Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Pedro wasn't going to throw a complete game there though. Grady had to go to the pen at some point.
  2. We very briefly had Boof Bonser, too.
  3. The funny thing is, up until we got Whitlock, the Rule 5 draft didn't seem to get talked about much at all. It didn't seem like a big deal. Now suddenly it is.
  4. That's exactly what I keep saying.
  5. You're going to have a hard time convincing me Song isn't a completely unique case. A highly regarded prospect whose one and only issue is his military service. I think the Red Sox got screwed by Rule 5 here. There should have been some sort of exemption. But that's all beside the point now.
  6. Pumpkins connect the two.
  7. Song's situation is unprecedented. To me that's the whole point. Since he's unique, of course someone like him has never been taken before.
  8. Not you too. Where was the discussion on the Rule 5 draft here? The only people here I would expect to be in the know on something like that are you and notin. And you guys didn't mention a thing about Ward and Song until after the draft - like everyone else.
  9. I was gonna say, your proposal is straight out of the DD playbook. The 2017 Sox were more in a window of contention than the 2023 Sox, though.
  10. The thing is, Song's case is just about unprecedented. Sure, it's the easy play to bet that he has no chance, but we don't actually have any comparative cases as evidence. It's all conjecture. Nobody really knew what Whitlock would be like in 2021, either.
  11. It was a hypothetical question, notin. "If the Sox decide to be jerks..."
  12. Spoken like a true Red Sox fan.
  13. He threw a ton of innings at a young age.
  14. I think what really bothers me about the prospect of losing Song is that it seems to run totally opposite to the philosophy we thought Bloom had. Sacrificing a possible future asset for the sake of having someone mediocre but of use in 2023. Maybe Bloom was thinking about his job and the urgency of making the playoffs this year. Or maybe he just assumed Song wouldn't be taken or wouldn't be able to pitch this year. I'd love to know what Kimmi thinks of it, because she's so future-and-farm-oriented.
  15. You're only getting 2 guaranteed years of him, is a problem. And another, from the Red Sox perspective, is that he can't pitch.
  16. That article must have been written years ago, because it only credits the Patriots with 5 titles. Their ranking of the Celtics 11 in 13 is pretty absurd, alright.
  17. Why would the Phillies have to trade him?
  18. Yeah, right, I'm showing bias with a hypothetical question asked because I'm interested in how the rules work.
  19. Right, but my devious mind automatically goes to: "What if the Red Sox decide to be jerks about it and say they want more than that?" Is there a mechanism in place to prevent this?
  20. And how the heck does that work, I mean, what or who determines if what the Phillies offer in trade is acceptable and the trade has to go through? This is an education in some arcane rules, if nothing else...
  21. There are plenty of meaningless innings required to be pitched too... With Philly's offense, they'll be sure to have some blowouts.
  22. King Felix!
  23. Right, I'm sure they wouldn't be asking for much...
  24. I will make one prediction: if Song can get his fastball over 90 between now and April, Dave Dombrowski will do everything in his power to keep him.
×
×
  • Create New...