see who's right."
  11. Bellhorn04
    This thread is about how much we would pay, not whether Bloom will do it. So there's no right or wrong.
  12. Bellhorn04
    Jeez, you're all questions and no answers.
  13. Bellhorn04
    Maybe we are heavy on warm-weather hitters.
  14. Bellhorn04
    Yeah but you're still not saying who you actually like.
  15. Bellhorn04
    You're a hard man to please, you know. You don't like Eovaldi because of his career old school numbers. You don't like Cole, who has great career old school numbers, because of one postseason outing. We're yet to hear of too many guys you actually do like. Bob Gibson, I suppose.
  16. Bellhorn04
    Your odds of being right are better than 50%, no doubt.
  17. Bellhorn04
    I really have serious doubts about the importance of FIP.
  18. Bellhorn04
    The Yankees would probably take Nate off our hands. (Playing dirty now.)
  19. Bellhorn04
    Well, if you're into the Johnny Clutch stuff, Eovaldi seems to fit the bill?
  20. Bellhorn04
    Of course. But how many are slam dunk great deals? Scherzer's with the Nats was, in retrospect. But he's an exception.
  21. Bellhorn04
    To me, Eovaldi is a guy who has made himself a much better pitcher. Look at those fantastic K/BB numbers the last 3 years. Plus from all accounts he works super hard keeping himself in top shape. The durability of his twice-repaired arm is obviously the big risk factor.
  22. Bellhorn04
    I hear what you're saying. But guys who check all the boxes like Cole get $324 million. Expensive times.
  23. Bellhorn04
    Chapman is a potential problem. A closer with a walk rate over 6 is not ideal.
  24. Bellhorn04
    They may indeed have turned a corner when AC shaved.
  25. Bellhorn04
    Same, I'd go as high as 4 years @ $23-24 mill.
×
×
  • Create New...