The latter, presumably.
And we don't know how much difference any of it makes.
Maybe if Atlanta was pitching these guys on fewer days rest they'd have a better record. Don't you normally want to use your best as much as possible? They're not 5 deep in aces. Maybe what they're doing is stupid. It's all a matter of opinion.
Well, they're "accomodating" Max Fried exactly the same.
The fact that Atlanta is using a different approach doesn't mean Sale or Fried wouldn't be able to handle Boston's approach.
Full marks for effort, though.
Atlanta's schedule has somehow allowed all of their starters to have extra rest days.
If Sale pitches 3 innings tonight he will lead their rotation in innings.
He hasn't been treated differently from their other starters.
I don't think many have said to DFA Grissom. Just that his chances of contributing in 2024 seem slim at this point. A .367 OPS and a recurring hamstring injury do tend to make you fall out of favor.
There have been a fair number of Grissom Pollies too. "Yeah, the injury and the flu set him back...he's been hitting the ball, just unlucky...only a matter of time before he starts raking!"
The problem with Grissom is that we're now at the stage that every game matters and they don't really have the luxury of trying to ease him back in. The only thing that would create an opening for him is injuries. The guys we have for second now are not stars, but they've been contributing.
That feels like a pretty large heap of ifs right now. Grissom has 2 IL stints and a -0.9 fWAR in the time he played. Not sure many would rather see him than Hamilton.
C'mon man, nobody said irritating over scoring, because nobody would. You injected that into the discussion yourself. jung was clearly suggesting irritating and scoring.
Pretty good data-based article on why the Braves thought Sale was worth taking a chance on.
https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/chris-sale-trade-three-stats-that-show-why-braves-are-taking-chance-on-veteran-lefty/